Episode Transcript
In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2As the clock strikes thirteen, it's Monday, the fifteenth of September, Year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five.
Well, today we're going to take a look at how the Conservatives have flipped the script on cancel culture.
No, they're not getting rid of it.
They're doubling down, and they're as bad or worse than the leftise And we've got people like Congressman, multiple congressmen, many different radical proposals.
And of course that's necessary, isn't it.
We got to have the conservatives do the things that you'd think that only the left would do.
That's how this is going to be used.
Meanwhile, we'll take a look at the Keystone comps actually be more specifically Keystone cash furreeze, and the real problem behind all the stuff that no one wants to talk about.
I've not seen a single article commentator anywhere talking about the real fundamental problem with this.
And then we look at Venezuela, nothing other than gangster government, the same kind of stuff that Smedley Butler warned us about, except this has some different aspects.
To it because China is already deeply involved in Venezuela.
This isn't going to be like it was with Smedley Butler.
This could be another touch point for World War three.
We'll be right back.
Well, I got really upset over the weekend when I saw these ludicrous, insane authoritarian proposals from multiple GOP congressmen giving brand new powers to Marco Rubio to revoke passports of American citizens, but especially what was done by one representative, Clay Higgins on Louisiana.
I kind of say, there is something deeply wrong with the Louisiana GOP.
They have given us squeaker mouse Johnson.
They have the sycophant that is there who doesn't care about the rule of law any regard.
They've also given us Senator Cassidy, the gatekeeper over health appointments, who is a of the biggest supporters for vaccine poisoning.
And then we've got this guy, this new guy, Clay Higgins, who is truly off the wall reactionary to all of this, and he is not just embracing censorship.
But the amazing thing to me is that these conservatives are doing it in the name of Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk was all about debate and bringing back free speech.
These people are despising his legacy.
Truly crazy how they're doubling down.
I wrote a substack article about this cancel culture's new face when conservatives embrace censorship.
Not that they haven't always embraced it to some degree more quietly, It's just that with this they are really really coming at us.
And when you think cancel culture is only a radical left thing, think again.
In the UK, Christians watched in horror and amazement as prayer.
Silent prayer wasn't simply mocked, as democrats have done here, but punished.
A woman has been repeatedly arrested for praying silently in the vicinity of an infant sacrifice center.
Even after the court threw out the charges and awarded damages, the police arrested her.
Yet again, law doesn't matter to them, only their agenda.
Here in the US, leftists mocked people for praying after a shooting tragedy, but in the UK, apparently they're worried that it works and they don't want to spare any child from death by a doctor.
As a matter of fact, that same understanding that prayer works is also in play in Australia.
We'll talk about it later.
They do not want you praying in silent groups over somebody being getting somebody away from this transgender insanity.
Now there's not a center that they are protecting, so it's not a physical place.
It's not like you're standing out there.
So how would they know, right, How would they know that you're praying for that?
Are they going to put informants in churches?
Are they going to just assume that because a church opposes the transgender insanity that they're where these people are criminals?
I think that's the more likely scenario.
But they do believe that it works, don't they.
And you notice that as our governments in the West turn increasingly towards Marxism and socialism, they become increasingly strident in terms of attacking Christians.
JD.
Vance rightfully called out the UK over the obsession with all forms of censorship, especially social media.
But when it comes to something that American conservatives care about strongly, they show themselves even more zealous in punishing speech than their British counterparts.
They remove the mask of pretense as defenders of free speech, first to stop any criticism of GAZA, and now conservatives, justifiably angry at the murder of Charlie Kirk, are imagining how they can punish those who mock and cheer the murder.
Politicians see an opportunity to virtue signal to their base, and they're producing bills that are a repudiation of Charlie's life work.
Charlie Kirk his life and gave his life supporting free and open debate, tolerating those that he disagreed with, and inviting them to quote prove me wrong.
But now multiple GOP congressmen are proposing bills to prove that Charlie was wrong and to punish speech that they don't like.
The punishments are radical and in violation of the Amendments prohibition the First Amendments Prohibition of cruel I'm sorry, Eighth Amendments, Prohibition of Cruel and Unusual Punishment.
This congressman wants lifetime social media bands.
He also wants to revoke business licenses.
He wants even driver's licenses revoked.
If you are engaged in speech, then the government doesn't like this tactic of using big tech corporations, and that's the key thing.
He knows that the First Amendment, he knows what it says, and he knows that it begins with Congress shall make no Law.
So this reprehensible traitor, Clayhiggins says, I'm going to lean into my friends at big Tech.
That's the way they've done it all along.
We knew that before we got the documents with the Twitter dump, we already knew who was pushing this stuff, and it was coming out of the Trump administration during the so called pandemic.
Then, of course Biden went deep into it.
I've been banned from YouTube for posing the pandemic lockdown's mRNA, genetic weapons, etc.
They won't even allow me to put up a music channel.
I've been fired by so called alt media for opposing stop to Steal.
I've been banned by teals mafia on PayPal and Venmo.
This is not an abstraction from me.
Everyone should recognize that the Chinese social credit system is just a beta test for what the technocracy seeks to establish everywhere for everyone.
An idiotic and ignorant suggestion by young TikToker now is being echoed everywhere, calling for censorship of the press.
She completely misunderstands the Smith Monk Pack, but she wants to call it this new one Charlie Kirk Act.
Let me play this for you.
Will not believe this person is gus On the named La Mayn.
I told Karen, I said, who would have thought we're watching nineteen sixties sitcoms that La may and Fred Mertz would become the bane of the twenty first century?
Speaker 3Alrighty, This message is for President Trump and his administration.
If you stay to watch the video, please tag him down below, share, and repost so we can try to get this to him as quickly as possible and hope that he can do something with this.
President Trump, as a supporter who voted for you three times, I am hoping and praying that you will revisit what Barack Obama and Joe Biden got rid of back in twenty thirteen, which is a Smith Month Act which held news corporations accountable for lying to the American people and spreading propaganda instead of truth.
I think instead of bringing it back as a Smith Month Act, you name it the Charlie Kirk Act.
You make it a law, and you make it daan near and possible for these people to continue to lie to the American public, which has brought chaos, hatred, division, and anarchy all across his country.
Finds out the ass which will damn near bankrupt their companies should they lie to the American people.
Speaker 2Ever again, why shoot, it's a spitting image of the life, doesn't she looks like.
Speaker 4It a fact?
Speaker 5Because of their constant lies.
Speaker 3A man lost his life over it, because of the constant, hateful rhetoric of calling him a fascist and a Nazi and a white supremacist and a bigot, the same thing that they called you.
Speaker 5This man is dead.
Speaker 3I think this would be a great legacy for him to have a law named after him, to force journalists to finally start telling the truth and having the integrity that they have lacked for over a decade.
Speaker 2It gets to decide what the truth is.
Speaker 6It's to you.
Speaker 3I hope that you think about it and that you pass it into law, because we are on a dangerous path right now with the constant lies and the propaganda.
And that doesn't end just at news journalists.
It needs to go to content creators who consistently spread lies and propaganda and half truths internet.
Speaker 2Anybody content, if you participate in social media.
Speaker 3People need to start being held accountable for baseless claims over how about you abysmal things.
Speaker 2It needs to end.
Speaker 3So please, if you have it in your heart to have the time to do this, get this in front of Congress, get this passed as a law, and start holding these news corporations, be they right, left or center, accountable for their behavior.
Speaker 2Congress shall make no law.
Elie, there's exhibit a of the idiocracy that we live in in this country.
Don't tell me that Charlie Kirk was turning the youth around.
All he did was change the tribes.
She is exactly like the leftist, absolutely one hundred percent like that.
It's just she wears a maga cap, no difference whatsoever.
They don't get it.
They don't understand what's going on.
They don't support free speech and debate.
And when she starts talking about the smith Mont Act while she was still in diapers, presumably I was taught talking about that back in twenty thirteen, and that was not what she characterizes it as, not at all.
It was not anything at all that would control or judge speech by the press or free speech by the public.
It had nothing to do with that.
Understand that after World War Two and kicking off the Cold War, Truman did a bunch of things to create the National Security State, and then he started using the military as the world's policeman.
But really what he was doing was creating a police state here domestically at home.
He created the NSA by executive order, he did the charter for the CIA.
They started using the term national security.
They changed the name of the Department of War to Department of Defense to be a little more subtle about it.
But part of that was the creation of these propaganda Organsas, Voice of America, Radio for Europe, and things like that underneath it.
And people were concerned that the government was first of all, creating its own news media, because the government doesn't have authority to print money, and it doesn't have authority to have printing presses either, does it.
It has no authority to do those things.
And people were concerned about it because I understood that the weapons of propaganda abroad would become weapons of propaganda at home, and of course they have, you know.
In addition to that, we had things like Corporation for Public Broadcasting and NPR, but those were portrayed as they were going to be all about art and so forth.
But there were propaganda organizations.
But the smith Mont Act was there in nineteen forty eight to assuage the fears of conservatives that we were going to create this massive propaganda organization of the government.
Of course, they did Operation mocking Bird secretly, but Voice of America was there in your face, and so they said, we're going to prohibit them doing it here at home.
They can only do this abroad.
You know, the same lies that they told us about the CIA, the NSSA, the same lies that then resurfaced when people found out about it, and they had the Frank Church Commission.
The product of that was a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, emphasizing that these organizations created by Truman and the National Security State could only spy on foreigners in foreign countries, couldn't even spy on foreigners in America without a search warrant.
All of that was a lie, a distraction, and a cover up.
And so she has absolutely no idea what's going on.
In twenty thirteen, Smith Munt was not banned.
Instead, what they did was they relaxed some of the controls on it.
Now, those of us who knew how the government was lying and had apps for programs for it.
Were very concerned because when we saw those probitions being taken away, it's like, well, they're going to double down in our face openly with propaganda, which is what they did.
But that was what we were talking about in twenty thirteen.
This is Obama getting ready of these prohibitions on direct propaganda because that's what he wants to do, and so it has absolutely nothing to do with it.
But as stupid as Trump and his supporters are, he retweeted that, so he approves of that message, and he also doesn't believe that there's any controlling legal authority to stop him from censoring people, as we've already seen in his administration.
And then that brings us to this other traitor, Clay Higgins from Louisiana.
He said this, I'm going to use congressional authority and every influence with big tech platforms to immediately mandate a band for life of every post or commenter that belittle the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
You just did more to dishonor his legacy than anybody could have ever possibly done.
Higgins, if they ran their mouth with their smartass hatred celebrating the heinous murder of that beautiful young man who dedicated his whole life to delivering respectful conservative truth.
Let me say this, Conservatives don't have a different truth.
It's like the liberals when they talk about social justice.
Once you put an adjective in front of justice, you're not talking about real justice.
You put an adjective in front of truth, you're not talking about truth either.
Anyway, he said conservative truth into the hearts of liberal enclave universities.
Why are we funding them, Higgins?
Why don't you stop that if you want to do something armed only with a Bible and a microphone and a Constitution, which obviously Higgins has never read, though he had to swear to it in order to become a congressman to have any authority.
So I'm going to lean forward into this fight.
This man demanding that big tech have zero tolerance for violent political hate content.
So he understands that isn't going to get past square one with a censorship bill because of the First Amendment.
So they always do it in the back door with their partners that they can bully.
And this guy sits on the House Armed Services Committee, so he can bully these people very effectively, because most of them have financial interests that he can affect.
I'm also going after their business licenses and permits.
I'm going to have them blacklisted aggressively.
They should be kicked off from every platform, and their driver's licensees should even be revoked.
I'm basically going to cancel these animals who celebrated Charlie Kirk's assassination.
I'm starting that today, end of message, just like Trump does, end of message, like it's some kind of a transmission or something.
I cannot express.
Words, cannot express my utter contempt for people like Clay Higgins and for people like Donald Trump.
Absolutely disgusting, absolutely disgusting.
He's going to cancel with extreme prejudice.
So we always knew that that was what they were doing.
They're not fooling anybody, but not even trying to hide it anymore.
So, I said, Charlie Kirk didn't just fight for free speech against the censorship that has come to dominate our so called universities.
He also fought against postmodernism, the idea that there is no such thing as absolute truth and authority.
So Representative Higgins's intended bill opposes both free speech and embraces the leftist postmodern idea of a quote living constitution unquote, in other words, that it is not fixed, it is not literal, but it is malleable by whatever their whims are are, they're evolving whims.
By the way, Higgins is the poster child for what Congress conservatives used to despise, an authoritarian who will use every trick in all of his wiles to circumvent the constitution and principles upon which America was built.
Higgins's voters should ban him from Congress, but that'll never happen due to partisan groupthink and jerrymandering.
Unfortunately, Higgins seems to be in the mainstream of current GOP party politics.
When Charlie Kirk was debating students on campus about Gaza, the Trump administration he was loath to criticize, sought to block money from colleges, which, by the way, the colleges should have never had in the first place if they allowed forbidden speech, and to deport students who are legally here if they engaged in government forbidden speech.
Many of us who said this was just a beginning have now been proven right.
Another traitorous Congressman, Ryan Mask of Florida, a Republican again has introduced a bill to revoke the passports of American citizens if the government doesn't like you for whatever reason.
As far as the TikToker, Elie May again, she's a three time Trump supporter that tells you everything you need to know about or intellect.
Propaganda is the flip side of censorship.
The people promoting censorship, whether it's Rubio Trump, GOP congressman, or some TTOK influencer want to be can't handle the truth.
Their propaganda doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
Unlike Charlie Kirk's respectful manner and his respect for debate and free speech, many of the right have now become raging reactionaries, demanding to burn down what characterized both America and Kirk.
Rather than conserve free speech or the Constitution.
They are more like the radical left.
Jacobins that he debated at the universities proved me wrong.
That's why I said the very first day about Charlie Kirk.
I had some big policy differences with him.
First one that he would support could support Donald Trump.
After what happened in twenty twenty with the lockdowns the genetic code injections, the vent lads and the rest of this stuff.
But you can have a debate, and there was a lot of value in being able to have a debate with people that we disagree with.
And because I had that caveat there, and folks, I'm not going to jump in and declare the guy a saint because he did because he had debates like that or whatever he had to say.
I'm not going to pretend that I agreed with everything that he said.
I have opposed him in the past.
It'd be hypocritical for me to say that.
But because I say that, I'm getting a lot of hate mail from former supporters who canceled me.
So that's exactly what you would expect, isn't it.
I'm not going to back down.
As a matter of fact, I'm not going to revise or revisit any of the those criticisms.
I'm not going to revise them either, but I will revisit them in the future after a certain amount of time has happened.
But you know, I agree with them on some things and I disagree with them on other things.
These people want to shut down anything that they disagree with, and they are total idiots.
It is an idiocracy.
You want to talk about playing forty chess.
These people can't even think four years ahead.
What happens if Trump's not there and you've given these powers to the president, they will shut you down.
Just as I said earlier, you've got the UK and Australia banning silent prayer.
What do you think they're going to do to you if you keep giving them power?
If you hate the First Amendment so much that you're willing to give them this kind of power.
What do you think the Democrats are going to do when they become when they win an election, and they will when an election.
These people can't play checkers, let alone forty chests.
It's absolutely absurd.
Well, let's take a look at the Democrats who are doing the same thing that the Republicans are doing.
You've got a Democrat congressional candidate who pledges that he'll do gun control in Charlie Kirk's name.
Well, you know, Bright Bart says, that's ridiculous, isn't it.
He absolutely hated gun control, and they're right he did.
But he also hated censorship.
And you've got multiple Republicans out there saying that they're going to enact censorship in his name, So both of them are using his legacy or you know what people think he was, to push their agenda, which is exactly what we always see.
This is Texas congressional candidate Isaiah Martin, a Democrat, pledging to introduce gun control in Charlie Kirk's name if elected to serve in the House of Representatives.
