
ยทS1 E7
Episode 7 - Aftershock
Episode Transcript
BBCGDAS.
Hey, Hi'm Maggie.
Just a quick heads up before we start.
The series does contain some descriptions of violence and deals with adult themes.
We're live at the Harris County Criminal Courthouse.
Speaker 2Channel twos.
Speaker 3Lee for Lishi is joining us live downtown with what we're learning from the courtroom as we wait for a verdict in this case.
Speaker 1Lee, So, the jury is expected to deliberate for only a few more minutes until about five point fifteen, then they'll be back at it again tomorrow morning.
It's a hot and humid afternoon in late August twenty seventeen, and the court reporters wait en mass for the climax to a story they've been following for years.
Speaker 4Jen, we are on verdict watch in the case against fifty seven year old Sandra Melgar.
The jury started deliberating yesterday evening, continued to deliberate this morning, and in fact, just moments ago, took a break.
This is a case.
Speaker 1After seven and a half hours split over two days, the jury reached a verdict in the State of Texas versus Sandra Jean Melgar.
As they file back into the courtroom, Liz scrutinizes their faces looking for clues.
Speaker 5When they all were called back after they reach their verdict, I already knew why because people were crying.
There were a few people who were crying.
To me, I was like, you're not going to cry if you're going to say someone's not guilty.
Speaker 1Sandy's attorney, Max Seacrest, is also studying each member of the jury.
Speaker 6Normally, if you're going to prevail, they'll look at you.
They may even grin.
Like this jury came in, not one of them looked us in the eye.
Speaker 1With everyone back in the courtroom, one of the jurors hands a slip of paper to the bailiff, who passes it to the judge.
They've reached a unanimous verdict.
The defend Sandra Jean Melgar, is ordered to stand.
She shakily moves to her feet, her body supported by her thin wooden cane.
The judge clears her throat and reads from the slip of paper.
We the jury find the defendant, Sandra Jean Melgar, guilty of murder as charged in the indictment.
Sandy lets out a cry of disbelief and falls back into her chair.
For Sandy's friends and family, it feels like the oxygen has been stripped from the room.
Speaker 6They were devastated, crying and it was just a horrible day.
Speaker 1There's Sandy's niece Marissa, who was there when she was found.
Speaker 7My heart just sunk into my stomach.
I could not believe this was happening to her because there was just no way, no way.
We knew, we knew that they got it wrong.
Speaker 1There's Tammy Armstrong, who consoled Sandy after her police interview.
Speaker 2We're in such shock and I mean dead silence when they read that verdict.
Speaker 1And there's Diana, the cousin who was more like a sister.
Speaker 8Sandy started crying immediately, Liz started crying.
We all started crying.
Liz ran to her to give her like one last time before they left, before they took her away, and then as soon as that happened, Liz fell to the ground.
Speaker 1For Liz, it's all a blur, like something out of a horrible nightmare.
Speaker 5It just felt like an out of body experience.
And I just remember, like my husband just like grabbed onto me really tightly, and it's like holding onto me and hugging me, and I kept telling her like it's gonna be okay, like we're going to figure it out.
I had no idea what I was doing, or like what I was even saying, or what that meant.
Speaker 1What do you remember how your mom took it?
Speaker 5I mean she was just in tears.
Speaker 2She was just.
Speaker 5I mean, it was devastating for everybody.
Speaker 1But it's not over yet.
It's down to the jury to decide how long Sandy will spend in prison, and there's a chance she'll never get out.
I'm Maggie Robinson Katz And from BBC Studios and iHeart Podcasts.
This is Hands Tied, episode seven, after Shock.
Speaker 2I think I had heard enough, felt enough that I truly believe that she did it.
Speaker 1You remember Aaron Day, he was on the jury.
Speaker 2The didn't had the ability to do it, even though she doesn't remember doing it.
I think that was a convenient defense.
Oh I forgot or I don't remember.
Speaker 1One of the first things they did when they entered the jury room was take a quick count.
They'd heard the prosecution, they heard the defense.
Who did they believe.
Five of the jurors thought Sandy was guilty, four innocent, and three were undecided.
Speaker 2I was on the guilty side.
From the moment we sat down, we talked about it.
We were each given time to discuss our feelings and our position.
There was a lot of I don't know, I need to think through.
There was so much information and there were some people going, yes, she did it.
She was say no, she didn't.
Speaker 1And then how did you come to reach the unanimous verdict?
Speaker 2We looked at a lot of the evidence again, we looked at a lot of the discussion, We read transcripts, we went over testimony, how we felt about the testimony.
