Episode Transcript
You are now listening to the Someone's Favorite Productions podcast network.
Speaker 2Welcome back to Tumbleweeds and TV Cowboys, a classic Western film and TV podcast.
My name is Hunter.
In this week's episode, Will Dotson is back, and this time we're talking about a John Wayne movie called Allegheny Uprising.
This is set in pre revolutionary America, so it's before any significant westward expansion, and it takes place in Pennsylvania.
So is it a Western or historical drama?
We're calling it a colonial Western.
No matter what you call it.
It's a fun movie to talk about, and we're going to get right into it.
Here's our conversation on Alleghany Uprising.
Welcome back, Will.
How's it going?
Speaker 3Oh?
Pretty well, pretty well, glad to be here.
How how you been doing.
Speaker 2I've been doing well.
It's it's it's been a couple months since you were on talking about Stagecoach and this timmer around.
We have a very different John Wayne movie on just about it.
But before we get into it, let's talk about what you've been up to.
Do you have any Blu Ray feature or podcast appearances or anything else you'd like to mention?
Speaker 3Sure?
Yeah, let's see most recently my colleague Ryan Verrel and I produced a visual essay for Deaf Crocodile's release of the first Lithuanian rock opera, The Devil's Bride.
It's a fantastic and beautiful movie, and I think the essay is pretty good too.
It's definitely worth checking out.
Speaker 2Yeah, I've seen the art for The Devil's Bride and it looks amazing.
Speaker 3Yeah, it really is quite good.
On the other end of the artistic spectrum, Several just released the nineteen ninety Australian medical thriller Dead Silence with Linda Blair, and for that one, I actually got to just be the window dressing.
I narrated a visual essay that was written by the film critic and writer Bud Wilkins.
It's about kind of the genre of the medical thriller, so I think it puts the movie in context.
Pretty happy with that.
Speaker 2Oh that's awesome.
But yeah, but we've got to get into this movie.
Will what a picture.
I'll talk a bit about the cast and crew and then we'll kind of get into our general thoughts.
Speaker 3Okay, And I want to thank you again because I threatened with I threatened you with this film.
Soon after we first began talking, Yes, and I commend you for following through.
Speaker 2Yeah, And you know, I was very unsure about covering it, and I think I even said it takes place.
I told you it takes place in Pennsylvania.
I don't know if it can be considered a Western.
And then you mentioned the idea of it being a colonial Western.
Speaker 3Yeah.
Yeah, in the sense that it is the features of the genre right there there.
Yeah, the settlers are pushing west, but this is pre Revolutionary War.
It's close to the Revolutionary War, but it's it's got all the elements of a traditional Western.
Speaker 2Yeah.
I am happy you pushed for it, though, because I do think it is going to be a fun movie to to talk about.
Now was It was directed by William A.
Cedar, and I've seen a few of his movies and they're mostly comedies.
I know he directed Sons of the Desert, which is a Laurel Hardy movie, and he did a Marx Brothers movie called Room Service.
And I actually watched a couple of his movies, probably in the last year.
I watched You Were Never Lovelier.
But it's a musical with Fredistare and Rita Hayworth and He also directed a pre code movie called Big Business Girl, starring Loretta Young, and I love pre Code era Loretta Young, and I think in Joan Blondell is also in that movie.
But are you familiar with any of cedars will.
Speaker 3Just the Room Service.
I don't think I've seen any of those that you've that you've mentioned.
Speaker 2Actually, yeah, if you look at his filmography, the majority of them are definitely comedies.
And I think I look to see if he had any other Westerns, and I think this might be it, but I'm I'm not positive.
And then for the cast, Claire Trevor he received top billing and and John Wayne is second billing.
But I mean, he's clearly the star of the movie.
And it also star as George Sanders, who I know you'll be quoting later and I might as well, and Brian Dunlevy, and I've always been a fan of him.
I really like the great McGuinty, the Preston Sturgis movie, and I love The Glass Key as an Alan Ladd Veronica Lake Noir.