Gun Owners of America said, this is an insult to try his legacy as a Second Amendment activist, and I would say that it's an insult to push censorship and cancel culture Clay Higgins in the name of Charlie Kirk.
You completely repudiate everything that he did.
The gun control would create red flags.
Of course, we're not going to red flag people for certain activities, which we'll get into later.
After Kirk's killing, a growing course of conservatives now once has critics ostracized or fired.
This is from ap and they also see the glaring hypocrisy and virtue signaling of these people and how they are shamefully using Kirk's death to forward their agenda of censorship and cancelization.
Conservative backlash against those who criticize him.
The conservatives are calling for firing or ostracism.
As I just read you of those who expressed pleasure at Kirk's death, cancel culture is alive and well on the right, and we have seen this for a long time.
The Associated Process says, after years of complaints from the right about counsel culture from the left, some conservatives are seeking to upend the lives and careers of those who disparage Charlie Kirk after his death.
They're going after companies, educators, news outlets, political rivals, and others that they judge as promoting hate speech.
Let me just say, if it's done by flag hugging conservatives, it's still Jacobin socialism again, you know, off with their heads kill all the people that I disagree with.
It's just if you don't if you don't support the speech of people you disagree with, as Charlie Kirk did.
If you don't support that, you don't have any right to speak either.
Hope, but they kill Charlie Kirk, well, what you're doing is you're ramping this up as well.
A campaign by public officials and others the right has life has uh just is coming just days after his death, and it's leading to the firing or punishment of teachers, an office depot, employee, government workers, a TV pundit, and the expectations of more dismissals coming.
This past weekend, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy posted that American Airlines had grounded pilots who he said were celebrating Kirk's assassination.
This behavior is disgusting and they should be fired, Duffy said, And let me just say this, Certainly it tells us something about somebody's character, and that might be very disturbing.
However, we have seen in the way, then we see what January the sakes when people are using you know, uh marshall rhetoric.
You know, we got to fight this.
Oh well, then you're calling for violence, right, No, that's the kind of rhetoric that both sides have always used.
But now everybody is trying to construe that as a call for violence has elected officials and conservative influencers lionized Kirk as a warrior for free expression who championed provocative opinions.
They're now weaponizing the tactics they saw being used to malign their movement, the calls for firing, for ostracism, the pressure to watch what you say.
This is despicable.
These people have immediately jumped into the Soviet bandwagon.
Such tactics raise a fundamental challenge for a nation that is already dangerously splintered by politics.
Trump on Sunday suggested that he was already using the government to look into his political adversaries when asked if he would investigate them after Kirk's death, Well, of course, he used the PULTI bragged about the fact that he was using artificial intelligence to go over the fine tooth comb all the transactions of people that were political enemies of Trump.
Exode was Lisa Cook.
They're already under major investigation.
A lot of the people that you would traditionally say are on the left, Trump told reporters.
The aftermath of Kirk's death has increasingly become a test of the public tolerance over political differences.
Republicans are pushing not only to punish the alleged killer, but those whose words they believe contributed to the death or dishonored.
It doesn't this sound like January the sixth and Joe Biden.
Sounds like everything the left has done.
At the same time, some liberals on social media have criticized those such as actress Kristin Chenowith, who expressed sympathy online over Kirk's death.
Yeah, of course they had their Emmy Awards for TV last night.
I didn't even know that it was happening.
I don't watch TV, and so giving out a have an awards show that nobody watches, tanned out awards for shows that nobody watches.
But it was on Drudge and his comment was that you know, somebody got up and made a free palace sign, a comment, shout or something than when they won an award.
But he said, nobody mentioned Charlie Kirk and it was a Charlie Kirk free zone.
They didn't say anything negative.
They didn't say anything positive about Charlie Kirk because they've got their own cancel culture, don't they.
Adam Goldstein of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, you should see that as fire.
That's their initials.
And they're very heavily involved on college campuses because that is the seminary for intolerance and for censorship and cancel culture, some Marxist seminary, some Marxist idea.
But he said, if there was ever a time to support the better angels of our nature, it is now.
Goldstein noted that it's unpopular speech like people praising the assassination that stands as the greatest test of acceptance of the First Amendment, especially when government officials get involved.
The only time you're really supporting free speech is when it is unpopular speech, when it is speech that you If you can't support speech that you hate, you don't support free speech.
Get rid of the hate speech laws.
It'll be the very first thing that's out there.
Do that in Charlie Kirk's name, that would be fitting with his legacy.
But instead they become the enemies that they say that they were fighting.
There's no one out there trying to stop people from loving puppies and bunnies, and so it's not about the speech that you love or the videos that you love.
It's about the things that you don't like.
And of course Voltaire never said it directly, but it was a summary of what he said when he said, I may detest what you say, but I will defend it to death.
You're right to say it.
Not these people.
Here's Lindsey Graham.
He says this intact on the movement by using violence.
Says the man who has devoted his entire life to cheering the use of violence.
The man who has cheered mass murder of people with unnecessary wars that he instantly pushes us into.
Yeah, that Lindsay Graham.
It was probably a furry when he gets home at night.
I wouldn't be surprised if he gets outed as a furry himself.
Senator Marshall Blackburn called for the firing of a Middle Tennessee State University professor.
And you know, I would say that if somebody is a government employee, the government has the right to do that for whatever reason.
And if this person is an assistant dean or whatever her position was there quite frankly, look, I'm for firing everybody at the universities.
I'd like to see them shut down.
If people want to start their own universities, just start over again.
There's nothing magic about universities.
And you know, one of the things that Charlie Kirk was adamant about was that they're not educating people.
They're propagandizing them, they're indoctrinating them, they're mis educating them about the facts.
So that was another thing that he was about.
He didn't call for defunding them, which is what I would like to see happen because conservatives previously felt canceled by liberals for their views.
Trump, on his first day back in office, signed an executive order prohibiting everyone in the federal government from engaging in conduct that would quote unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen.
But now all of these virtue signalers in his own party are doing it.
And of course he violated himself when he started coming after the speech of people of speech that he didn't like, speech that he disagreed with on campus when they started opposing Israel.
At the Munich Security Conference, JD.
Vance criticized the preceding Biden administration for encouraging quote, private companies to silence people.
Isn't that what Clay Higgins just did, encouraging private companies to silence people who dared to utter what turned out to be an obvious truth regarding the pandemic?
He said, He assailed Youruropean countries for censoring political speech.
Under Donald Trump's leadership, we may disagree with your views, but we will fight to defend your right to offer it to the public square agree or disagree, Vans said, Well, that hasn't aged too well.
Maybe you should tell it to that traitor, Clay Higgins, but of course there's been nothing said to him.
Goldstein noted the Trump's State Department, in the minutes after Kirk's death warned that it would revoke the visas of any foreigners who celebrated Kirk's assassination.
I can't think of another moment where the US has come out to warn people of their impending cancelation, said Goldstein.
And so again, it's not just these guys I just mentioned, but you had Senator Katie Britt of Alabama went on one of the Sunday talk shows yesterday and said there must be consequences with regards to people spewing that type of hate and celebration on the face of this.
Look, when the left came out with hay speech.
For a short period of time, you had conservatives criticizing the very concept of hate speech, saying it was incompatible with the First Amendment.
I still believe that.
I still say that.
And you can't have consequences for speech, as Katie Britt is, Hey, if you do, you don't have free speech, she said, And I believe there will be consequences.
If only there could be consequences for senators and congressmen who disavow the Constitution that they swore to uphold as a condition of their authority.
Sick and twisted, the US senator says, there must be consequences for people expearing Hey it again, Katie Britt, She's the one who's sick and twisted.
So if you're out there and you're celebrating political assassination of a man who's exercising his free speech, we're going to take away free speech.
We'll show you, right, she said.
It's a very foundational element, a cornerstone of who we are at the United States and this part of the revolution, folks.
And it has to come from the right, you understand, it has to come from right, Just like when Trump did gun control by executive order, it's going to come from the right.
Always has to come from that direction.
You have nine to eleven and the Patriot Act that has to come from the right, and then Reagan and the Vaccine Act, the Childhood Vaccine Act that has to come from the right, just like the PREP Act from George W.
Bush.
Speaker 4You got to make stab the people that are watching you in the back and then attack them from head on.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right, Yeah, we got to make sure the free speech is held and this hate speech is gone.
Now, you can't have both of those things.
They're mutually contradictictory ideas.
If you're going to have free speech, you can't have such a thing called hate speech.
That's absolute nonsense.
You can't label speech you disagree with as hate because you simply hate the First Amendment.
I said, censorship is violence.
These leftists always want to say, well, speech is violence.
I said, no, censorship is violence in the same way that Jesus said that if you he said, you've been told thou shalt not kill.
He says, if you hate your neighbor, you've killed them already in your heart.
And I have to say that, if you want to censor your neighbor, you have killed them already in your heart.
If you want to cancel them, you've killed them already in your heart.
Censorship is violence, folks, Censorship is hate.
There was a dark cloud that came over the US when Charlie was assassinated, says Senator Katie Britton.
When Erica spoke, there was a light that broke through.
How silly when they're celebrating his death online.
What they're also saying is particularly on these college campuses, is we want to silence your vote voice.
Well, these Republican prostitutes are shouting it loud and clear.
There's not any implied silencing of voices.
They are demanding it.
We must stand up in a unifying way as Americans and say we will not tolerate that.
Tolerate what speech we disagree with.
These people are talking out of both sides of their mouth, and people think that they're conservatives.
So yeah, the anything you want to say about that, Travis or anyone read some clips there.
Speaker 6We got a lot of comments.
Be my valentine.
Charlie Kirk was all about healthy debate and intelligent dialogue, a champion for free speech.
Speaker 2Yes, we honor him by champion cancel culture and censorship.
Speaker 6Honor seeker.
If the people were properly educated, they could identify a lie and have no need to take her tact.
Speaker 2But we don't want to train people in critical thought.
We don't even want to train them in facts.
Her post was completely fact free, and she wants to say people shouldn't be allowed to put up stuff that's not true, Well, then your post needs to be taken down immediately because You don't understand the first thing about what you're talking about.
You don't understand anything about the Smith Munt Act either.
They have no.
Speaker 6Facts, ober Mensch.
That wasn't even sympathy.
That was her comedy strategy of let no good crisis go to waste.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right.
B.
T.
Speaker 6Taylor two four six.
Well, Trump is a New York socialist, so it makes sense that his supporter supports such policies.
Speaker 5That's right.
Speaker 6Gramy for God, Charlie kirk Law incoming, Rabbit Shepard.
The only thing that will fix the state of this world is a massive Christian revival, the likes of which the world has never seen.
Yep, shield your eyes, full censorship.
This is good for Israel.
Gramy for God.
They got the exact reaction they wanted.
Hadrian was right.
He recently rejected major donations for TPUSA by Netanyahu and other Jewish donor as you haven't seen that.
Speaker 2That's right, I've got that article here, and.
Speaker 6He goes, Sonita, I can't believe this is where we've gotten.
Not sure why people can't see what's going on and how the gunment used tragedies to justify taking away more and more of our rights and max because they are faux conservatives.
Stop believing people self identifying as conservatives.
Speaker 2And that's part of what you get with these these movements like Turning Point, you get this, Oh yeah, I want to be part of that club.
It becomes a fad.
And I saw somebody saying, you know, it's like what we're talking about with Taylor Swift.
Oh great, the Swifties are now going to all start getting married and having kids.
Sure that'll last about a year.
Sure their marriages probably won't last through the pregnancy period.
These are just people that follow the latest fad.
They don't know what's going on.
And if you look at that girl when I first came up on my feet and she's everywhere, it's really gone viral.
I looked at that and I thought, this is some raving leftist lunatic.
I don't want to hear her, you know, celebrate the murder of Charlie Kirk.
But then I saw comments about it, like, wait a minute, she's proposing censorship.
And that's exactly she looks and sounds exactly like the brain dead ignorant leftists, because she's a brain dead, ignorant maga cultist.
Speaker 4Yeah, it's amazing.
Put up the comment Charlie kirklaw incoming.
Yeah, just how they take, you know, the most unpatriotic laws and call it the Patriot Act.
But this is just going a step forward to take his name and put it on Such a slap in the face to him is shocking.
It's like what we were saying before with the tranny red flag law.
They wanted some way to get conservatives to support gun control.
So make the you know, problem of violent tranny is the face of it.
This is they need some way to get conservatives to support censorship and cancel culture.
So make you know, the shooting of someone that's supported free speech the face of that.
Yeah, it's the mask thing all over again.
Speaker 2Yes, right, that's right.
Yeah, they always do that.
I've said that for the longest time.
You know, when you identify a problem with your image or whatever.
And I noticed this when I was in college.
I bought a VW Rabbit.
They just come out, and I had a flyer for it.
I got the dealer and they were bragging about how the steering column was articulated so that if you had a head on collision, it would break off and not jam the steering wheel.
Into you and kill you.
Right.
Well, it turns out about a year or two down, they realized that the Volkswagen Rabbit was the very worst car out there for having the steering wheel jam into you in the front on collision and kill you.
So they identify what the problem is and rather than fix it, they claim that it does exactly the opposite.
That's the issue of the Patriot Act, that Charlie Kirk Act.
That's why they call smart cars smart cars.
That's why they call smart cities smart cities, because the smart cities are for stupid slaves, and they always counter label it.
They identify what the problem is.
They know exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 6Sorry, Travis, we finished all the comments.
Speaker 2Okay, Yeah, so there's one more and that is the one that we did not more than I want to say about what's going on with Rubio and canceling passports for American citizens.
But Jade Lenno warned that the Charlie Kirk shooting is quote, the death of free speech.
And this is a guy who could make fun of both sides when he was there.
This is, you know, this politicization that we're seeing now from Stephen Colbert and all these other people.
That was not the way that he ran it, he said.
He said, political adversaries are going to resort to killing those that they disagree with rather than engaging in debate, or you'll have Republicans who are going to kill free speech.
It's not a random shooting, he said.
I mean it's the death of free speech.
To think that you are so illiterate and so stupid that you can't answer verbally and you have to shoot somebody with a gun to win the argument, Leno said.
Or cancel them, or jail them, or deport them, as Clay Higgins and Brian mast want to do.
He said he thoroughly enjoyed debates when he was in college at Emerson University in the nineteen seventies.
He vividly remembered civil but passionate arguments between political opposites like James Baldwin and William F.
Buckley.
Those days are gone, and America is the worst for it, said Leno.
I've talked many times about how I absolutely hated the milk toast, lukewarm garbage of Time and Newsweek.
But I would get the Nation and National Review these two polar opposites and see what they had to say, I wanted to see a debate of ideas.
He said, this is this political assassination of a man who I didn't necessarily agree with, but I certainly enjoyed listening to because oh I didn't know that, okay, and I didn't have to agree on everything with Kirk.
Leno said, I mean, we're to point in this country where if you don't agree with everybody on everything, you take out a gun and you shoot them, or you cancel them like trader Clay Higgins from Louisiana.
That's the real issue, and you cancel their entire life, you shut down their business, you even take away their driver's license and so forth.
But this new bill to give Marco Rubio thought police power to revoke US passports.
This is from the intercept.
In March, Rubio stripped a Turkish doctoral student Oz Turk of her visa based on what a court later found was nothing more than her opinion piece that was critical of Israel.
Now, a bill introduced by the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee is ringing alarm bells for civil liberty's advocates, who say that it would grant Rubio the power to evoke the passports of American citizens on similar grounds.
It's being sponsored by Brian mast Republican of Florida, part of a larger state department reorganization that is set for hearing on Wednesday.
So I guess they're going to tie it in with some kind of bill that has a lot of other moving parts.
That's what they always do.
You know, you're either with us or you're with the terrorists.
Right.
His legislation says it takes aim at terrorists and traffickers.
You know, we've been at war with a tactic for a very long time because they don't want to get specific about who they're actually fighting.
If they say that this is war against terror, then they can point to anybody and accuse them of being a terrorist.
Right.