Speaker 1Together, the jurors workshopped Sandy's future.
Speaker 2What evidence could prove that she is innocent of the crime.
There was hardly nothing there.
That's why we kept going to the guilty.
She was there and she had the time and ability to do it, and the ones that were unsure listened to us, they changed their mind and they deemed her guilty.
And so then we had to say, well, we'll have to tell the world how we feel.
Speaker 1So what does Aaron think happened that night?
Speaker 2Witnesses painted them as a happy couple to the public, but I don't think she was ever really happy because all the attention that was paid to her husband.
He was an elder within the church, and being a Latin American.
He was very charismatic.
I think the murder was an accident.
I don't think she purposely tried to murder him, but I think that anger, after years of feeling that way and not discussing it, came out in this alcohol and drug filled rage, and it went too far and she killed it.
Speaker 1Honestly, I'm surprised to hear Aaron say this, because when I wrote the court documents, I'm not sure the evidence supports that theory.
Sure, Sandy did drink that night.
She said she had a pina colada with her meal and two Vodkas in sprite in the jacuzzi, but also told detectives that she didn't finish the second one.
But drugs, she was all like.
Speaker 2A myriad of like two.
I think we're are two very mental drugs for her.
Lupus are very powerful drugs.
And then she had the migraine medicine, which in my mind would be one that you don't drink alcohol with.
But that night they had been out drinking.
Speaker 1Did they go through the various medications that she was on in the side effect that they could have.
Speaker 8No.
Speaker 2I don't think the defense or prosecution brought any of that up.
They just mentioned that she was on drugs.
Speaker 1But what about what was said in court?
If this is a case about stories, it seems the prosecutions made more sense to Aarin.
Sandy was unhappy, she needed to get out of her marriage, and therefore resorted to murder, while the defense's argument of a home invasion gone wrong just didn't add up.
Speaker 2They failed to tell me or make me believe she didn't do it.
So I'm like, oh, you're not offering me any Oh, yeah, there was somebody that came in the house, Well prove it.
Where's your proof?
Do you have any video that shows somebody going to the house, any footprints, any fingerprints, any evidence that somebody was there?
Did the body have anything on it?
The prosecution and the investigators found.
Speaker 1Nothing to Max Seacrest, Sandy's defense attorney.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of the justice system.
Innocent until proven guilty.
The burden of prooflies with the prosecution.
It's for them to prove someone is guilty, not the defense to prove their innocence.
Speaker 6I don't want to ditch a jury.
I respect their verdict here, but I obviously don't agree with it.
I can't fathom how a group of folks conscientiously could believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the prosecution had proved its case.
Speaker 3I mean, this is an absolute tragedy.
Speaker 1Alison Seacrest, Max niece and fellow attorney.
Speaker 3She lost the love of her life, her best friend, her caretaker.
I mean, Jim took care of her, He drove her around.
There were times where she couldn't even drive because of her seizure disorder and the impact that this had on her daughter and not being able to see her grandchildren grow up.
I mean, it's just really wrong.
Speaker 1What went wrong in the trial?
Then?
Speaker 6You know that's Uh, that's only a question that Alison and I ask ourselves every day.
I rarely have a day that I don't think about Sandy.
Uh.
And it's it's hard, it's hard to answer.
Speaker 1Max's voice catches.
He takes a moment to compose himself.
It's clear the whole trial has taken a toll on him, and he's still trying to make sense of how it all played out.
The impact of the choices he made.
Walk me through the decision to not bring Sandy on the stand to give evidence.
Speaker 6Well, that is an area that I really can't discuss because of attorney client privilege, but I will say this, it was our belief before we tried the case.
It's our belief now that obviously she had no burden.
So that was a decision made by us, by the lawyers.
Speaker 5I said, maybe you should testify, and she said, I'll have a seizure on the stand.
I can't because she gets when she's stressed, you know, or too tired, doesn't get enough sleep, you know, she will have a seizure.
I said, no, just have a seizure, Just let them see it.
Like they don't believe you, Just stop picking your medicine and have a seizure.
She's like, no, I don't want to prolong this any longer.
Speaker 2I often wonder how I would have felt that she did take the stand and said I didn't do it, look at the jury and say I didn't do it.
Was that assuade me?
It might have.
I mean, I can't tell because she didn't choose to tell me directly.
She did not murder her husband.
Speaker 1And though hindsight is always easier in the rear view mirror, Sandy and her defense team have to look to the future embrace for the jury sentencing.
It's the day after Sandy was found guilty.