I think that's a great movie.
And he was in quite a few westerns.
He was Industry Rides Again, Kenyon Passage, and Cowboy and quite a few others.
And then another recognizable actor in this is Chill Wills, which a tremendous name.
But he was in the Westerner, and he was in a couple other John Wayne movies.
He was in McClintock and Rio Grand And the script was written by PJ.
Wolfson, and he adapted the novel called The First Rebel by Neil H.
Swanson and Wolfin's at Wolfson's.
He's written and co written some pretty good movies.
He wrote Dancing Lady, which is like an MGM musical.
It's kind of a Buzby Berkeley knockoff with Joan Crawford and Clark Gable.
That's really fun.
And he co wrote Mad Love, the Carl Freud movie with Peter Lourie.
Speaker 3Oh yeah, okay, yeah.
Speaker 2And he also co wrote or maybe wrote the whole script for A Vivacious Lady, the George Stevens movie.
And it was shot by Nicholas mussaraka the DP who shot out of the Past in the Spiral Staircase.
So there is some pretty strong talent in front of and behind the camera on this movie.
Yeah, now, will now, do you want to say what this movie is about or would you rather I read a synopsis?
As you know, I can't do plot summaries.
Speaker 3Well I can I go ahead and give the synopsis, and then maybe I can give a little bit of background on the historical events that the novel was based on, just to put the movie into context.
Speaker 2Okay, yeah, that sounds good.
All right.
So in seventeen fifty nine, in Pennsylvania's Allegheny Valley, local settlers and Indian fighters try to persuade the British authorities to ban the trading of alcohol and arms with the marauding Indians.
That is the IMDb plot summary.
Speaker 3Oh, that's it, that's it.
Speaker 2Yeah, very brief, I AMDB.
If I go with the letterbox synopsis, it's very long, IMDb.
They like whatever their character limit is, it's much lower than letterbox.
Speaker 3Well that's great.
Well yeah, that's pretty much it.
Yeah.
So this is the novel was based on what's called the Black Boys Rebellion, and this was some of the fallout after the what's known as the Seven Years War, the French and Indian War seventeen fifty four to seventeen sixty three.
The British were victorious.
They acquired all these territories in North America, parts of the sort of Northwest Frontier of the time, going all the way up into Canada, and the British government issued some people might remember from high school history, the Royal Proclamation of seventeen sixty three, right, and that forbade settlers from moving west beyond the Appalachian Mountains.
That was a treaty that's supposed to preserve the indigenous territory.
Well, don't need to tell you what the settlers did.
They pushed right on through and then got mad when the indigenous people began to resist, most famously Pontiac's rebellion in seventeen sixty three and seventeen sixty four.
So I sound like I know what I'm talking about.
I did actually get some notes together, so you can call this ironic if you want to.
But settlers in western Pennsylvania and Virginia, despite you know, doing what they weren't supposed to and pushing, pushing the western frontier, felt like they weren't getting enough support from the crown right in the form of soldiers protecting them from the natives in terms of trade and so on.
And they some began to feel that the fact that the British were continuing to trade with the indigenous tribes, specifically weapons and rum they were supplying.
In their view, the British were supplying the natives with the very weapons that they were then turning on the settlers.
Right, So there was this sentiment that the British was putting profits over people.
Shocker, right, Like that doesn't define every every relationship between the government and the government.
Yeah, So this this fiery tempered Scots Irish fellow named James Smith, who had fought in the French and anymore hadn't been in a captive of a tribe for I think it says in the movie three Years.
I don't know if that's an exaggeration of the actual account, but Smith organized a militia group that they called the Black Boys because they painted their faces black and red and in order to camouflage themselves in the film, that's straight up red face.
Historically, I can't say whether it was that from the accounts that I read it, it's in order to they blackened their faces so that they could camouflage themselves in the woods war paint, right, Yes, So all of these guys that were fighting with Smith were veterans of frontier warfare, and they were both in the typical Appalachian Scott's Irish way.