We've seen that from both Democrats and Republicans.
Remember when Biden pointed at the peaceful j six protesters and said that they were insurrectionists, and the mainstream media joined along with them.
So, therefore they are insurrectionists, and you can send them to jail for twenty or thirty years if you wish.
Critics, they could be used to deny American citizens the right to travel based solely on their speech.
You thought the no fly list was a leftist thing, didn't you.
Now they're both fine with that.
Forget about due process.
You're either with us or you are a terrorist by definition.
The Freedom of the Press Foundation said the bill will open the door to thought policing at the hands of one individual.
See that's the other thing, that's the loss of due process.
You have these star chamber procedures.
This is just like the FISA Court.
PISA Court is not a court.
It's one judge who says there right.
It takes place in secret.
You're not allowed to know the charges against you, even if you know that they put you on a no flight list.
You're not allowed to find out why you're put on a no fly list.
You're not allowed to call witnesses in your defense.
You're not allowed to have the due process of a trial.
This is a determination made in absentia, secretly done, and there is no response to it.
Marco Rubio has claimed the power to designate people to be the terrorst supporters based solely on what they think and say.
Because they think and say differently than Marco Rubio.
We don't even have to get caught up in what the issues at hand are.
It's the principles that are involved.
I don't care if he's censoring people because they're for Israel or if they're censoring them because they're against Israel.
It's the principle that is involved, even if what they say doesn't include a word about a terrorist organization or about ten terrorism.
Brian Mast for his part, has publicly voice to support for a quote kicking terrorist sympathizers out of our country.
And this is just like the people say, well, I want to take down all the false news and all the fake news.
Who are you to decide and on what basis do you decide something is true or false?
There's no due process involved.
Who are you to point at somebody you point a news organization or or a poster on social media, say that's false.
I'm going to cancel your life, or you point to them and say you're a terrorist.
I'm going to jail you for life, I'm going to ban your travel for life, or I'm going to kill you.
How is that any different?
Speaker 4Left has been using Nazi as the vague term that they throw at anyone they disagree with to excuse anything they do to them for a long time.
I guess now the right has terrorists as its equivalent.
Speaker 2That's right.
It's like racist, right, Oh, you're racist.
The left will call people racist, the right will call them anti Semitic, same and they do it as a beard.
Terror convictions come with a stiff prison sentence, and pre trial defendants are typically denied a bail.
So what is the purpose of this, Right, you're going to stop people who are accused of terrorism from traveling, except usually they're either in prison or have been convicted and are in jail, or they are in jail without bail awaiting a trial.
So you're going to take their passport?
What is that about?
Clearly there is something else involved here, right, So that section that grants the Secretary of State the power to evoke or refuse to issue passports is not what this is about.
There is another section, and it sidesteps the legal process entirely.
The Secretary of State would be able to deny passports to people whom they determine quote have knowingly aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise provided material support to an organization the Secretary has designated as a foreign terrorist organisation.
Well, if you talk about material support, that can be and we have seen that material support for terrorists.
It was first passed after the Oklahoma City bombing, and it was toughened after the nine to eleven attacks.
The Supreme Court ruled in twenty ten that even offering advice about international law to designated terror groups could be classified as material support.
So I guess it's going to arrest all the lawyers.
The government even deemed a woman who was kidnapped and forced to cook and clean for Salvador and guerrillas.
They labeled her as a material supporter of terrorism in order to justify her deportation so citizens would be granted.
Here's the thing they said, Well, you got a right to appeal.
Who do you appeal to the same person that led Jew a terrorist?
Marco Rubio.
There's no appeal to another organization to a court.
It's you have to your your appeal is limited to the guy who labeled you a terrorist without due process in the first place, and you've only got sixty days to do it.
This is just crazy.
We've got people in the Republican Party climbing over each other to be the newest and baddest dictator or tzar.
Isn't it amazing?
Basically, you can go back to the secretary who's already made this determination, and you can try to appeal to him.
Why are we setting up systems like this?
These are systems that are set up for dictatorial tyranny.
Folks, By its very structure, there is no standard set and there is nothing, and you can't appeal to anyone that's different other than your accuser.
Imagine that if somebody actually provided material support for terrorism, that there would be an instance where it wouldn't be prosecuted.
It just doesn't make sense.
So we know that this is about something else.
This is about intimidating and harming people over their speech.
It appears that the right is so convinced that it will never be out of power that the idea that one day the shoe might be on the other foot doesn't even resonate with them.
As I said, these are people forget about forty chess.
They can't think four years ahead.
What is to stop a future Democrat administration from designating an anti abortion activist or a supporter of West Bank settlements, or an anti vaxer to be a supporter of terrorism and target them the same way.
This list is endless.
Look, I have been accused because I pose the vaccine because I pose the masks and the lockdowns.
I've been accused, even by people of the right like Scott Adams, of being a sociopath.
I've been accused by people on the left of wanting to kill people because I said that these absurd regulations that we weren't going to help anybody, and we should work and we should not comply with them.
As a matter of fact, we should not just passively go away, but we should actively push back against it.
So I've been accused of that.
I was canceled for that.
This is coming, folks, and both the left and the right are doubling down on this at a very rapid rate.
They both are one hundred percent intolerant of anything that they disagree with.
And as one person pointed out, Charlie Kirk recently refused funding from net yahou and this is coming from the gray zone.
Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from net Yahoo to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into Turning Point USA.
In the past, when he began, he did get a lot of money from Israel, and he has been a ally of Israel since then.
But he was starting to pull back.
According to Kirk's friend, who also enjoyed access to Trump in his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel's behalf.
Charlie was the only person who did that, they said, recalling how Trump barked at him quote unquote in response and angrily shut down the conversation.
The source believes that the incident confirmed in Kirk's mind that the president had fallen under the control of align foreign power and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.
And the thing is, didn't we know that about Trump before the twenty twenty four election, even before the twenty twenty election.
Why would you support a monster like that?
Kirk was eighteen years old when he launched TPUSA in twenty twelve.
From its inception, his career was propelled by Zionist donors who showered his young organization with money through neo conservative outlets like the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless fire hose of anti Palestinian and Islamophobic dietribes, says The Freethought Project, Accepting propaganda trips to Israel and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel and Trump.
During TPUSA events, few American gentiles had proved more valuable to the self proclaimed Jewish state than Charlie Kirk.
But as Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza drove an unprecedented backlash within grassroots right wing circles, where only twenty four percent of younger Republicans now sympathized with Israel over the Palestinians, Kirk began to shift.
I have to say though that and they finished this with the Freethought Project article that there's currently no evidence of an Israeli government role in Kirk's assassination, and I think we should wait for that to surface if it does.
If it's there.
However, that has not stopped thousands of social media users from speculating that the pro Trump operatives shifting views on the issue contributed in some way to his death.
By the time of the publication, over one hundred thousand Twitter and ex users have liked a September eleventh post by influencer and Carol And that's the key.
He's an influencer.
What did I say about influencers.
Last week, these are people who just call him a propagandist, call him a nudger.
Okay, nudge news from Ian Carrol who said he was their friend.
He basically dedicated his life to them, and they murdered him in front of his family.
Israel just shot themselves, he said.
And again we will talk about some of the conspiracy theories that have come out.
I'm going to say that we need to wait until there is more evidence of it.
My key is I think that just as we needed to, we could see that the obvious direction that they were going was a nine to eleven act.
Even if September eleventh had been what they said it was, the one hundred and eighty degree wrong approach was the Patriot Act in this decoration of infinite war.
And so again, these Charlie Kirk acts, regardless of what happened, are exactly the wrong thing.
Time will tell, and you know, we will continue to look at this.
So far, I've not seen any convincing evidence of these conspiracy theories.
Speaker 6Have you, No, I haven't seen anything that is hard evidence.
People just wildly speculating about the things.
Yeah, I've seen a lot of different videos on a bunch of different topics, and it's just not one has had any good evidence.
It's all just well look at this and look at that.
Isn't that something?
Yeah, I've seen a lot, really.
Speaker 4A lot of people pointing out strange things, but we don't have any actual explanations for any of it.
And in an actual shooting, there would be strange things.
Speaker 6Is a strange event, Strange things happen around strange events.
Speaker 4I'm not saying for certain that it is legitimate.
Certainly now there's more and more questions, but we just need to hold off and not jump the gun.
Speaker 2Yeah, there's a lot of things, as you point out last week, lands the fact that they didn't have some of these things ready to go, I mean it took them whole to jump in on this canceled stuff, right, And a lot of that is just anger and reactionary, reactionary response to what's going on, because as you point out, it truly was disgusting.
You know, anybody that can look at that shooting of Charlie Kirk and come away cheering from that is really twist.
But we have a lot of really twisted people, and that's no reason to get rid of the first Amendments, just like it's no reason to get rid of the Second Amendment.
Yeah, they're going to be crazy, violent, hateful people out there, but let's not hate the system that you know, we do need to have a Christian society or we're not going to be able to use the constitutional republic that they gave us.
As John Adams said, paraphrasing him, it only works for a moral people.
And how are we losing our moral foundation?
We're going to talk about that when we come back.
Speaker 5Stay with us.
Speaker 1Making sense common again.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 7Wait a minute, where am I?
Speaker 8Sorry, Jefferson, the scoundrels who put America on Central Bank Fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
Despicable.
Speaker 7This is outrageous, Washington.
I spent my life fighting centralized power.
Now the Federal Reserve monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
Tell me there's some good news to all this.
Speaker 8Well, there is a coin they can't control, one that isn't backed by the FED, but backed by the Fed up the All New David Night Show Commemorative coin.
Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
Speaker 7They say, money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
The Truth doesn't need inflation only support.
Speaker 1You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6Welcome back, folks.
We got a lot of comments here tofi tire At seventeen seventy six says Trump wants martial law in America.
He benefits from Kirk's death.
Speaker 2Yes, absolutely, yeah, he is the guy to bring us chaos and division.
Speaker 4Yeah, and we're talking about motives for his killing, and certainly there were some clips I was surprised to see of him criticizing Israel shortly before his death.
So that's a motive.
But there are other groups with motives, and oh yeah, they are other people with assassins.
So let's look at every possibility carefully.
Speaker 2If we speak about politics and religion, you're going to attract a lot of haters.
That's absolutely true.
Yeah, we know.
Speaker 6That, right, Yeah, Guard Goldsmith, and what Clay Higgins wants, what so many maga want, is precisely the threat the unconstitutional FCC holds over broadcasters every day.
Speaker 2Yes, thanking Guard again.
Liberty conspiracies where you find guard yes.
Speaker 6And lack of challenge.
The very idea of the SEC is the core, the alpha in this mindset.
If the GOP will not question that on moral and constitutional grounds, the rest follow censorship and propaganda.
Speaker 2Yes, I mean the FCC was originally there to allocate frequency spectrums, which is just like you know, recording deeds or something, right, but they've made the leap from say a bureaucracy that's going to record who owns this area.
Let's say talking about that is the electromagnetic frequency, which is geographically based, you know, for terrestrial transmissions and stuff.
They're metastasizing from that to deciding that they're going to tell you how you can use that land or how you can use that frequency.
Speaker 6Got shield your eyes.
Israel loss the information war, so they had to do something drastic to usher in full spectrum censorship.
And again it's very possible Israel was involved, but until there's any hard evidence, just be careful about what you claim and where you say it.
Speaker 2Just to yeah, well, it works against us if we jump to conclusions and get it wrong, right, because apart from government censorship and things like that, we have to be credible, and so we don't want to jump into something that we can't prove that it's simply speculation.
And that's the most important that it's important for all of us.
It's important not just for us here, but for you as well.
You don't want to jump into things that and then find out later that it was you were being had by somebody.
Speaker 6If I'm trying to change people's minds, if you're trying to get people to see that the government is the enemy and needs to be watched, and anything of that nature, it behooves you to be even more cautious and more circumspect, because one thing you get wrong allows people to discount you in time.
Speaker 2Yeah, you have to always bring that up.
They will always bring that up.
Speaker 6When you're working in this kind of field, when you're dealing with these kinds of topics, you have to be extremely, extremely cautious about what you say and when.
Speaker 4And I put that comment up when you're talking about censorship of Gaza.
I'm not sure if that was in reference to that.
It might have been in reference to the Charlie Kirk things, since that's what we're primarily talking about.
Speaker 6But again, I'm personally of the opinion that the the left has a lot of very mentally ill, insane people, and the trans community has been radicalizing itself and they're continually taking medications and SSRIs and all kinds of different things.
I don't think, you know, they need any help to want to kill Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 2They've gotten plenty of help from pharmaceutical companies and schools.
Speaker 6There has never been, in my opinion, a more insane subgroup of people.
These people are absolutely nuts.
It's I mean, they want to mutilate themselves, they want to mutilate children.
And if that isn't pure evil, I don't know what is.
So that's just my opinion.
So look at nineteen eighty.
Who's in charge of turning Point USA.
Now is that person speaking up against the proposed censorship as Charlie would.
Speaker 2Have Well, that would be his wife.
And you know she is right now, very distraught, very angry.
From what I could say, she is not speaking up against any of these calls for censorship and cancel and cancel, canceling, cancelization, canceling people and Charlie's name.
Hopefully she will come to her senses after the grief and oppose that.
Speaker 6So look at nineteen eighty read that one guard Goldsmith.
I noticed some conservatives also criticizing private business owners who fire people for their statements, but that is their right with contracts for government to stop that as ano their form of suppression by government.
And that's kind of where I stand.
I think that if I do think personally, there needs to be some kind of societal punishment for these people, but it needs to come from the grassroots, needs to come from the companies themselves.
So they don't want to be affiliated with these types of people, it is again their right to disenfranchise them from employment, get.
Speaker 2You fire, and if people don't like what they're doing it, I know what the government cracker barrel or whatever right you make.
Speaker 6You make your stance known as an individual, do not get the government involved.
Speaker 2Yeah, so these people, we all understand in a company that we operate at the pleasure of the person who owns a company.
I understood that info wars right.
As a matter of fact, I was even told by Daria, you know, stop criticizing Steve Achennik's the sting, but then Alex kept having him on.
Every time he would put him on, I would criticize it because I didn't want to see people deceived about that kind of stuff.
But I know I was going to be fired.
As a matter of fact, I thought I was going to be fired him outh earlier, and when it didn't happen, I thought, well, I guess you're not going to fire I got caught a surprise.
But uh, but yeah, it was that was not an issue.
I criticized what he's doing before he fired me, so I understood that he's likely to fire me.
But uh, you know that's that's his right to do it.
I have no I'm not bitter or angry about that.
What I'm upset about that's what he did to the people at January the sixth.
Speaker 6Never once complained about the firing at the behest of Alex if he wanted to fire us for any reason, he could have its right as the employer.
That's just how it is.
Speaker 2And I just got you fired.
Speaker 6Though at the same time, it was collateral damage.
Speaker 2Yeah, the two of us.
He was paying us so much money that it was going to bring the company down, even though he'd had a record year.
Right.
Speaker 6But yeah, if you know personally, you know, if you have someone who's like who's a doctor or in some kind of field where they're providing care.
If they're out there celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, do you think they're going to provide you good care if you walk in you an American flag t shirt?
Is something as simple as that.
These people see this as a symbol of hate if that's what their job is, you know, Star Barkley, I'm repeating what someone said.
If you shoot the person with a microphone, you've lost the debate.
Speaker 2Right And now we have a Republican congressmen and Marco Rubio who wanted to shoot the people with the microphones, people with the social media accounts.
Can't let them speak.
You know that immediately makes you stop and think, well, wait a minute, you know, what is it that they're trying to cover up here?
Let's get to the heart of the issue.
A lot of people are talking about all these different knock on effects and they want to address the symptoms, but not the root of the cause.
What is the root of the cause?
I've said before, but I'm the only one I hear saying this.
Maybe I'm wrong if I'm the only one who thinks this.
I think that the root of this are government schools.