We're back in the courtroom and it's time for sentencing.
Her attorney, Maxycres, asks for leniency.
He describes Sandy as a good, caring, loving wife with no criminal history and innocent of the crime she's been convicted of.
Speaker 9And that's exactly why we're here today, because they drank the kool aid of Sandra Melgar.
Speaker 1Prosecutor Colleen Barnett, her word, spoken by an actor, requests an appropriate sentence for someone she believes as a calculating killer.
Speaker 9She's even manipulated her lawyers.
She's manipulated her church group, She's manipulated most of the people that she goes around with who believe that she is in.
Speaker 2When they made us decide how many years in prison she had to spend, there was a lot of controversy there, being in her age and being her physical illnesses.
Some people wanted to give her the minimum time, some people wanted to give her the maximum time.
Speaker 1There is a minimum of five years in prison, with the maximum sentence being life.
But Sandy is fifty seven years old, so there's a very real chance she could die in prison.
Speaker 2So we ended up somewhere in the middle.
Speaker 1Sandy melgar Is sentenced to twenty seven years behind bars.
How did that feel hearing the sentencing of twenty seven years?
Speaker 5They felt that twenty seven years was showing her mercy because with good behavior, you can get out in half the time, So that would be like thirteen and a half years, and so they felt that she would be like seventy something and she could still have some time with her grandchildren before she died, and that that was their bit of mercy for her.
Speaker 1To Liz, if Sandy was guilty, mercy would be the last thing on her mind if she's guilty.
Speaker 5If she was guilty, why would I want to spend time with her?
Why would I want her in my house?
Why would I want her around me or my kids?
I wouldn't.
There's no way in hell.
Speaker 1Was there any hope you had during the trial process that she wouldn't be convicted?
Speaker 8Yeah?
Speaker 5I mean I thought it was really open and shit case.
I thought that they would present the evidence and they would people would see what it was and they would let her go.
You know, we thought we were all going to go home after that.
Speaker 1Liz leaves the courtroom without her mom while Sandy is taken to her cell.
Speaker 5And then you know, having to go home and explain to my daughter because she's like running down the stairs and she's like, where's Nana.
I was like, oh my god, I can't.
Speaker 1Nearly five years after Jim's death, Sandy begins her sentence.
She's taken to the William P.
Hobby Unit, a women's prison between Houston and Dallas.
Speaker 5It was known as Hobby Hell.
I've never heard her more terrified.
Speaker 1Sandy's cousin Diana ficit's as often as she can.
Speaker 8Hobby was an extremely scary place.
Sandy got threatened, she got verbally abused, Like even my sister and I when we would go visit.
It was a scary place just to go into.
The guards were, I don't know, very hard and cold.
Speaker 1She's eventually moved to a women's medical facility.
Speaker 8Carol s Young, I feel better that she's at a medical unit.
We there's still a lot of crazy stories that Sandy tells us.
You know, there's still drama happening, there's still fights, but I no longer feel that her life is in danger, Whereas in Hobby I thought we could get a phone call eighty day say, Sandy's gone because somebody got in a fight.
She was in the wrong place, wrong time.
Speaker 1Sandy may be in a better place, but prison is still prison.
Speaker 5All I can think about is my mom laying on this like hard prison bed, and she's alone and suffering in prison.
And I get to I get to travel, and I get to be with my kids, and I get to do as I please.
It just seems wolly unfair.
Speaker 1Sandy is still at the medical facility today.
I really wanted to interview her in person or even just by phone, but my request was denied by the authorities.
So I write to her.
I introduced myself and ask her if she'd be okay answering some questions over prison email.
A couple weeks later, I get a response.
She tells me about the weather, writing, we actually had some snow last week.
That's unheard of in Texas, especially so close to the Gulf.
We only got about eight inches, but that's a lot here.
Lol.
Sandy's warm in her messages, almost light as well as the occasional lol.
There's an old school emoji, you know, the one colon in a parenthesis making a smiley face.
In one email, I tell her I went to go visit Liz in London, but don't hear back for a couple of weeks.
So I send another and then another, and then I finally hear back from her.
She tells me she's been called into the supervisor's office to discuss our messages.
She writes, they question me about the podcast.
I told them that I had already informed you that it wasn't allowed, and I told them to look at my replies to you.
They already had, but they still wanted to question me.
Speaker 2Ha.
Speaker 1She goes on to detail her day to day life in prison and how difficult it is.
Breakfast is at four am, so I don't go because I can't sleep.
But three or four hours at night, it's very noisy and things are going on at all hours.