They hated everybody, they hated.
They didn't care for the British, especially not the British authority, and they didn't care for the tribes who were unhappy with their expansion.
So a British Indian agent named George Crohan, who is in the film, is played by Dunlevy.
Brian Dunlevy was transporting goods through western Pennsylvania to Fort Pitt, and settlers, fearing that the goods will be used against them in future raids, ambushed and destroyed the wagon train, and that resulted in British officials denouncing them and sending a detachment of soldiers to arrest Smith and the men.
But from the Black Boys perspective, they were upholding the provincial law right.
So there was this kind of pre revolutionary struggle that sort of prefigures on the Tea Party and the Boston Tea Party and all of that of this rejection of British authority under the auspices of provincial law and this demand that they be allowed to more or less govern themselves.
So the British soldiers occupy Fort Loudon, they attempt to arrest Smith and his followers, surrounded the fort, put it under siege, and eventually force the British to negotiate and withdraw.
So this again is a sort of opening volley of what would eventually erupt as the Revolutionary War.
Speaker 2Now did they actually now in the movie they this is skipping ahead.
But in the movie they shoot at the fort.
Yeah, and they and they, but they tell people to shoot to like aim over people's heads basically, so they don't actually kill anybody, and they just keep shooting over and over again.
It is there any evidence that it played out like that at all?
Or is that just for the movie or do you know?
Speaker 3From what I read there were few, if any casualties, and the siege, which may have included some shooting, was conducted at such a range, just like in the movie, that the shots were unlikely to hurt anybody.
Okay, gotcha, But certainly you know, didn't help anybody's mood.
Speaker 2Yeah, being shot at it never helps anyone's mood.
Speaker 3You know, you're the centuries weren't able to you know, just take a leak over the side of the outside of the wall as they were accustomed.
Speaker 2Yeah, that's for sure.
I will.
I know, I know you've got a lot to say about this movie.
So what did you think of Allegheny?
Upright?
Speaker 3So I find this movie really fascinating from a historical standpoint, not just the real history that we've been referencing, but from the standpoint of film history.
Because this movie is also nineteen thirty nine.
It was shot after Stagecoach.
Republic had lent John Wayne to RKO, so this was not, as you know, well resourced a film as Stage Coach, but it was definitely a step up in terms of budget from the Republic pictures, and it paired him again with Claire Trevor, who again top line the movie.
But if you watch these movies back to back, which I'm not advocating, you'll be quite amazed at how little Claire Trevor is allowed to do in this film.
She is and I don't know if you agree with me or not, but she is reduced and it's it's hurtful to see her reduced to the thinnest characterization of a tough frontiers woman who just can't quit this John Wayne fella who who mistreats her.
Jim Smith, I should say, who mistreats her every step of the way.
She's her character is I don't want to use the word shrill, but I don't know what other word to use.
Speaker 2Oh, yeah, she absolutely is.
Speaker 3She's really given the bad end of the stick in this this movie, and for her to top line and and for it to come after such a you know, her role in Stagecoach is in some ways a stereotypical role, but as we discussed before, she gets to do so much more with that.
Yes, here, there is no nuance whatsoever.
She is the Scottish daughter of a Scottish man working at a tavern and pining over Jim Smith, who is constantly leaving for months, even years at a time because he just has to see what's out there.
You know.
Speaker 2Yeah, I mean she gives it.
It's I mean, it's definitely a very energetic performance, I would say, but it's just so one note and that note is is a note that I don't want to see played for the amount of screen time that it is played for.
It's a shame because yeah, because she's so awesome in Stagecoach, but here, like I would never say it's a bad performance because I think she's probably doing what she's written and directed to do.
Yeah, but yeah, it just seeing what she's capable of and then seeing what she's given here.
It's it's kind of a shame, really.
Speaker 3Yeah, and the top line the film and then be sidelined by all the male characters in ways that are rarely funny and instead just frequently uncomfortable.