Government schools are the root of this.
This is where the recruitment is coming.
I just look at them.
Last week or so, we've had reports about in California and Newsom they've got new law saying that you cannot tell parents if you've been able to gas sight a kid into transitioning to a different gender.
You can't tell the parents.
It's forbidden.
And you've got some teachers and what were they, I think they were in Massachusetts maybe, but two teachers have filed a lawsuit because they were fired and because they would not lie to the parents about what the school was doing to their child in terms of gender gas lighting.
And so that's really the issue of folks.
And I understand that there's a lot of effects out there.
You have video games, you have the entertainment industry, you've got mass media, and all those are also influences as well.
But I still say the primary influence that is pushing all this stuff are the schools.
They're the ones who are pushing the pronoun policing.
They're the ones who are covering it up from the parents.
They are desperate to do this.
This is flowing through the schools, and of course it's when the kids are young and impressionable that they can have the most effect.
That's why they're doing it through the schools.
Teachers are facing backlash and termination for mocking Charlie Kirk's murder.
Well, again, that's not addressing the real problem.
The teachers are just the boots on the ground.
It's the institution that is creating this kind of mindset and these schools that are seminaries for trainees, furrees, socialists, and atheists.
Social media posts mocking the murder of Charlie Kirk have led to the firing, suspension, and public condemnation of several educators nationwide.
The list is expected to grow, and yet the institution is the issue, not the foot soldiers.
Yes, the foot soldiers are an issue.
I'm not saying they're not.
But you know, let's not you know, start picking them off one by one.
We've got to go to the heart of the issue, the root of the issue.
That means we need to have radical change.
Folks.
What does radical mean, Well, it comes from the fray ratics, which is Latin for root.
That's what radical change is.
It's getting at the root of the issue.
We need to have radical change.
We need to completely separate government and education.
For all the same reasons that we separate official state churches.
Because what the schools are doing is they're seminaries for an official religion.
What is that secular humanism, atheism, trainingism, furiism.
I mean, it's all there.
It's insanity.
If you start missing yeah, if you start messing with people's sexual orientation, telling them that they're in the wrong body, I mean, you have now created You've got a person that's in a state of flux and confusion, and you can move them any way that you want to politically.
That's why the sexual stuff is so important to them and why they will not give it up.
I mean, it is a god to them that they fiercely worship.
For that very same reason, they get the kids at a very young age and confuse them sexually.
That is such a primal motivator of human beings, and if you start messing with that and switching people around, then you can do anything to them.
It's a real mind control.
Speaker 6It's also important to point out that public schooling is inherently a collectivist by nature, and as such, it really will never be able to be utilized to, you know, teach people to be individualistic.
You have to have a curriculum that is distributed evenly throughout all these schools.
And since public school has to be funded by the government, you'll always have these people that are going to be there and lobby for more funding.
Speaker 2It is always going to worship the state, worship the collective.
And so I say about public health, public school, right, public health, Oh, we want the health of well what is the health of public If you're going to ignore the health of individuals?
Speaker 6If you were to have all public school that was there preaching individualism and some form of libertarianism or anything along those lines, it would eventually abolish itself.
People would come out of it and go, well, actually, we don't need this and it's not going to do that.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right.
Some teachers have posted hateful and snarky comments online.
Five educators of face professional consequences and public outrage for their statements about Kirk's assassination.
Again, most young voters, however, want to redistribute wealth.
See I said, they're Marxist seminaries, and this is the key thing.
The Marxists want to separate you from God.
They want to separate you from each other.
They want to separate you from any physical reality, even about your body, so that they can come after in these other areas.
And again, did turning point turn this around?
No, No, they never focused on defunding the schools.
That's the root issue.
You can go to the schools and you can argue with the people that are there, and there's a lot of merit to that.
I'm not saying that wasn't important.
But why not go for radical change?
Why not try to shut down these corrupted institutions which, as Travis pointed out, will never support individual freedom.
They will never support liberty.
They're always is going to be socialist and collectivist.
The survey of twelve hundred and one students found that fifty five percent of voters under forty would support laws that confiscate second homes, luxury cars, and private boats in order to help people buy a first home.
Twenty five percent of those in favor say they would quote strongly support such laws.
Only thirty eight percent of voters would oppose them.
So we got like sixty two percent two thirds.
So yeah, let's take people's stuff to help me, right.
It is a philosophy that is based on envy and covetousness.
It is a philosophy of theft, Socialists and Marxists are thieves.
Sixty two percent of young voters believe the economy is unfair to young people.
Young Americans are facing real financial pressures and housing insecurity.
But what's most concerning is that many are turning toward dangerous collectivist ideas as supposed solutions.
Like I said, it's because socialism is based on envy and on covetousness.
More than half of them support wealth confiscation to buy homes, and it shows just how far radical policies have penetrated mainstream thinking among voters under forty.
Why is that, Well, because the institutions, the schools were always set up as in doctrination centers.
It's just that lately they have really accelerated it and pushed it very, very hard.
Speaker 6I also have a clip in the stream deck that was he finished this article.
I think dovetails into it nicely put it together last night.
Is that the Hanson Piker Hassan Piker.
Yeah, this is by the way, chenk Uger's nephew, And for those who don't know, he's one of the biggest streamers on Twitch.
He's into politics and he's a validly a socialist and calls himself a propagandist, and he appeals to a young audience.
Speaker 2So he's the nephew thinker of the young turds.
Yeah, so this guy is a young turd as well.
Speaker 1Again.
Speaker 2Yeah, okay, let's play Hassan.
Speaker 9I'm sticking tired of it.
Left wingers, liberals, do you need to be and showing your opponent's guts on there?
Speaker 2Okay?
Speaker 9You need to be gutting them.
You need to be shanking these motherfuckers and letting their fucking letting their intestines just ride on stage.
What man, slice them and dice them?
What the fuck is this?
You cannot have a bigger layup.
You could not have had a bigger fucking layup than a horrible candidate like herschel Walker.
Speaker 10Eight seven four belveem drive and I'm gonna kill you with my ar fifteen Like that's what the That's the type of messages they were leaving in these dudes.
All the dude's office and he's resigning like he's literally because he's his last girm.
So so I think that people are a lot more radical.
Speaker 9It's hurt poor people that they can they they can afford housing in Berkeley.
Speaker 2I don't know how well.
Speaker 6My understanding is that the property owners who have properties there choose just not to rend it at all.
Speaker 9Yeah, kill them, kill those mother Murder those mothers in the street, Let the streets, Let the streets soak in their red capitalist bloods.
Speaker 11Dude, there was a moment of silence my socialism on the House floor in Washington for Charlie Kirk just moments ago, bipartisan calls to calm this down, to bring the rhetoric down in this country again, there was a moment of silence with that dude.
Speaker 12By the way, right wingers saying oh, we got to tone down the rhetoric once again is an insane statement here, Okay, It's like people who prepared to are most responsible for setting up an an environment where violence and instability is the norm for everyday Americans.
Meanwhile, while they're talking about toning down the rhetoric of violence, Elon Musk, the owner of this website, took no time, Like, didn't even wait for the confirmation of Charlie Kursdad, immediately go the left is the party of murder.
Speaker 9Let the streets soak in their red capitalist bloods.
Speaker 2Dude, good job, Travis.
Yeah.
Well, you know, let's just remember that it was the Turks versus the Armenians that was the first case of labeled as genocide, and that shows the hatred of the Islamic street towards their enemies.
But this guy has mixed the hatred of Islam with a hatred of Marxism and that shows doesn't He's.
Speaker 6A complete Champagne socialist.
He's a multi multi millionaire born on Third Base to rich parents that I believe his father was some sort of banker defense contractor in Turkey, and he is one of the main he's one of the biggest Twitch streamers.
You know, tens of thousands of people watch him when he's live.
And this is the sort of thing that's not just schools, but they're propagandists everywhere.
Again, don't let your kid have unrestricted access to the Internet.
These people are out there and they are and.
Speaker 2If somebody is calling for a murder and revolution of whatever, I mean, there's laws on the books.
You don't have to destroy the First Amendment.
Speaker 4Yes, And someone's comment was, you know, there was the back and forth of whether the shooter was a leftist or on the right or all this stuff for a while, and someone had a really good comment.
It's like, what the left doesn't seem to appreciate is that at this point the shooter's motives aren't all that important relative to the reaction that we've seen from so many.
Speaker 6People on the raft is shown on the right.
Speaker 4This widespread acceptance of this is common on the left.
Speaker 2And so yeah, we're saying that that there's a less and less difference between the left and the right at the grassroots level, isn't there?
The survey's responses are not theoretical.
Socialist figures like New York City mayor may oral candidate Mom Danny and Minneapolis mayoral candidate Omar Fata are being boosted primarily by young voters.
Ma'am Donnie, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, is supported by seventy eight percent of New Yorkers under forty five and is projected to win the race.
The Ugandan native has promised free public transportation, frozen rent prices.
Why not just make it free?
Why for you just make rent free?
Speaker 1Yeah?
Speaker 6Come on, stop with the.
Speaker 2Hack, go full communists here, universal childcare, medical mutilation for miners packaged as gender affirming care.
Is vowed to defund the police, tax the rich, and tax white people.
He's a racist.
In twenty twenty one, he proposed seizing the means of production, helping to elect more socialists and boycotting Israel.
Socialist Bernie Sanders has enthusiastically endorsed him.
So where do these people come from?
Well, they come from the schools.
Why should we be Why should we be surprised when the schools run by the government praise the government and want a stronger, more centralized government.
And why should we be surprised when the kids coming out of it win.
Two thirds of them say that they want to take what you've got so they can get what they want, okay, because they're theft.
The schools are based on theft.
Property taxes are theft.
Property taxes mean that you can never own anything, and that's what funds the schools.
Schools are therefore theft.
What if the obstacle to home ownership is not the rich people, but what if it's the theft?
In order to fund these socialist seminaries that we call government schools, Ron DeSantis is putting on the ballot next year a referendum that would abolish or restrict local governments from taxing owner occupied homes.
This is an article from Jeffrey Tucker.
He said this could fundamentally disrupt the way that schools and local governments are financed.
Texas is also considering the same path.
And if you remember, Donald Rainwater, who ran as a libertarian in Indiana, had a great proposal me.
He even thought about how we're going to fix the sales tax thing.
He said, make it seven percent, and you can pay it at the time of closing.
They can fold it in, you can pay it off over thirty years, or you can pay one percent a year for seven years and then you're done.
None of this stuff about paying it forever, none of this stuff about paying it on some imaginary appreciation of your value.
You're being taxed on the inflation that's being created by the government that is making the dollar value of your house go up.
You know, you look at a house and I don't know, I guess my parents bought built the house in nineteen fifty five.
It was like five or six thousand dollars, you know, and then later on it's like maybe you know, I don't know what it was worth, but you know it wasn't worth twenty or thirty times or whatever it was.
You know it was at that point in time.
It was thirty years old when they went to sell it and have long been paid off.
But the property taxes were based on the inflated value because of the dollar losing its value.
So he Tucker says, if this spreads to more states, it would amount to a revolution in public financing.
But it would amount to a revolution folks in public education.
We need to stop paying for these these seminaries of socialism.
He says, it's long overdue.
These tax schemes are brutal on home ownership.
Indeed, it's hard to say that you ever really are the owner of your home if you're having to pay rent to the government every year, and if they can raise that at will, and of course you know we've all seen this.
The game is, you know, one year they raise the assumed value of the house, and then another year they raise the tax rate.
But they never do both of them at the same time.
So they'll always say, yeah, we didn't change that part of it, you know.
But these two things that multiply out with each other, they are always raising one or the other every year.
Home valuation goes up every year, so does the tax that you will in the place.
You've done nothing but live there and enjoy life, and it's older, but the tax keeps going up.
It's entirely paid off.
Meanwhile, the government keeps coming after you with ever more pressing demands for money.
You can't really say that you are an owner of anything under these conditions.
So when I hear about how this will save thirty four hundred dollars on average in Florida, I nearly faint.
In my area of the country, this would be pennies.
Property taxes in New England can be twenty to forty thousand dollars, and that's not unusual.
And same thing in Texas.
Around cities like Austin, you know, you see the same kind of confiscatory tax, especially because they don't have an income tax, so they lean heavily into the property taxes.
There.
Friends of mine are paying thirty thousand dollars in property taxes plus seventy thousand dollars per kid for private schools for three kids others they don't want to use the government schools of these property taxes are paying for.
I find it all unfathomable.
But that's how New England works.
And so he said, how all this is happened?
Why is all this happening now?
We might ask, well, he said, the answer traces back to school closures of twenty twenty and twenty twenty one, a dramatically reduced confidence in the public schooling system, hence the way they're financed.
If millions of people are home schooling and millions more are attending newly established private schools, the political pressure forever higher property taxes is thereby reduced.
I've mentioned many times as I really love the analogy that Alex Newman used.
He said, you have to understand, these government schools are burning buildings.
The first thing you do is you get your child out of there.
You work with members of the community to put the fire out before it burns down the community.
These schools, with their training socialism and their furries and all the rest of this stuff, their drugs and sex, they are burning down our communities and we need to stop having our not being able to own any property because of them.
As well, public schools that rely on income taxes are being depleted of students and teachers, with ever fewer schools to finance it.
Makes perfect sense that people would start asking profound questions about the property tax system as well.
If you get your kids out, you get enough people homeschooling, they're going to look at this and saying, why am I paying for this?
And again it goes back to what Jefferson said about the free exercise of religion.
He said, at the time when we had established religion through churches instead of established religion through schools, he said, you know a lot of these different places, you were required to attend a church, even if you didn't agree with them, and even if they were enlightened enough to not require attendance, you still had to send them money.
And that's where we are today.
You can opt out of the system, and if you can afford it, you can put your kids in private school or you can homeschool them, but you still have to pay to this state religion.
And he said it is an abomination to require people to pay to support things that they adamantly oppose.
And folks, I adamantly oppose what they teach in school.
It's in doctrination.
It's not education.
These people don't learn anything.
As I mentioned last week, the debate of some guy who claimed that he was an economics professor with Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk threw him a lot of names of economists, and this guy had never heard of any of them, except for Kaine's John Maynard Keynes, which they doubled down.
So they found.
People found during lockdown that they're feeding their children into a system that teaches in a way contrary to their own home life, sometimes even endangering their children with creepy views on gender and sexuality.
And I've been saying this for the longest time.
I tell people that, and they would not believe that it was happening in their child's classroom, even if they could see it was happening everywhere else, you know, and they could see that it was happening in their state, they could see what was happening in their school district, They could even see that it was happening in their school, but they wouldn't believe it it was happening in their child's classroom until the lockdown.
Then they could see it.
So this was really a turning point.
Yeah, it was the real turning point, you know, not arguing with the products of the system, but getting to the root of the system that is creating these kids who would argue with Charlie Kirk and who would kill him.
That's what you have to get at the Northern States, says Tucker.
It will be a long time for such reforms to arrive.
This is Jeffrey Tucker.
Many cities are stuck in to catch twenty two situation.
Property taxes are too high to attract residents, their underperforming schools are voracious, and their consumption of tax dollars.
It's not likely that the schools will get better with less revenue, so that leaves cities with a huge problem.
Yeah, well we have to understand that.
Again, even Jeffrey Tucker has not really come to terms with what the schools are really about.
No matter how much money you pour into it, they are not going to teach children basic facts and they're not going to teach them the morality that they need for us to function as a society.
Speaker 6That is it's goal right now.
Its goal is to create dumb Marxists.
Is doing a magnificent job at it.
That's all they can create.
Speaker 2Yes, it takes a village to create an army of Marxists.
The only real path for reform these northern cities is to deregulation schooling itself.
No government must have no role.
You must have a separation of education and state for all the same reasons that you have a separation of church and state.
And I understand that's not in the Constitution, But the disestablishment of education by the state is what I'm talking about, because that is essentially a religion.