You can hear the inmates talking or arguing in the middle of the night, or the banging of the bathroom doors, or the officer yelling for one of the inmates to get up for one reason or another.
I'm not in a cell.
We are in cubicles, so it's all open to noise and nosy people looking in to see what you have or what you are doing.
Zero privacy.
In another message, she tells me about her memories of Jim, responding to a question I had asked weeks before.
I have many great memories of Jim, from the time we first met in high school.
His sense of humor, his corny jokes, which we call Jim jokes.
He was a person always willing to help in whatever way he could.
He could do just about anything, and if he didn't know how, he would learn.
Except for cook, he couldn't cook at all.
I miss him terribly and dream of him often.
We had been married thirty two years, and I know we would still be together if this terrible ordeal had not happened.
It's an awful nightmare that I haven't woken up from.
All I can do is continue to pray and remain hopeful.
I reach out again.
I have to ask her if she killed Jim and what she thinks happened.
I know it's my job, but after this message, I kind of can't help but feel like an asshole.
If she didn't do it like she claims, this is just putting salt on the wound that she's in prison for a murder she didn't commit, and if she did, well, I guess I shouldn't feel bad about asking her if she did.
Sandy eventually writes back no, she writes in capitals, then goes on to repeat some of what she already told me that she and Jim had a great relationship, adding that they had plans to travel, go see the Northern Lights, visit Ireland, see Machu Picchu in Peru.
In many ways, me writing to Sandy isn't your typical interview.
In fact, it really isn't an interview at all.
I have so many questions about what happened that night in December and how her version differs from what we heard in the trial.
But there's no real back and forth.
But you know, in the end, it actually really doesn't matter what I think.
It's up to the legal system, and right now Sandy's defense team are refusing to give up.
Speaker 6We contended that, you know, the verdict was based on conjecture and speculation, not evidence sufficient to establish her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Speaker 1After the shock of losing the trial, Sandy's attorneys Mac and Allison ccrest regroup and decide to fight on.
They're determined to write what they see as a miscarriage of justice and get Sandy's verdict overturned.
Speaker 6We're personally wrapped up in it, and we take it personally.
We know Sandy, we believe in Sandy, and we take it personally because we're in the middle of it.
We're part of the process, and so we've never you know.
Speaker 1Shirked that they call for a retrial, but the request is denied.
A panel of three judges uphold Sandy's conviction, ruling that there was enough evidence to convict her.
But Mac fights on and takes the case to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Speaker 5Oh yay, oh yay, oh yay.
Speaker 7The Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals is now in session.
Speaker 8We're ready to hear an argument.
Speaker 1Almost four years after Sandy's conviction, Mac seacrest is back in court.
Well sort of.
Speaker 10Good morning to the court.
I'm George McCall, say christ junior.
Speaker 1It's twenty twenty one.
You know, you remember the pandemic and because of it, Mac is presenting his arguments to a panel of nine senior judges.
Speaker 10Over zoom, I don't believe the evidence that you have shows that the state proved that Sandy Milgar killed her husband.
The state proved that she was present.
Speaker 1Each of the nine judges appear in their own box on the screen, MAC in another, and then there's a digital timer in a box all of its own.
MAC has twenty minutes for his arguments.
A red light will warn him when his time is up.
Speaker 10He was viciously assaulted, he was beaten, consistent with being hit with a fist, consistent with being kicked.
It's just not plausible under the circumstances that she could have caused that type of injury.
Speaker 1As the timer ticks down, he tells what's now a familiar story.
Matt goes through the prosecution's case, arguing it was built on conjecture, not fact.
Speaker 10It doesn't even approach that which can safely say comports with the rudimentary requirements a due process of law.
Speaker 1The timer light turns red and alarm buzzes, signifying his time is up.
Speaker 2Thank you, counseled.
The court will stand in recess until ten o'clock.
Speaker 1He signs off zoom and waits.
Speaker 6They sat on it, and sat on it, and then ultimately they dismissed the case.
Speaker 1That was in June twenty twenty two.
So in Layman's terms, what does that mean?
Speaker 6That means we lost on appeal and ultimately the court did not reduce Sandy's case, so her conviction is affirmed.
What it means is as far as her quote unquote direct appeal is concerned, it's exhausted.
Speaker 1I asked Liz how her mom felt about the judge's decision.
Speaker 5She really got her hopes up, and I kept telling her, like, you know, ninety percent of the time, this is going to get to and I don't want you to like fall into despair if that happens.
And of course that happened, and she just it really hit her, you know, she sent her to severe depression.
Speaker 1This really hits Liz too.