Is not that great to watch her character.
I mean, she plays Janie McDougall, the tavern owner's daughter.
She's a tomboy character.
Her father Mac McDougall, played by Wilfred Lawson in one of the most irritating performances I've ever seen in cinema.
Wilfrid Lawson does a caricature of a drunk Scotsman that obliterates previous stereotypical performances that one may have seen.
Speaker 2It's brutal, he is, Oh, it's so awful, especially anytime he gets really loud and yells and oh it's horrible.
Speaker 3Yeah, and it's it's almost a prototype for the drunken hillbilly characters that we'll see in the decades to come.
Speaker 2Yeah, I felt like he he would be used better, like in a rob zombie movie than in this because he's so he's just so obnoxious.
Speaker 3It's it's horrible, Rob Zomb, That's actually a good idea.
I was thinking of an episode of Dukes of Hazzard.
But yeah, if it were Dukes of Hazard as directed by Rob Zombie, he would absolutely fit.
Speaker 2I would actually I would watch that, all right.
I would definitely check that out.
Speaker 3Let's do another another film version of Dukes of Hazard but darker.
Yeah, yeah, but.
Speaker 2Yeah, did you have any other thoughts or do you want me to kind of share some of mine?
Speaker 3Yeah?
Well, I'm very curious because I know that you watched this for the first time.
This was shockingly my fourth or fifth time, So oh wow, I've got not you know, all bunched together or anything.
But just over the years I've got it was released on DVD, I don't know, twenty years ago now, has not been upgraded to Blu ray as of this recording.
And you know, every now and then over the years I've put it on, and every time I'm reminded why it's both interesting and appalling.
Speaker 2Yes, absolutely, yes, so asy as a movie like Jess, as a kind of a piece of entertainment.
I didn't enjoy it.
It does have a couple of moments that I thought were pretty good now after being I don't really know what word I would use it maybe stunned the first time I saw John Wayne and the rest of his crew in red face and red body, I guess as well.
In that action scene where they attack the Native Americans in the river, that scene is pretty fun, like when they're jumping out of the trees into the river.
That that I enjoyed.
And there is an interesting moment after this scene where John Wayne as Jim Smith, he stops McDougall from killing one of the natives, and and and then Wayne like he talks to him and you know, whatever language the Native Americans speaks, and then for some reason, the professor translates what's what the Native American is saying?
Like John Wayne can't understand, but but the the Native American basically says that they wiped out all of these people.
And then a man I don't know, I actually don't know the character, but somebody behind John Wayne or behind you know, Jim Smith nudges John Wayne's arm and in that hand he's holding a knife and he ends up stabbing the Native American.
Do you know what do you want Tom, referring to.
Speaker 3Yeah, I can't remember the name of the character, but he is, he's a Tom.
Speaker 2Tom nudges his arm.
Are you thinking of the Native American or the to the guy who nudges John Wayne.
Speaker 3I'm thinking of the guy.
I thought it might be Shoot.
I can't remember the character's name.
I don't think it was Tom Calhoun.
Speaker 2Well, but anyway, anyways, like after and so the Native America, he's he's killed because the hand that the arm of the man nudges, that hand is holding a knife and he stabs him.
And one thing that Jim Smith says, it's kind of interesting.
It is Jim Smith says that white people taught the Native people.
Uh no, no, we we teach them everything.
We teach them everything.
Speaker 3Don't we write how to be Treacherous?
Right?
Speaker 2Yeah?
Which I thought was a very interesting kind of commentary on like white people like teaching Native Americans how to slaughter?
Speaker 3Did?
Did?
Speaker 2But that did that stand out to you at all?
Speaker 3Yeah?
That moment's important because it really differentiates John Wayne's character, Jim Smith, from the rest of the mob, and because he, you know, walks along the Natives as a scout and and as someone who had been you know, captured and adopted into the tribe for several years.