It is an established religion that even if you don't have to attend their seminary, you still have to pay for the seminary.
Taxation is ultimately the use of for says Jeffrey Tucker.
If you don't pay, government can take what is yours and can convict you of a crime.
For that reason, taxation should only be used when there is no other option and the thing that it funds cannot be otherwise provided through market means.
You know, we had a population that was far, far, far more educated and literate all throughout up to the early twentieth century when all this nonsense began, and so we know that that is not necessary.
The schools are not necessary, especially as government schools are not necessary for education.
This is also a compassionate strategy for public management.
Knowing the difference between mine and thine is a foundational principle of civilization.
So what do you expect from an institution that's based on the theft of taxation?
Of course, it's going to produce people that think that they're entitled to steal even more from you, And it all feeds off of theft, and they push socialism and sexual depravity and insanity to in political violence.
The Marxist framework that legitimizes it must be rooted out.
This is John Milton or sorry Hilton Brian via the Epic Times.
Well, the way that you root out that framework, the framework is a schools, and you need to defund those schools.
Speaker 6Yeah, anything other than that is a half measure.
Speaker 2And will be that's right, sectual, that's right.
Speaker 6It will eventually, even if you were to root out every single Marxist teacher in the system, because it is inherently, as I pointed out before, collectivists, they'll work their way back in.
You cannot police these teachers twenty four to seven.
Are you going to have one to one?
You know you're gonna have a conservative sitting there watching what they teach twenty You can't do that.
Speaker 2So when I started putting in some education reform in Texas.
You had these teachers going on social media proudly saying they can't control why I teach in the class women, They're absolutely right, I'm gonna teach what I want.
Speaker 6You would have to again double school staff.
You would have to have one person, you know, libertarian, sitting there watching them every moment of every day that they're teaching.
And it's just not feasible.
It is simply not feasible to do that.
Speaker 2Yes, so this article was picked up by zero Hedge.
Is based on the government's own fantasy narrative.
So, the original post republic education was born of a revival of classical learning and insisted that young people be taught to love truth rather than their own factions.
It was a genuine attempt to train the passions of young citizens towards virtue.
Folks, this is a total fantasy.
This is what the government schools want you to think.
The government schools are about.
They never were about that.
If you look at the writings of the people that set this up, people like Courseman, people like Thomas Dewey, it was always set up to change the kids from the values of their parents, and changing them from their gender is just the logical conclusion of all this stuff, if.
Speaker 4You feel like the schools have really helped revive classical learning.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right.
Yeah.
The most disturbing part is that the Marxist framework is not confined to radical academics or activists.
Used to be just the universities, but now it's actively taught in the lower schools, just like sexual depravity and all of it taught at a very early age.
When a teacher introduces Marxist analysis, it feels like sharing a secret.
Suddenly the teacher and student are in on something together, a hidden truth about how the world really works.
That dynamic transforms relationship and folks, that is exactly what we see with the sexual groomers in the schools.
She don't tell your parents, but I'm in on this secret with you.
You're actually in the wrong body.
Teachers become allies against parents.
This is how education cultivates political violence instead of virtue.
In Cyprus, whole generations were taught to see their neighbors as enemies.
The result was decades of recurring conflict.
The same seeds are being planted here in our own schools under the banner of equity and critical thinking, and you are kept from owning a home so that this can happen.
This is how thoroughly they have a controlled us.
And to the extent that even this guy again nobody wants to talk about the real cause of all this, which is the fundamental cause, is the government running education, and he needs to be separated away from that.
Once young people accept this worldview, they no longer see opponents as neighbors or fellow citizens.
They see them as enemies.
Once that shift occurs, political violence is no longer shocking to them.
It can be rationalized and even praised.
And folks, we're not that far when you look at the rhetoric now that people feel justified in saying because in response to the criticism and the cheering and of Charlie Kirk and the cheering of his death.
When you look at the harsh things are being said by people like Clay Jinkin, of Clay Higgins and things like that, it is it's going to be surfacing in the right as well.
There's absolutely no reason to think that it wouldn't.
Human nature says that it will.
The script is not picked up by accident.
The script is taught.
It is being reinforced every time a classroom divides the world into oppressors and the oppressed.
That's Marxism for sure.
We will not end political violence and toy root out the Marxist framework that legitimizes it.
And that framework, folks, is the institution of the public school.
And if you don't want to talk about ending government schools and government involvement and education, you don't understand what the problem is, and you're just gonna be propagating it.
Comments.
Speaker 6Yeah, you cannot.
As we've been pointing out, you cannot get rid of this ideology until you get rid of the schools.
They are a seminary for it.
They preach nothing but Marxism and LGBT, which are both to just self indulgent, satanic ideologies that lead to self destruction.
Florid Patriot, I love the David Night Show, but waiting for these uncredible and corrupt local federal law enforcement entities to give us the truth is wild.
Speaker 2Well that's not what I'm talking about.
Yeah, Yeah, Have they ever told us the truth about nine to eleven?
No, but there are plenty of people out there investigating it who have told is the truth?
The truth is there.
We've seen the truth.
There's been many documentaries on it.
We've talked about it forever.
Will they ever tell you the truth about nine to eleven or Jeffrey Epstein or any the rest of this stuff?
Of course not.
But we don't need to rely on the government to tell us the truth.
We can figure it out for ourselves, and investigators can.
I'm just saying there's not sufficient evidence yet, and I'm not expecting it's ever going to come out of the officials.
Speaker 13I'm just urging caution.
When you speculate, don't jump the shark.
Yeah, you don't give them ammunition to use against you.
You can by jumping into something that seems plausible, but you haven't seen the evidence.
Speaker 6It's all blow a hole in your own credibility and make yourself ineffectual at reaching people.
If you were you know, something comes out that has proven true and you know you speculated wildly about something else, and just that's all emerging.
It's just be cautious and be wise about the things you say and how you say it timed non tides.
If government is coercing, bribing, bullying private enterprise, that makes them an agent of the state.
No, that's how they forced masks and jabs Shelley A, How the hell does your company know what you said in a dumb expost?
Well, actually, a lot of companies when they hire you now demand to be able to look at your social media.
They want access to all of it.
The chances are they then regularly check up on what you said.
There's also the fact that a lot of people are going in and reporting what people are saying to companies.
They're taking screenshots and saying, this person said this online.
Speaker 2You really want them working for you, and the reporters might be government.
You know, when I spend a long time on the phone PayPal and Vemo actually not Vemo or PayPal because Vemo's owned by PayPal, and they both bade me at the same time.
The person finally came back and is the only thing I can find is that there's a message, you know, delete this account immediately.
So who would put out something like that that would have that kind of weight that they would follow through on it.
You know, it wasn't coming from my.
Speaker 6Employer, the real Octo spook.
Speaker 4I felt that it's also just good logical step to not use your real name for most of these accounts that you're on, like it's become a normal thing to just have way too much personal information online.
Speaker 2Yeah that's right.
Yeah, that's what Facebook was set up for, the dumb facers as a Zugerberger like they call them.
Speaker 6Yeah, the real octo spook.
The teachers Junior is composed of a majority of nutters.
Shutting down the teachers union be a step in the right direction.
Well, you get rid of schools, you get rid of the teachers' union.
Yeah, take one, rabbit, Shepherd.
The state of our schools is a symptom of the sin our society is involved with.
Yes, yes, society gets more to praved.
The schools automatically get more depraved.
Christian cost social conservatives.
Speaker 4And it's also the other way around that the state of the schools is a big factor in driving the state of society.
Speaker 6Yeah, it's a circular feedback loop.
Christian social conservative did it on the schools?
Parents must empty the schools?
Speaker 2Yes, yes, And that's what he was talking about, how people once they saw what was happening in the classroom on a regular basis, they took the kids out.
There needs to be more of that.
I'm surprised that there hasn't been more of it.
As a matter of fact, well, we got want to thank a citizen of America KAKA.
Thank you very much for subscribing on kick Appreciate that.
We're gonna take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1You're listening to the David Night Show.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 14Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere from country to blues, classic hits to news.
APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
Get details at apsradio dot com.
Speaker 2Well I said earlier in the show, we're going to talk about Keystone cops, basically Keystone cash and trainees and furries.
While we're at that point right here, this is a zero Hedge article that is focusing on Discord the online platform and how it's going to be taken down.
That is not the issue.
This is yet another example of how people focus on Let's just say that you got a drone factory that is manufacturing drones and they're being used by country to fly into Russia or Ukraine or whatever, and they're flying in hundreds of drones all the time.
So what are you going to do you're just gonna sit there and you're gonna take shots at the drones, or you're gonna bomb the factory.
You gotta get to the root of the cause, or they're just going to keep manufacturing these things.
But they point out.
Speaker 4That interesting that they're going after discord.
I saw recently about how the Nepal Revolution thing that they had happening there, they actually elected their interim prime minister through a discord poll.
They literally had a vote on discord that was upheld and the interim prime minister was elected on discord.
Speaker 2So they went from total censorship of the Internet to having an election on discord.
Why not?
Look, my only.
Speaker 6Word brings unity interesting.
Speaker 2My only experience of discord was I had years ago.
It was probably about eight years ago.
I had some guys who are on Discord and they wanted me to beyond it was a free speech platform.
And it's when we're getting censored everywhere, and you know, the the messenger is not the issue, folks.
You know you're always talk about, you know, don't you know, don't shoot the messenger, Well, don't shoot the messaging system.
How about that?
Could we do that?
And yet this is what you see the conservatives pushing everywhere.
It's like, oh, this is used by the Butler, assassin and so forth.
Well probably Gmail was as well, So shoot Gmail.
Why don't you you know, it's not the message system.
The problem is how are people turning into people like this?
And that goes back to the schools.
So, but that's what this article is saying.
Well, it's all about Discord.
Subpoena Discord, investigate the founders.
They know what they're hiding.
Carousels are being groomed within their platform and they know it.
So this whole article is about coming after Discord.
Hey, zero Hedge, when are you going to run an article go about defunding schools?
Would you ever do that?
No, you'd never do that.
Speaker 4This is going a step beyond don't shoot the message.
This is don't go after the manufacturer of the paper that the messenger had.
Speaker 2That's right.
Is Discord being used to radicalize youth for violent acts?
Well maybe take a look at the school.
But that's what's being put out by Hunter.
Weiss was the one who tweeted that out and they thought that was worthy to feature in this idiotic zero Hedge article.
Here Discord blew up in twenty twenty as a safe space online community during lockdowns, and yeah it was.
It was one of the reasons why you're seeing stuff like this.
Look, if you're going to have a really free speech platform, guess what the Nazis and the fascist and the Furries and all these people are going to flock in there as well.
That'll always be the case if the speech is free.
Speaker 4Mean, while we can use the mainstream platform that's right.
Speaker 2Yeah, the communists and the nationalists are all fine using the mainstream platforms.
Stephen Crowder posted new images from the Utah Sheriff's Office internal documents, and this is why I would say, you know, this is one of the best arguments.
I would say, Altho, they're not proof of any conspiracy, but when you start seeing stuff being filtered through Stephen Crowder, I'd say be very careful about that as so called evidence.
Why is this guy getting a direct line from the Sheriff's office of all people, Stephen Crowder.
Seriously, he's an influencer, he's a nudger.
Why are they feeding him information translating the shooter's bullet casings.
This was a radical left Antifa adjacent Creek who liked the Minnesota shooter wrote political messages on his weapons.
Lingo is that of an entirely online left wing gamer?
Speaker 6Is that correct from what I've seen?
Yeah, basically it's all kind of just internet memes and things.
Speaker 2Something is they're going to come after gamers now when most of the gamers are pressed race but most of them are our right wing?
Are they left wing?
What'd you say?
Speaker 6Currently?
Even split a lot of them are right wing.
Speaker 4I would say legitimately that it's disproportionately right wing amongst game players, but disproportionally left wing amongst developers and the game press, which gives it a huge thing.
But yeah, I think that it is more right wing among players interrupt.
Speaker 2So it kind of is a mirror of society in general.
Right the people are are conservative, but the people who have taken over the institutions are liberal.
Speaker 6That's That's what leads to the yearly uh failure of many many games where they include all kinds of left wing nonsense and then they crash and burn in terms of sales, but they still make money because of Black Rock Bandguard State Street.
Speaker 2Then you know they'll keep funding that and they'll only fun that well cash Metel is coming in for a lot of criticism from conservatives.
They saw that he was eating at a very luxurious New York City restaurant during the manhunt.
I guess pausing to tweet false information.
Speaker 6Well, he to the old adage, you know, an FBI investigates on its stomach.
Speaker 2So that's right.
This is one of New York's most exclusive restaurants that he was at.
Rau Reo Rao is that Raul?
I think Reo Italian restaurant, And this is a restaurant that has a storied history.
It was a favorite I think of It's been there for a very long time, since the late eighteen hundreds.
It was a favorite of of many people in the FBI, also of gangsters, and also of actors who play gangsters, Robert de Niro, Al Pacino, these people have had long standing SEATS's very small restaurant and many times you don't get in unless you know the guy that runs the place, John Gotti, Lucky Luciano.
Frank Pellegrino owned the restaurant from nineteen ninety four until his death in twenty seventeen, known for his role on The Sopranos, where he played an FBI chief.
So of course I want the real FBI chief to come eat there at the diner, The Washington Post and even many people on the right.
So this highlighted Patel's inexperience and his lack of knowledge about how the bureau operates.
They claimed that morale and the bureau is low and that Patel is crumbling under pressure.
Well, he's got no way to win but himself.
Quite frankly, Cash Pattel's false start on Charlie Kirk killer draws scrutiny.
But Fox News says, but the FBI nabbed the suspect in the end, No, they didn't.
He was turned in by his father, by his roommate and others.
That's you know, they didn't have anybody.
They had the person turned in by the people who knew them, and that only happened.
All they had to do was to release the footage, and you know, they sat on the footage for a very long time.
He performed terribly in the last few days, said Christopher Rufo on social media, adding that he'd been talking with conservative leaders who are questioning the FBI's leadership structure.
Well, he was picked because he was an influencer.
He was picked because this is a Theatrical Administration, the Trump Administration deputy director Dan Bongino.
Yes, Pat, Dan Bongino.
You know, it's kind of interesting that Dan Bongino hasn't been seen for a while.
Speaker 6Ever since the Epstein thing.
We were just sitting there.
Speaker 2Yeah, and he criticized that and he left for a couple of days.
Trump doesn't want to get him out because he's a big influencer.
That's why he was put in as deputy director.
But what Trump did was he put in Andrew Bailey as co deputy director.
There's never been a co deputy director before.
This is unprecedented, but again we have precedent.
Trump who's saiding this.
I think he's just got the guy.
I think he's got Andrew Bailey there doing the stuff.
And if after enough time has gone by, he might just cut a Bongino loose, But he doesn't want to do it right now.
It looked bad if he got rid of Bongino after Bongino criticized Trump's cover up of the Epstein files.
But I think he's a dead man walking as far as his job goes there.
The the Kirk's killing put a spotlight on Patel's and Bongino's apparent fixation on social media.
Yeah, because they're influencers, they're nudgers.
One retired FBI agent who worked the bureau for two decades said Patel's premature post seemed reckless and too quick to the draw, But the retired agent also said he viewed it as a problem that went beyond Patel.
He said, it's becoming a popularity contest.
It's not necessarily something that's new either, because Jaigar Hoover was big about leveraging the press to make the FBI look good.
You know, he was the one who backed that program with Ephraim Zemblis junior the FBI.
I mean, he was notorious for that.
That tradition in the bureau has continued, but now it's sort of like that on steroids.
It's pretty amazing when you think of the self promotion being far worse than it was under Jigar Hoover.
How the FBI search for Charlie Kirk's killer went off the rails from reason, They said, the alleged shooter was turned in by his family and roommates.
Sorry, Fox got that wrong, while the surveillance state remained clueless.
Now that's a hopeful thing.