She feels like she's lost both of her parents, and now the legal process is all over.
She no longer has the case to distract her from her feelings of grief.
Speaker 5Like I had basically obsessed over the case file, Like when I reached the end, I would just start all over and see what I'd missed, or I would blow up all the photos on my computer and look inch by inch, like all over to see if there were any clues, missed, any evidence.
I don't know if that was like shock or just knowing that these things had to be done and I didn't have time to break down.
Speaker 1Liz finds SLF at rock bottom.
Speaker 5Once everything got handed over and there was nothing left to do, that's when it got difficult.
And that's I think when I realized I had really bad PTSD.
I don't even feel human anymore.
I miss the person that I used to be.
Speaker 1Yeah, if it's okay to talk about, Like, what are some of the things, like you remember about how you used to be contrasting with how you are now?
Speaker 8I am.
I was very social.
Speaker 5I could talk my way in or out of any situation.
Speaker 1I could still see that now, to be honest, Like, I can totally see that now.
Speaker 5But like now I just hate being around big.
Speaker 3Groups of people.
Speaker 5I don't trust anyone.
I just feel like I'm not fun anymore.
I don't know.
Speaker 1It's almost like I've died.
Do you ever allow yourself to feel hope?
Speaker 5No?
Speaker 8No.
Speaker 1The ricochet effect of any crime can create fallout, impacting the lives of not just those who were directly involved, but they're family and friends.
It's not only Liz who has been impacted, it's all of Sandy and Jim's friends and relatives, including her cousin Diana.
Speaker 8Anytime I see a cop car behind me, like I have a bodily reaction, like I start sweating, I start I just I have that fear.
And even same thing with Houston, like I used to love Houston because Sandy and Jim were there.
I loved it, And now I see the downtown skyline and it turns my stomach because I have the memories of the trial.
I was one of those people that I would hear people say, you know that people in jail claim they didn't do it right, Like I'm innocent.
I'm innocent, And I've always thought like, yeah, right, like you're in jail for a reason.
I didn't believe it until this happened to Sandy.
Speaker 1And Melissa's cousin Marissa, who was there the day Jim was found.
To this day, Uncle Jim is still a central part of her life.
Speaker 7I have his ashes actually on a counter in my restroom, and so I whenever I need some advice, live advice, because that's what my uncle was really good at, just life in general.
Whenever I'm feeling down, whenever anything really happy news, I just go to his ashes and I start talking to the box.
And I know that might sound weird to some people, but it just makes me feel like he's with us, and he is.
Speaker 1I know he's with us.
What's that expression?
The darkest hour is just before the dawn.
Well, Max Seacrest hasn't quite given up.
He picks up the phone and makes one last call, one last throw of the dice, one last attempt to help Sandy.
But it's a slim chance.
The man he's calling might not be able to help them.
Dang, he might not even pick up the phone.
Speaker 11I did not know him, so it was kind of a cold call.
Speaker 1The person mac rings is Mike Ware, a criminal defense lawyer.
Speaker 11He talked about how much this case meant to him and how there was no doubt in his mind that Sandy was completely innocent.
Speaker 1Mike founded an organization in Texas which has got forty people exonerated since two thousand and six.
Speaker 11He knew of us in our work and wanted us to take on the case.
Speaker 1Mike Ware helps people who are all out of options, but he only takes on a fraction of the cases that come to him.
Will he take on Sandy's.
Speaker 11We have to, through whatever means, be convinced absolutely that they are in fact, absolutely innocent, And by that I mean that either the crime they were convicted of occurred pretty much as the police, the witnesses, the prosecution says it happened.
It's just they are not the ones who committed it.
It was someone else, or in some cases, no crime at all was committed by anyone.
Speaker 1That's next time on hands Tide.
You've been listening to Hands Tide from BBC Studios and iHeart Podcasts.
New episodes will be released weekly, so subscribe or follow on the Heart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts so you don't miss out.
If you like the show, please help us by spreading the word or giving us a five star review.
I'm Maggie Robinson Katz and the producer is Maggie Latham.
Sound design and mix is by Tom Brignell.
Our script consultant is Emma Weatherall production support is from Dan Martini, Elena Boutang and Mabel Finnegan Wright, and our production executive is Laura Jordan Raul.
The series was developed by Anya Saunders and Emma Shaw at iHeart.
The managing Executive producer is Christina Everett, and for BBC Studios, the executive producer is Joe Kent.
James Cook is the Creative Director a Factual for BBC Studios Audio and the Director of Audio at BBC Studios is Richard Knight.