We're given to feel like he understands them as human beings better, right, And even though the rhetoric of the film, as every other character describes indigenous people is as nothing but bloodthirsty, drunken savages, Myth occasionally points out where they get the rum, you know where, and as you said, right, where they learn their these tactics from, and so on.
It's a it's a it's a strange moment, right when when the sort of hot headed character whose name we can't remember, you know, forces or pushes Jim Smith's knife into the captive uh, indigenous guy.
Because throughout the rest of the film we see these these settlers as more or less heroic.
Yes, but in that moment and a couple of you know, a couple of other little ones, uh, there's a little bit of acknowledgment or commentary on the settler's c culpability in the whole conflict, which is you know, worth worth worth noting.
Speaker 2Yeah, yeah, I thought that that was pretty interesting.
And of course, of course this is all this is in the same movie where I think there is a point I don't know if they say this exactly, but I think McDougall or maybe the Professor says something along the lines of like, the only good Indian is a dead Indian.
Speaker 3Yeah, that's that's uh the.
Speaker 2And this character is a hero in my movie.
Speaker 3Right, I think that's McDougall who says.
Speaker 2That, Okay, good, because I already wanted most Anyways, the.
Speaker 3Professor character, who's played by John F.
Hamilton, who's probably best known as Pops in on the Waterfront, is a bit more as the name implies, reserved and cerebral.
But that scene that we're that we're referencing is the only scene in which indigenous characters actually appear.
The rest of the time, like as in most of Stagecoach, they're merely spoken of as this constant dangerous presence, this impending sense of the doom.
The real opponents, the real enemies in this film are the British soldiers and perhaps more importantly and more to my heart, those goddamn capitalists the traders.
The traders who care nothing but for their profit margins.
Right, and there there's a great scene where all the Brian Don Levy is together with all the rest of the traders and there and they're talking about their profit margins versus the the the dead, you know, settlers, and how they'll manipulate the British soldiers into protecting the very goods that they're supposed to be forbidding traveling through the territory to eventually end up in the hands of the of the indigenous.
So we've got we've got quite a matrix of conflict, right.
You've got the so called bloodthirsty savage natives, You've got the blood thirsty manufacturers traders of goods.
You've got the arrogant and rigid British soldiers, and then you've got the practical, down to earth and constantly drunk settlers.
Yeah.
Speaker 2Yeah, now I.
Speaker 3Should say I'm making this sound better than it is.
This is I don't think as it would be anyone's idea of unobjectively great movie.
Speaker 2Oh no, yeah, I don't see how it could be either.
I will say it.
Speaker 3Now.
Speaker 2I actually watched this twice because it it did.
It held my interest pretty well for about fifty minutes, and then it really started to lose me, and so I needed to watch it again.
The scene where they shoot up the fort that Sanders and Dunley vy are in.
I feel like that should have been the climax.
I can't believe the movie continues after that.
Speaker 3Right, yeah, that should have been the end.
Speaker 2And let's see, where was I going with that?
Oh yeah, And I know John Wayne was not fond of this movie.
He said that he's only ever played one cautious part in his life in Allegheny Uprising, and he said it was a rather dull character.
And I agree, it is a very dull character.
But I'll also add he doesn't bring anything to this performance, and at times it's I think it's laughably bad.
His voice when he's wounded is hilarious to me, Like his weak wounded voice or whatever is so funny.
But yeah, I'm trying to think, I I if I have anything else to really add outside of that.
Now, now, the the the the credits.
Now, now, when the credits are are mentioned, you know you don't have a great movie.
But the credits illuminated by the handheld lanterns was kind of fun.
Speaker 3Oh yeah, that was a really cool touch.
Almost in the in the pre presaging the rite of Paul Revere.
Speaker 2Right, yes, yes, absolutely.
Speaker 3That credit sequences as a as a boy is coming through and illuminating.
Yeah, each each credit.
Well, that was that was pretty cool.
It was a cool start.
Speaker 2Yeah.
Oh and you know one thing I wanted to mention.