They're saying, with all the cameras and all the the surveillance that they have on all of us, they couldn't find this guy.
They had to wait be turned in by friends and family.
So there is some hope, I guess.
Speaker 6Rfully, they're all massively incompetent.
Speaker 2Yeah, without those tips.
Speaker 4Plot cameras are only good for spying on the civilians, not actually catching criminals.
Speaker 2Without the tips from the friends and family, it's hard to know how long the man would have gone on the night before.
Authorities had signaled that they were completely stumped.
As a matter of fact, I mentioned that to Karen.
They said, they made a statements said, well, we have pictures and video of the guy on the roof, but we're not going to release that unless we hit the wall with our investigation or something of that effect.
And then when they released it, I said, well, that's it.
They hit the wall.
They're desperate, helpless, we don't know what we're looking for.
Officials pleaded with the public for information based on a few grainy surveillance stills on Thursday night, and Utah's Public Safety Commissioner Bou Mason told NBC News authorities quote had no idea unquote where the shooter was.
Patel had caused major confusion by implying on social media that the FBI had caught the shooter, only to announce that the quote subject instead of suspect right, had been released after interrogation.
I thought that was unusual.
You know, we talked about we released the subject instead of the suspect.
This guy is not quite there.
Even on the lingo that man was completely innocent, but suffered a flood of threats after his name and photo were publicized, Adding to the confusion, Police also were filmed escorting a local elderly gadfly.
I guess that's the guy that had his pants his angle, that was screaming and you know, crazy stuff for me to looked like he was a co conspirator, didn't it.
Speaker 6There's a lot of crazy people on college campuses.
Speaker 2Yeah, they call him a gadfly.
I guess this is somebody who has shown up to rant at multiple events or something.
If they call him that, I don't know.
I have no information about that, so I'm just speculating here.
Speaker 4But the thing is, if he is saying arrest me, shoot me, I have the right to remain silent and all that right in the wake of a shooting in order to create a distraction for the actual shooter to get away.
He doesn't have to be part of the planning of it.
He's still clearly an accessory after the fact.
If nothing else, he needs to be arrested and prosecuted.
It's there's a clear video of him doing this, and cash Ptel needs to get on that.
Speaker 2Yeah, they're they let this guy go.
So I said, internet suits misidentified him near Utah.
At the time, I have no idea.
I'm not followed up on that guy.
At the very least, the manner of Robinson's arrest throws cold water on the idea that mass spying and heavy handed police powers are the solution to reducing crimes.
As reason and the right about that, and Rufo Christopher Rufo called for quote a campaign to disrupt domestic terror networks and to investigate, infiltrate, and disrupt the violent movements of whatever ideology threatens peace in the United States.
Again, this is a dangerous conservative reactionary response that was seeing from so many people.
Let's ramp up the police state.
I saw that from what was the guy's name, he was eventually fired from Fox News and started his own No No, not going back.
It was after the Charlie Hebdow shootings in Paris, and he was ranting and saying, everybody's complained about the police state.
I want a bigger police state to protect us from this kind of stuff.
I remember he came down for Wars once and Alex interviewed him.
Anyway, it's clear that they do not know the name of the suspect.
They don't have a cell phone track, they don't have fingerprints, DNA or digital footprints.
That journalist John Solomon, who was close to Patel, he said, and that's why they're putting up so much personally identifying information up there.
They're trying to get the public to find something that is out there.
So there again they have to rely on informants in the public because their surveillance state didn't deliver the criminal suspect.
Robinson seems to be like many other shooting suspects, a wolf who spent too much time on the Internet.
Again, we're gonna blame the internet, blame discord.
We're not going to blame the schools that are grooming kids into transgenderism and furries and the rest of this stuff.
And I got to say, when you look at this guy, he got this President's scholarship which was like thirty two thousand dollars for a couple of years, and I don't know how much you would still wind up owing.
I don't know where the tuition is there, but you'd still wind up with a fortune after four years if you only got thirty two thousand dollars.
But he had a very high GPF scene it reported as a straight A and I just got to say that if you are a straight A student in high school, it's because you pretty much believe everything the teachers tell you.
That was my personal experience.
When I was in high school, I really didn't care.
I really just kicked back and drifted through with mediocre grades.
It wasn't until I got into engineering that I started making straight a's because I cared about that.
I didn't care one what the teachers are telling me.
I knew it was a punch of nonsense and things that I didn't need to know, so I didn't apply myself to it.
But the people that I saw that were straight A students, boy, they were the you know, they lived and breathed whatever the teachers are telling them they took that as that's gospel truth.
An eccentric personality with no criminal record but with a straight a's in high school, who plays lots of video games, dislikes conservatives is a pretty broad profile one that covers potentially millions of people.
But it's the sexual gaslighting and things like that I think are really the issue.
And so Cash Betel comes out, this is I think not going to age well.
Either the truth will not be hidden, nor buried nor classified, says the guy who did all that stuff with the Epstein files.
Speaker 6Again, I mean you know that true stays buried.
Speaker 2Yeah, so journalist Benny Johnson, and I don't know if he's a journalist or if he's an influencer for the FBI.
He just spoke with top FBI officials who made it very clear they have not ruled out co conspirators in Charlie Kirk's assassination.
That assumption is premature.
This investigation is just beginning.
An enormous amount of evidence has been seized, both digital and physical, says Benny Johnson.
Speaker 1Desk.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right, got that file right on my desk and you'll all be seeing it really soon FBI sources assure me that the public will quote know everything unquote about the dark internet history chats and affiliations of Kirk's left wing political assassin.
That's why I say, you know, when we see some of this stuff coming out, we can evaluate whether or not it's true, or whether or not they seem to be playing us.
I think it's too soon to evaluate a of the stuff just yet.
We're going to need to have some more information.
We have everything we have focused on the radicalization moment.
So they're looking at the school.
I don't know, but they'll blame discord and the Internet and everything, but not the school.
We must know exactly who radicalized this degenerator.
I can't even imagine, can you.
Speaker 6That's a real mystery.
There's a rash of this going around, but no one can figure out where it's coming from.
Speaker 2It's like you got a mass stabbing and you've got some guy holding a bloody knife screaming all who like bar and they don't understand that you've done that motive or what he did this for.
In the weeks before Charlie Kirk's assassination, multiple cars with out of state plates were seen coming and going from the killer's downhouse, according to neighbors.
One neighbor said this did not give off a good vibe.
Conservative commentator Matt Walsh, we posted a message you broadcast two weeks ago.
We indicated now is precisely the moment in which trans militants are the most dangerous.
They've lost, the game is over.
They're now more desperate than ever, more full of hatred and anger than ever.
They're going down, but they'll take as many sane, normal people with them as they can.
It's going to get worse from here.
Be on guard.
Look, all this stuff is true, but again, not going to tell you to end public schooling.
And you should be careful.
You know, you should understand as Elon Musk said, when you're speaking this weekend to the people at the London protest, he told Charlie Robinson, and then.
Speaker 15You see how much violence there is on the left, with our friend Charlie Cook getting murdered in cold blood this week and people on the left celebrating it openly.
The left is the party of murder and celebrating murder.
I mean left.
Put that sink in for a minute.
That's who we're dealing with here, That is who we're dealing.
Speaker 2With yeah, but we're also dealing with schools.
If you remember, during the Clinton administration when it came to homosexuality, they said, well, let's go with don't ask, don't tell, don't make an issue out of it, and we won't make an issue out of it.
But now we've gone from don't ask, don't tell, to hey, don't tell your parents, but we're going to change your gender.
That's what's going on, and that's what's going on in all these Democrat states.
There's no question that we're clearly facing asymmetric civil warfare, said Jack p.
Soviet.
This is the guy who is fear mongering at the Canadian border.
Look, Jack p.
Soviet went directly from the intelligence services straight into being an influencer.
And remember he was walking around when Trump was saying we gotta have terraces against Canada because all this fentanyl is coming across the border.
And Jack pa Soviet goes up with a phone and says, look at this.
In a small town, you know, on the border, there's no fences, no guard stations, you know, no police dogs, all the rest of stuff.
Do you really want to have that at the Canadian US border?
I mean, it's pure fear mongering in order to support Trump's lies, because there isn't any lie that Trump tells that people like Jack, but Soviet and other influencers like that won't double down and tell you it's the truth, no matter how absurd, you know, like the Fentinel was all coming from Canada, that type of thing.
A man identified as nineteen year old Writer Corral.
That's an interesting name, Rider Corral sounds like a rodeo guy.
Yeah.
It does allegedly vanize the memorial for Kirk outside of Turning Point USA headquarters in Phoenix, Arizona.
The man who is just arrested for vandalizing Charlie Kirk's memorial at TUSA was wearing the same shirt as Kirk's assassin, and Nick Shorthor said the FBI should be tracking each and every person whoever bought this shirt.
Yeah, there we go, there we it's the shirt.
It's the shirt.
Speaker 6It's the immediately become violent.
Speaker 2Yeah, the abundance of the heart, the mouth that speaks, or the body wears the shirt.
Speaker 4I can play the video might see the shirt whispering to them like seeing Goblin mask too, And so.
Speaker 2Then Erica Kirk shared footage on social media showing her saying a final goodbye to her husband Charlie as he lies in his open coffin, which I thought was really kind of strange.
I mean, you know, since when have people done that?
You know?
Again, this is about influencing, you know, and marketing his death in a sense, seriously, Usually people want privacy about that type of thing instead of setting up photo ops and tweeting it out.
That's the thing that I find so creepy about all this influencer culture and why I have no use for people who identify themselves as influencers.
Toler Robinson lived with transgender partners, says The New York Post Singular singular.
The guy he was living with was in the process of transitioning, and he was These guys were into being furries as well.
A family member who asked not to be identified, said Lance Twiggs was the black sheep of their Saint George Utah family, but declined to speculate on a romantic relationship between the two men, but others said that it was romantic.
He grew up in a largely the shooter grew up in a largely conservative Mormon family.
Robinson was not registered with either major political party, and it appeared to become infatuated by the far left in recent years.
I wonder why, according to authorities, it's very clear to us and to the investigators that this was a person who was deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideologies.
Speaker 1I wonder where he got that idea.
Speaker 2Where did they deeply indoctrinate him.
It's the thing that must not be said.
Government school, that's where they deeply indoctrinate him.
A former co worker from Wild Electric told The Post Saturday that Robinson once posted about his marksmanship and having hit a four hundred and fifty yard shot.
So this kind of stuff was being put out by the left, saying, Welcky checks all the boxes of conservatives.
His family our Republican and blah blah blah and conservative, and you know, he plays with guns and so you know.
But now we're the ones being blamed with this.
Well, he flipped.
The question is how did he get flipped?
Who flipped him?
I think we know.
So they say he moved out when he was seventeen, so he got flipped in high school, not in college.
And then again, this article from the New York Post goes back to Discord again.
Discord said in a statement Friday, there was no evidence that he planned the incident or promoted violence on Discord.
The messages referenced in recent reporting do not appear to be Discord messages, they said.
These are communications between the suspect's roommate and a friend after the shooting, with the roommate was recounting the contents of a note the suspect had left elsewhere.
Again, if they had communicated on an email server, should that server be s down.
That's the argument that they're trying to use for Discord.
You know, maybe it's okay if you use Gmail, because Gmail probably scans and reports to the FBI any questionable words that they find there.
There was a thing like that in the nineteen early nineteen nineties.
I was with the Libertarians.
There was a program I think it was called Echelon, and people leaked it out and said, you know, they got echelon and they're scanning emails.
Because in those days, the Internet was simply text, right, it was.
You didn't really have the bandwidth to have any pictures or anything like that, or memes, and so it was all just text.
So the FBI started scanning, or the NSA or whoever it was, started scanning for words, and so several of us in the libertarian parties saw what the words were.
So we started passing the messages to each other using those words.
So let's get them busy.
That's right, let's create a lot of chaff for Charlie Kirk assassination suspect had a furry fixation, says The New York Post.
As well, he appeared to have a fixation for furries while his living transgender boyfriend espoused support for Joe Biden and joked about being mentally ill.
According to social media posts that were linked to the pair, Twiggs is transitioning from male to female, was in a relationship with the twenty two year old Robinson, and he said, I've been getting recommended treatments for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and a brain tumor recently by my social media advertisements.
This meme is perfect, thank you, And so again somebody's reading his male and figuring out this guy truly is lunatic, because it is being thinking that you're a furry or in the wrong body is truly an example of mental illness.
Schizophrenia, bipolar whatever you think want.
Speaker 6Yeah, the furry community used to be the sort of whipping boy of the internet.
To any time anyone was outed as a furry as immediately, you know, they were excoriated, they were kicked out, and people made fun of them.
It doesn't happen anymore, and society has gone in downhill since then.
We've got to bring that back.
You need to bully more furries.
Speaker 2Yeah.
His posts were rarely political, but they frequently referenced his gender transition, as well as being a former Christian.
In other words, he didn't like Christ.
He's Antichrist because the training stuff, folks, is a religion.
It is anti Christ, it is anti reality, it is anti sanity.
An account on the website for affinity dot net, which features sexualized images of cartoon animal character.
Oh but it's okay because it's just cartoons and costumes, right.
No, this is grooming people for bestiality.
I mean it is.
Speaker 6Yeah, they've been caught over and over again.
I'm not going to go into details.
Speaker 2You can No, you can figure it out for yourself.
Yeah, it's pretty clear, said one official and no listen of this says, it's pretty clear that Robinson's roommate knew a lot and didn't say anything after the killing, so they are a person of interest officially.
This is law enforcement using this guy's preferred pronoun of they.
This is the police playing the pronoun game.
That's why I'd say it is permeated society in all these different areas.
At least one group armed Queer's Salt Lake City wiped all of its social media in recent days, Although it isn't known whether this was a response to the ongoing investigations, I'm sure it had nothing to do with it.
So this family refuses to deny the transgender motive for the Charlie Kirk assassination.
We know exactly what is happening with it.
Deeply indoctrinated, says the Wall Street Journal with leftist ideology.
Again, where did that happen?
And who paid for it?
You and I pay for that kind of stuff at the government schools.
So this one guy put up he wants to be an influencer as well his furry roommate, and he said, I'm becoming a TikTok pro one terrible video at a time, and evidently he does have some really terrible videos.
He shared some videos showing him adding spaghetti to an Italian sandwich and microwaving a bottle of mountain dew.
There you go, he's ready to become an influencer.
Speaker 6High quality content, folks, that's right, high quality content.
Speaker 2So apartment residents said, these guys are loners and suspicious of me.
By one eleven year old who knocked on the door and said, hey, can I do some work for you?
Odd jobs or something like that, said the guy.
The shooter.
The alleged shooter kept glancing over his shoulder looking back in the apartment like he was worried something was going to be seen.
So who knows what's going on with this stuff?
Third roommate said that the third roommate was there but was mail and did not appear to be trans said a neighbor.
But guy moved out a year ago, and they said the same thing about this guy twigs.
I said, it didn't appear to be transgender.
I guess he wasn't engaging in dress up outside of the apartment or something.
But this is where they are.
And again they keep saying, well, he was radicalized, but they don't ever want to talk about how where he was radicalized.
And we all know this is the dog that did not bark, or maybe just say the furry that did not bark.
We've got some comments here.
Speaker 6Yes we do, if you're able to scroll those upplants stolen Tessa papers.
Who benefits from Kirk's death.
There's quite a few different people that benefit from Kurk.
Speaker 2Well, everybody is using it for their own benefit.
They're using the virtue signal, They're using it to get attention to do a lot of different motivations.
Speaker 1That are there.
Speaker 2Yeah, it's the problem.
Speaker 4There are too many motivations and even people that didn't have a motivation before are not going to let a crisis like this go to waste.
This will be used to push whatever agendas they.
Speaker 6Can stall says Lol.
Hassan owns a multimillion dollar house.
He's a fraud.
Also, Hassan's dad is a Turkish oligarch.
Hassan has never known struggling.
He's a complete Champagne socialist.
He completely He'll say things like eat the rich, and ironically, when he is the rich, he has well.
Speaker 2Of course, that's what we saw in Nepal.
One of the grievances that people had on the internet was the fact that they saw these Nepo babies of the Marxist leaders.
And again the ruling party was the Marxist Leninist Unified Party, So they take the two branches of communism and unify them, and their kids are posting up all these social media things showing the slavish lifestyle of them, as jet centers around Europe and everything.
Speaker 6It's the exact same sort of deal with Hassan.
Speaker 4Yeah, there's a famous picture Whereason, like someone said, it was all like designer clothes and standing in front of a luxury car and all that, and he's wearing a T shirt that says eat the rich.
And I think that's what you're referencing before.
It's like this kid who was born, you know, to these oligarch families, is going to be the face of socialism, of course, as it always is, because that's what profits the wealthy and rich the most.
Speaker 6That's how it always goes.
Oh yeah, a sunpikeer everyone, in case you didn't know who he was, now you do, and I apologize the real Octo Spook.
You never own your home.
The government is constantly lodging debt against it.
Yeah, as long as there is a property tax, you cannot own your own house.
You are just permanently renting it.
Defy Tyrant seventeen seventy six.
David Knight, can you please talk about the Brian Kilmead comments about involuntarily euthanizing mentally ill homeless people.
Speaker 2Why I'm not seeing that.
I'd usually if I say Brian kill Mead's name, I just kind of flipped past it.
Yeah, nothing of value here, that's crazy.
Yeah, I as a matter of fact, that's one of the ways that I'm typically a nighttime person.
I got into doing this morning show simply because I was going to be up against Brian Killed Me.
I thought he was absolutely the dumbest commentator on the radio at the time.
I had said, you know, I joked, it's like, I'll listened to him, it's just like Brian kill me.
But now he's actually talking about euthanizing people.
So I guess he should be known as Brian kill Me.
Speaker 6Just when you thought Brian kill me and couldn't get any dumber, he one ups himself.
Truly a testament to his art and Max.
They literally trained children not to listen to parents in Dare.
They taught them techniques on how to avert the domination of drug dealers, but in reality it was used to control the parents and ignore them.
Also says they got a DARE manual and they had many points whereby they trained the children's psychological tricks to dominate the parents disguised as how to avoid drug dealers.
Speaker 4Yeah.
Speaker 2M I was never a fan of DARE.
Speaker 6And we were home school, so we never had to deal with it.
MOE Studios is at MOE Studios.
I only drank when I was a teen because the government has laws against it.
Yeah, you can't tell me what to do.
Speaker 2I only took off my seat belt when the government put laws mandating the seat belts.
Yeah, I agree with.
I understand that Tyler Robinson used the username crafton twenty four to seven on payments on the app Vemo.
So these guys who are furries and trainees, they're allowed on Venmo, not me.
That's kind of the way that the corporate technocracy is going to operate, the corporate technocracy that Clay Higgins is bragging that he's going to lean into and that he has so much influence with.
And again we got people talking about how he was a loner in high school, he left his family when he was seventeen years old and so forth.
It was high school that radicalized him.
We would all say that it was colleges, and certainly colleges will do that.
As you guys talked about it, you got many friends you didn't get radicalized till they went to college because they were being homeschooled through high school.
But the earlier you do it, the easier it is to brainwash somebody.
Speaker 6Yeah, it's also important to realize that the schools, everything has accelerated.
The schools have gotten orders of magnitude worse than even just you know, when we were in high school.
I have friends that went to public schools and private schools, and they were, you know, they were a little bit more liberal than the people who I knew were home schooled.
But it wasn't this insanity that we see today.
They have gotten so much worse over the last ten to fifteen years that you know, before they used to really only start hammering you at the true Marxist commentary in college.
They have shuffled that down load.
Speaker 2Oh yeah, oh yeah.
Speaker 6And you know they're working their way back to elementary school, middle school.
They want it in kindergarten as soon as they can get the kids they want to start hitting them with Marxist ideology.
Speaker 2I went to the government school in the opposite direction because I had a good foundation at home.
My parents didn't leave it to the school to instill moral values in me, or political values for that matter.
And so when I heard the exact opposite, and it wasn't nearly the intensity as you point out right now that it is today.
But when I heard them speaking the exact opposite of what my parents had said, and it was like, I know that's not true, and so it pushed me really hard in the other direction.
Speaker 6I got to say, wait a minute, you guys are lying to.
Speaker 2Be What are they trying to do here?
I think I know.
Okay, We're going to take a quick break, Folcus, and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1You know, a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
You're listening to the David Knight Show.
Speaker 2Well, we were told that we are in a spiritual war, that we're not wrestling with flesh and blood, and that we don't use the weapons of this world.
Our weapons are mighty, and the world even thinks that it's kind of a compliment, and we look at it it's a when they start banning prayer everywhere.
As I mentioned at the beginning of the show, Australia now is banning praying for transgender people to reject gender ideology and to understand reality, and that frightens the Australian state and they push back against that in the same way that the UK does.
They don't want somebody standing praying silent.
She wasn't doing anything, she didn't have her hands up in the air.
It was nothing about her body language, and of course she wasn't saying anything.
She's just standing there.
And they said, you're praying, aren't you.
Well, I'm not going to lie to you.
Yes, I was praying.
Okay, you're under arrest.
And so the same thing's going to happen into in New South Wales.
Evidently New South Wales if you remembers where the COVID tyrant Gladys of beergic Lan Health Court.
And so now they've got the next step.
Here they've got and when I look at this, I think about it and I think, you know, they've got more faith in prayer than many professing Christians that I've met.
The law is being the law for being subjective and potentially leading to the persecution of individuals and organizations that adhere to Biblical principles on homosexuality and transgenderism, and Australia is now once again trying to return to its roots as a prison colony, says the comment from PJ Media, as the state of New South Wales reaffirmed that it is illegal to pray that transgender people will accept the sexes that God gave them, that they would come to their senses.
Formerly Christian Western democracies like Scotland and Australia are actually enacting laws against prayer.
Australia's New South Wales enacted a law earlier this year that the state's Attorney General, Michael Daily just affirmed does in fact man not only praying with, but praying for people to recover from the mental illness of gender dysphoria.
He also compared prayer to assault and trying to justify the government regulation.
Absolutely, it is an assault in the spiritual war.
They can't chain your prayers, folks.
What they going to do when they lock you up and you're praying in jail.
Speaker 6You get put in double jail.
Speaker 2You're in a double secret probation like that.
Emmal House.
You can pray with a person, he said, sorry, this is let's see, this is an Australian Christian outlet said.
You can pray with a person and do all sorts of things, said the Attorney General.
But if you pray in a way that it becomes a sustained practice directed to a person with a view of changing their sexual orientation or gender, that's against the law.
The question is how is this determined?
It is concerning enough that a person could be arrested for publicly praying with a gender dysphoric individual to accept the body that God gave him, Well, they need to accept Christ as Lord and Savior and then God will make it clear to them, amongst other things.
Speaker 6But anyway, so this, people can be gasoled into wanting to mutilate and change their bodies.
But you can't pray chage their mind, that's right.
Speaker 2You can't.
You can only talk to them in one direction, right, you can't go it's mandated that you talk them into insanity.
But if you're trying to talk them into sanity, that is prohibited.
Speaker 6There's a joke from Sam Hines twenty seventy Paradigm Shift where he says by twenty seventy state mandated homosexuality, and we get closer.
Speaker 2To that every single day.
Speaker 6We're we're so close the joke is kind of not funny anymore.
Speaker 2That's right, it's too close to real.
This would seem to be much more subjective and vague standard than that.
In other words, like if you had a group of people and you know, they got around a corporal clinger and they prayed for him to come to his senses that God would reveal that to them after they've been damaged, they would say, oh, okay, I can't have that.
Instead, this is very subjective.
Could New South Wal's authorities use this law as an excuse to arrest and persecute individuals, churches or organizations they are known to adhere to biblical principles on homosexuality and transgenderism.
Who is to say what constitutes a quote sustained practice unquote of praying about transgenderism.
Yeah, he talks about it being a sustained practice.
Really does look like he's going to target churches and organizations that talk about homosexuality asdomy and this insanity that's going out there and saying that's a sustained practice and I know that you people are praying for this kind of stuff that looks like that is exactly what is underneath this one person who is asking questions that with a follow up with respect, isn't prayer commonly about change of all sorts of things.
Most people, when they pray, are specifically submitting petitions to God for themselves and for other people.
Indeed, James five sixteen explicitly commands Christians to pray for one another.
Then the government official Daily pontificated said, well, if you're sitting down praying to someone to strengthen them and guide them and all those pastoral considerations, that's fine.
But if you're sitting down to pray the gay away, that is not.
As the PJ media says, Daily is a petty, tyrant and a fool, just like Clay Higgins.
Well, if it's unlawful prayer, he said, then it is not lawful prayer.
Speaker 6It was so simple.
Speaker 2It's whatever I say, it is right.
It's kind of like Richard Nixon saying, well, if the president does it, it's not illegal.
Speaker 4It's okay to pray for God to guide them, just don't guide them that way.
You can only pray that you guide them in the way that the state wants.
Speaker 2Don't guide them to reality, don't guide them to what is good for them.
Government can put limits on the behavior of its citizens, regardless of what that behavior is, and they do it in a myriad of ways every single day.
He said, whether it's prayer, or driving, or dallying in drugs, assaulting other people.
In other words, I can put any kind of limits on you that I wish.
And even though we have a Bill of rights here in the United States, our government still thinks the same way as well.
Daily is simply stating what leftists across the world believe, which is that prayer is dangerous, and they are right, it is very dangerous.
It's very dangerous to them.
What they're really recognizing is that prayer is powerful and it can stop people from falling for leftist lies.
That is why tyrants feirit even more than drugs or assault.
It is the spiritual weapon that can destroy the ideology.
And folks, I just mentioned this because when Clay Higgins and the idiots like him get their anti free speech stuff out there and start labeling and punishing people from what they perceive to be hate, this is what is going to look like it's going to be weaponized against Christians who support this insanity in the GOP Right now, it's going to be weaponized against us as Christians, There's no doubt about it.
Here's another example.
I've covered this many times.
This is a woman who was a former minister in Finland's government.
She was a former member of parliament there, and because somebody put on social media that the church that she attended was going to be having some kind of a pride event, she said, why are we doing this?
And she quoted a Bible scripture about that, And because of that, they have been coming after her again and again and again.
She's already won twice in lower courts, and the prosecutor keeps coming back.
He's relentless.
He's like the guy that was chasing the one arm in the Fugitive right.
Lieutenant Gerard is still after her.
So for the one tweet instead of the one armed killer there which labeled the charges baseless, included a Bible verse and a rare public gesture of support.
That was the US State Department saying that the US State Department, which is now saying that if they disagree with you, they're going to do these same kind of punishments, and the State Department will eventually disagree with Christians, just as it has under the Biden administration.
Finland's Supreme Court prepares to hear a case widely regarded as a test of whether expressing religious beliefs can be treated as a criminal act in a democratic nation.
Well, we know that it can and it will be.
I mean, just take a look at how the Biden administration weaponized the Face Act around abortion the clinics.
Was that really any different in nature than what was happening in the UK when they're arresting the woman who was praying silently.
We saw people attacked swat teamed because they were outside of the magic range that was declared in the Face Act.
And they are perfectly capable of all kinds of religious oppression here in the United States as well.
The case against the former Finnish MP accuses her of hate speech because she posted a Bible verse.
Two courts have unanimously found that the case is baseless.
But this person is relentless and keeps coming after her the prosecutors.
They've accused her of agitation against a minority group based on her twenty nineteen tweet quoting the Bible, and so they said, despite being acquitted unanimously by the two lower courts, now back in court to the continuing appeal from the Finnish prosecutors.
And this is for something that every civilization and religion knew was true until just a decade ago I started pushing this training stuff through the schools.
She is a medical doctor, a long time parliamentarian who served as Finland's Interior Minister first charge in twenty twenty one under the section of the Finnish Criminal Code that addresses war crimes and crimes against humanity.
And so where are people in the United States turning?
Well, they're turning to the app store, and they're turning to artificial intelligence as their religious counselors.
This article here from the New York Times is finding God in the app store.
Sorry, you won't find him there.
You might be able to get a Bible app that you can read or something like that, but these people are turning to AI programs to give them spiritual advice.
This is a kind of paganism and superstition that has a veneer of science and technology, but it's really nothing more than a ouiji bored religion.
It really is.
Millions of people are turning to chatbots to confess their darkest secrets and to seek guidance from on high.
Maybe the guidance from below is this actually gods I'm talking to, said one person.
These are chat bots and religious apps.
Tens of millions of people are confessing to spiritual chatbots their secrets.
Actually, what they're doing is they're confessing to government.
When they do anything you say, canon will be used against you.
They don't give you that disclaimer, and these chat bots that.
Speaker 6You can file it away somewhere.
Speaker 2They do not have the kind of privacy that you have in a confessional booth of the priest at all either.
So they're confessing their petty vanities, their deepest worries, their gluttonous urges, their darkest impulse.
Trained on religious texts, the bots are like on call priests and moms or rabbis, offering comfort and direction at any time.
On some platforms, even Purport two channel God Greeting's my child.
The future is in God's merciful hands.
Do you trust his divine plan?
And do you trust your chat bot?
Here the faith tech industry is becoming powered by chat bots and religious apps that are rocketing to the top of Apples app Store.
Bible Chat, which is a Christian app, has more than thirty million downloads.
Hallo, a Catholic app, beat Netflix, Instagram and TikTok for the number one spot in the store at one point last year.
And China, people are using deep Seek to try to decode their fortunes.
Speaker 6The cookies weren't doing a good enough shob.
Speaker 2The apps are attracting tens of millions of dollars in investment, and people are paying up to seventy dollars a year for subscriptions.
Speaker 4Deep seek and you will not find.
Speaker 2That's a good lance.
Several religious leaders said that they so far supported people you in the chatbots as long as they compliment but do not replace the work of the faith communities.
Yeah, don't take my job.
There is a whole generation of people who have never been to a church or synagogue, said Rabbi Romaine, a leader within Britain's Reform Jewish movement.
Spiritual apps are their way into faith.
No, they aren't.
As I said before, this is nothing more than a Ouiji bord religion.
They are generally affirming, They are generally yes men.
We say that all the time.
You know about AI.
It's not going to offer you accountability and it is not God.
Speaker 4This is AI delusion as a religion.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's right.
So yeah, this is the technocracy getting into religion and people are more than happy to worship it.
This is a tricky theological territory, said one person.
Because chatbots quote tell us what we want to hear.
It's not using spiritual discernment, it is using data and patterns.
Ms Collins said she'd found more support on the Bible chat app than she had at her church.
She said she faced judgment when she once shared her health struggles with her congregation.
People stopped talking to me, she said.
It was horrible.
Well, again, you know the problem with churches is that it's made up of people like you and me who have faults and people don't you know, people will abandon Christ because of the way that other people have acted, not thinking about the fact that they themselves are far from perfect and not a reflection of the Lord Jesus Christ either.
Speaker 4And so that's what we hear about these thoughts in every role is Oh, they're so accepting of absolutely everything I say.
They think I'm the best they agree with me all the time.
Yeah, surely having that as your God is going to be a great idea.
Speaker 2It all feeds narcissism, doesn't it.
And the Bible said two thousand years ago and the end, people will all become lovers of self, and they will attach themselves to technology that loves them even more than they love themselves.
So in Texas we have the Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is now going to be running for Senate, has been caught in shocking sex scandal as details of his secret adultery come out.
He's been caught in a shocking sex scandal less than two years after cheating on his wife with his mistress.
The Daily Mail can exclusively reveal that Ken Paxton was secretly seeing a married Christian influencer behind the backs of both of their partners.
See this is the other thing.
The woman that he was involved with was a influencer and she was influencing people giving them Christian counseling like this artificial intelligence, and had a family, had been married aid for several decades, just like Kim Paxton.
Kim Paxton had been impeached and was got into a lot of trouble because his first scandal involved somebody who he was accused of misusing his office and taking bribes while trying to get a job for her, and he denied these things, but it was part of the impeachment.
And his wife, who is I think a state senator.
I think she's in the Texas legislature.
She stood by him and did not leave him.
Then she found out, surprise, surprise, that this guy had some issues with character, just like Trump.
You know, when I was growing up, this would have been a deal breaker for conservatives.
The first one would have been a deal breaker.
But it's not.
People in Texas love Kim Paxton because he is joined at the hip with Donald Trump and apparently with other people as well.
But anyway, today the Conservatives and self professing Christians don't care about that.
They don't see an issue with character.
And look, folks, if somebody will do this to the person that they have promised love, honor, and cherish the rest of their life, what do you think they're going to do with the rule of law, with the constitution.
That's what I always said about Trump.
They will betray you if they will betray their spouse.
So he was impeached by the state house.
He used them, misusing his office and taking brimes to get a job for his lover.
And then this comes out to show that yes, it's going to continue.
The so called romance between Douhan and Paxton started after the pair met at the Kentucky Derby.
Speaker 6Oh well, you know, a little bit of infidelity to go with your gambling.
I suppose.
Speaker 2They've since had multiple rendezvous on trips across the country, even overseas, according to insiders.
At the time, they were both married.
On social media, she bragged about her twenty seven year marriage to the wealthy owner of thirty nine car dealerships.
Duhan keeps a very active social media presence, discussing the power of prayer, advising others on how to navigate death and other difficult times of their lives, and one friend of his explained it that, well, you know, Ken is not some kind of a sexual predator.
He is enamored with her face, he said, he's enamored with her faith.
How about that he likes, he likes.
He decided that he would have an adultress affair with her because she's such a strong Christian.
He likes that.
I love that in a woman.
I love that an adultery.
Speaker 6Don't you What do you even say about that?
It's just so ridiculous.
Speaker 2I know people will, We'll go to the to the bat for him, left and right.
Speaker 4Yes, sorry, I was only having a fit because I was so attracted to her loyalty and aful to her husband.
Speaker 2So yeah, she is a self described woman of faith, and she has led married retreats for couples, and now she's retreating from her own marriage.
I guess they finalized their divorce three weeks ago, and in an epic tweet, Ken Paxton's wife, Angela, announced the end of their thirty eight year marriage in July.
She said, today, after thirty eight years of marriage, I filed for divorce on biblical grounds.
In light of recent discoveries.
I do not believe that it honors God or is loving to myself, my children, or kin to remain in this marriage.
Paxton is a staunch ally of Trump, and that gives him the freedom to do whatever he wishes with the Republicans in Texas.
He's hitched his wagon to the MAGA movement and become one of the fiercest defenders of the president that he acts exactly like last year.
He decided to try and un seat Senator John Cornyan, who was another joke.
Both Paxton and Cornyn are appealing to conservatives who rank Christianity and family values at the top of their priorities.
Prior to the Paxton divorce, he was ahead by sixteen points.
Now Cornyan has drawn up even with him, so at least some of the people there get it that he can't be trusted.
But you know, Cornyn can't be trusted either.
He's shown that he can't be trusted to follow the law or the constitution.
Cornyan could not resist the opportunity to stick it to Paxton.
As news of a tech ceo who was caught cheating on his wife at the Coldplay concert went viral, he said, good news for Ken Paxton, sharing a parody tweet joking that the band would no longer be showing candid camera shots of their audience.
He also launched a new attack ad in July calling out Paxton for his affair with Laura Olson, who was the one that he got the job for and it was part of his impeachment.
Olson became a focus when the Attorney Journal was impeached by both Republicans and Democrats in the Texas House and allegations of corruption.
Long star members of the House alleged that Paxton used his position as the top law enforcer in the state to get bribes and donations just like Trump, that Paxton shills for.
On one top donor, Nate Paul, was singled out as paying for access to the Attorney General's office.
Paul pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of making false statements to a financial institution in exchange for other federal charges being dropped.
He was fined a million dollars and sentenced to five years supervised release.
And so Paxton beat the impeachment thing, and he is failing up, failing up into the Senate.
Evidently, Charlie Kirk's martyrdom is drawing people back to Christ, says one article here.
One person said, I'm going to church to Sunday and I'm telling the pastor that Charlie sent me.
As I said before, there are reasons to follow the word Jesus Christ and don't have anything to do with Charlie Kirk.
But look, if he tells people honestly his experience, and he did.
He witnessed quite a bit about his experience and was also explained to people why he believed there was a God, why the Bible was true, and so forth.
That is always a good thing and God can use that, you know, Paul said, when he was criticizing some of the people that were doing some things, he said, some of them are preaching Christ out of jealousy or trying to get gain out of it.
He goes, but I just rejoiced that Christ is preached because you know, God can use that.
None of us are perfect vessels, and so whatever we do, whatever the issues are in our lives, God can use that.
It does become something an obstacle when our lives are such an obvious contradiction and such obvious hypocrisy, as I are with some TV evangelists, but still God can use anyone and anything like that.
So I have no doubt that that is happening with people.
Do you have some comments you want to read?
Speaker 6Yeah, we've got star Barkley so as I watched Clint Eastwood's movie Richard Juwele last week, and the way he depicted the FBI was perfect.
Speaker 2Yeah, wasn't that excellent film?
I recommend that to everybody, everybody out to see that film.
That's really good.
It's an important it's important, and I think he got it exactly right.
Speaker 6I still haven't seen it, actually you haven't.
No, didn't get a chance to watch it.
N Max.
Trump wants internet censorship, calling for Bill Gates to do something.
He wants gun control.
The man is a fascist.
Only mouths the Magat agenda fed to him by Cambridge Analytica, not his agenda.
Speaker 2M I agree.
Speaker 6Trump is, as we've always said, a New York Democrat, and New York Democrats are socialists.
They are all in on all of these things, whether it's gun control, censorship, anything of that nature.
They want total authoritarian control of what you do, what you say, where you go.
That's why he is all in on freedom cities.
That's why instead of saying and looking at a fifteen minute city and saying, no, that is abhorrent.
That is everything we stand against, he went, what if I put a spin on it?
Yeah, what if I call it a freedom city?
Would you like it?
Then?
Speaker 2And you know, if he calls it a freedom city, just like with Patriot Act and Charlie kirkakt and I think it's going to be exactly the opposite.
It's going to be an enslavement city.
That's exactly what he's trying to create.
Well, we're going to take a break and when we come back, we're going to talk about World War three and what Trump is doing in Venezuela.
Speaker 6Old War three and you and me.
Speaker 2That's right, Yeah, mister Nobel Peace Prize.
That's there.
So we'll take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Speaker 1Folks analyzing the globalist Next and now the David Night Show, Decoding the mainstream Propaganda.
It's the David Knight Show.
Speaker 6Welcome back, folks.
We've got I R S.
Machine Gun.
That's it's a spooky name.
Thank you very much for the tip.
We really do appreciate it.
Says lunch is on me, gentlemen, have a great week.
Speaker 2Well, thank you very much, thank you.
Yeah, it's still the point where lunch id it's like fifty bucks.
Speaker 6Spend that much easily.
Thank thank you so much.
Iris machine Gun, Audi m R R.
Have people moved on from the Epstein cover up?
It seems like no one is talking about that anymore.
It's almost as if a series of distractions has occurred.
Speaker 2Yeah, it's funny, you know, they didn't even bring that up when they were talking about cash Patel's nonsense.
They didn't even bring up the Epstein stuff with that.
Yeah, that's kind of interesting, isn't it.
Well.
Speaker 6I think it's partially to do with just Yeah, American Americans have a very short attention span.
There's this continual news cycle and they're very used to the story changing every single day or multiple times a day.
Just keeping them focused on any one thing is very, very difficult, even when there's not things like the Charlie Kirk shooting happening.
Speaker 2Like up, you know, the talking dog squirrel.
Speaker 4There isn't really any breaking news in the Epstein thing.
It is something that we shouldn't forget about.
Speaker 2But yeah, where's the comedian I think of him?
Speaker 1The O.
J.
Speaker 2Simpson?
Speaker 6Oh?
Speaker 2Norm McDonald, Yeah, where's Norm McDonald?
Still no news on the Epstein documents.
I mean, I'm going playing right.
Speaker 6The worst part was the hypocrisy.
Speaker 2Yeah, operation Let's grab the oil.
This is from Chris Macintosh at International Man.
He says, so with all this stuff again, you know that Trump wants to move on, so he's going to focus on the easy prey, the US's own backyard Canada.
Remember the comments about Governor Trudeau and the political pressure on Mexico.
There's been the strong allegiance now with Argentina, the pressure being placed on Brazil, the focus on Panama, the canal being and all important, of course, and all this is due to a north south pivot, including all this as Venezuela and their black gold, he said.
Of course, it's all theatre.
It's a side show masking the real prize, the struggle over Venezuela's vast oil reserves, the largest proven reserves in the world.
Why, for example, is don not blabbing about Costa Rica or Honduras or any other country in the region.
Back in March of twenty twenty, the US Administration placed a fifteen million dollar bounty on Maduro's head through the DEA's Narcotics Rewards program.
They accused Maduro and other Venezuelan officials of narco terrorism and drug trafficking conspiracy charges.
This bounty, totaling over fifty five million, marked the first time the US had placed such a substantial price on a sitting head of state.
The US justified this action by claiming that Maduro's regime had transformed Venezuela into a criminal enterprise.
Well every Marxist government does that.
But this one, they said facilitated drug trafficking throughout the Western hemisphere.
Wait a minute, doesn't the CIA facilitate drug trafficking throughout the Western hemisphere the entire world as a matter of fact.
Should we have our government overthrown because the CIA created the crack cocaine epidemic so they could have their secret war?
Now, I guess not.
Speaker 6I've got a good comment here from George Boyce as Operation warp Oil.
Speaker 2Well, Don is really slick, isn't he.
Yeah, Venezuela's reserves, of course, as I mentioned last week, or bigger than even Saudi Arabia's.
Who needs Saudi Arabia can have a petro dollar just with Venezuela there.
And I think that's a big part of what's going on, especially when you look at what Trump said.
He's telling NATO, hey, you people are still buying Russian Well, I'm not going to help you to do the things that you want to do unless you stop Russian oil.
I wonder who they're going to get the oil from.
Maybe it would be the new standard oil of Trump Trump oil.
There you go, he is a snake oil salesman.
Why not sell the black crewed as well.
Despite this wealth, Venezuela's oil production has plummeted from over three million barrels per day in the nineteen nineties to barely eight hundred thousand barrels per day by twenty twenty, largely due to mismanagement, coruption, international sanctions, well mismanagement corruption of a centrally planned economy like Trump wants to make the US, so the question is can he get the oil out of the ground before his central control of the economy trash is America's ability to do that as well.
Trump Administration's sanctions effectively cut off Venezuela's access to US refineries, costing the country an estimated one hundred and sixteen billion between twenty seventeen and twenty twenty.
There's definitely no love lost there.
They're insulting each other in a social media war, but it's more than just personal animosity.
It reflects a broader geopolitical competition over energy resources in Latin America.
Venezuela's economic collapse has created a power vacuum that has drawn in actors from Russia, China, and Iran, all seeking to challenge US influence in the region.
And this is why it's important.
I mean, this is not like when Reagan invaded Grenada.
China already has a massive investment in extracting oil there in Venezuela.
And even if they didn't, as they said last week, if Trump moves down there, they're going to stand in solidarity with Venezuela against the US and it is going to be a big trip wire.
Both Russian and Chinese leaders continue their war of words.
The Venezuelan people remain caught in the middle, suffering from hyperinflation, shortages of basic goods, and humanitarian crises that are forced over seven million Venezuelans to flee.
This is all going to be escalated.
Some overpaid intern in DC just coined the name for the US military action against Venezuela, calling it Operation Democratic Stability.
This is not about stability.
This is about creating instability.
It's just like when they talk about having a stable coin and it's not a coin has not tied to anything.
That stable is tied to the US dollar.
Speaker 6What a cynical just slap in the face.
That is, every time they do something, as you point out, just the Patriot Act, a stable coin, Democratic stability.
Speaker 2As this person says, this isn't war, this is stagecraft with a budget.
Speaker 6It's a pageant.
Speaker 2Yeah, it's a pageant, that's right, and it's going to be a bigger trip where really than even the NATO stuff.
China Concord Resources Corporation has begun developing two Venezuela and oil fields, planning to invest more than a billion dollars in a project to produce sixty thousand barrels per day of kruduoil by the end of twenty twenty six.
The project marks a rare investment by a private Chinese firm in OPEC country.
Now again you can put private in air quotes, because there is no such thing really as a private Chinese firm.
The Chinese companist party will always have a seat at the table.
Trump wants to be like that.
He's put himself a seat at the table of Intel at their board.
Beijing has been an ally of Maduro and his predecessors and his predecessor, late Hugo Chavez, and it's currently buying more than ninety percent of Venezuela's total oil exports.
Chinese state oil giant CNPC was among the largest investors in Venezuela's oil sector before the US energy sanctions were first imposed on Venezuela in twenty nineteen.
China is also a big lender to Venezuela.
So the US is on the verge of invading a sovereign country for their oil to save democracy.
Imagine that he says, Actually, this would be a great test.
Ask yourself if the US would be invading a country that was littered with wind turbines or solar panels.
I don't think so.
And all this is while Trump is demanding that NATO not buy Russian oil.
Well, if you look at the different pieces here, he'll soon have a new resource for them.
He's engaged in a hostile takeover.
Trump made it clear on Sunday that he's backing off pulling the trigger on new sanctions against Russia and listed things that NATO members would have to do in order for that to happen.
This is the guy who, at the same time is pretending that he is the arbiter for peace.
It's like, here's what you guys need to do.
You need to get serious about going to war with Russia and so forth.
All of this nonsense about getting a nobel peace prize, folks, that is simply subliminal suggestions for his base, and he's implying that he really does want to have peace because he really wants that prize.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
All NATO countries must stop buying oil from Russia and in parallel agree to sweeping tariffs on China, said Trump.
He says, I'm ready to do major sanctions on Russia when all NATO nations have agreed and started to do the same thing, and when all NATO nations stop buying oil from Russia, he says, screams in uppercase.
As you know, NATO's commitment to win all uppercase has been far less than one hundred percent, and the purchase of Russian oil by some has been shocking.
Says the guy who is supposedly the peace negotiator.
He's cheering them on for war because sanctions and economic boycotts and all the rest of stuff and blocking energy that people need to get that is an act of war.
As Gerald Slinty pointed out many times, the taps of stuff that FDR was doing prior to the outbreak of World War Two.
China and India are of course at this moment the two biggest importers of Russian oil, But guess who is third NATO member Turkey and Turkey used to be the fourteenth largest buyer of Russian crude, but they started buying more in twenty twenty when Russia invaded Ukraine.
And I think part of it was because Russia was offering discounts and if you pay in gold or in the Russian currency.
So they went from fourteenth to now they are third.
Only China and India buy more oil.
And that's your NATO ally there for you.
But Trump is not about peace.
He doesn't want peace in Israel, in Gaza, he doesn't want peace in Ukraine, and he certainly doesn't want peace in Venezuela.
He wants land in Gaza, he wants oil in Venezuela, and he wants a piece of all those things, and he wants to be at peace because he wants you, folks, away from what he is doing.
Have a good day.
Thank you for joining us, the common man.
They created common Core and dumbed down our children.
They created common Past track and control us.
They're Commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future they see the common man as simple, unsophisticated ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us, while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that rout and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at the Davidnightshow dot com.
Thank you for listening, Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
D Davidnightshow dot com