I meant to say when you were talking about the context this gives to Stagecoach is one thing that's kind of interesting is this is an RKAO movie, and of course RKO turned down Stage Coach and then they immediately cast its stars in a movie the same year after it was a success.
Speaker 3Didn't work out though, This movie lost over two hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 2That's why, Oh it did.
Oh, I didn't look at the box office.
Speaker 3Big money loser, partly because it ended up being it was banned, right, it was banned in Britain.
Speaker 2Ya, it was banned in Britain, And I guess, and it came out.
Didn't this come out a week or two after Drums along the Mohawk?
Speaker 3Yes?
Yeah, and it was right, it was.
It was considered harmful to British morale because it is very anti British.
He has not.
I can't argue with that, right, And I think that's really the most interesting thing about the movie is, uh that it is very anti colonial and it's it's released.
You know, in a year where you know, the United States has had just kind of allied itself with Britain.
Though we hadn't entered World War Two yet, we were certainly providing support to the Allies.
And so this film was kind of contrary to the propagandistic sentiment that we that we it was the wrong kind of propaganda.
It was propaganda that would have been fine any other time.
But the movie as as kind of representing the mythology of the revolutionary spirit, I think really captures the at least the textbook bullet points right.
The British are overly bureaucratic there in their snobby they look down their noses at the unwashed settlers.
The settlers, of course in this region are primarily of Scott's Irish origin, so there's already that tension.
And George Sanders, of course the ultimate dismissive elitist snob, right, I mean, the character that he's so good at.
He provides most of the tension in the first half of the film, and then in the third act the tact on third act that we both feel like shouldn't have been there, which is the show trial of Jim Smith, over which Sanders presides as Captain Swanson, he provides the most comic relief absolutely before going down in his own little tragedy.
We should talk about that character, Captain Swanson, who as a as a character flaw, does not care to listen to what anybody has to say.
No, and he's great, you know, It's that it's a it's a rule that I'm sure Sanders wasn't too interested in either way.
And I read that Claire Trevor said that Sanders did not make many friends in the cast, kind of ignored everyone and wouldn't even take his meals with him.
That may have been to get into character, or it may have just been how he felt.
But this character, you know, Captain Swanson, follows orders to the letter, will not deviate no matter what new information is presented.
Looks with utter disdain and contempt upon the settlers who are unwashed and undisciplined.
Couldn't seem to care less about the indigenous people.
He barely they barely even register to him.
Yeah, there might be some some people who get in his way marching from point A to point B, but he's particularly contemptuous of Jim Smith John Wayne, who refuses to submit to authority.
Speaker 2Yeah, yeah, he's he's something.
Now.
He he does have some good some good quotes.
I mean you said he was kind of the movies only he's really the only source of humor.
Speaker 3Yeah, well he's he's kind of that.
He's got the the repeated lines of the prototypical Karen lines.
Right, somebody will say something he doesn't like, and he'll say, arrest that man.
Yeah.
You could play a drinking game with this movie.
Every time George Sanders calls for someone to be arrested, take a drink.
You won't make it far.
Speaker 2Yeah.
Speaker 3In the show, Well, I know that you loved this line as well.
But there's a great forensic scene, right would you would you like to describe the scene.
Speaker 2Oh sure, yeah, So there there's this scene.
So I don't know how much I need to say to kind of set this up, but basically, earlier in the movie, Jim Smith is with another character, it might be Chill Wills character.
I can't remember, yes, who the actor was, and I think Brian Dunleavy or somebody he was with shoots Chill Wills and then John Wayne's gun goes off, right, but his his rifle is like aimed up in the air, so there's no way he could have shot him.
But they pin the killing on John Wayne Jim Smith.
I'll try to use the character's name, because sometimes sometimes I end up using Saint John Wayne or Jim's or the character's name, and I want to try to be a little more consistent.
But and so he's on trial for this character's death.
And Claire Trevor does a demonstration basically showing how it would have been impossible for Smith to be the one to have shot him.
And so she I think, she shoots like a shirt from far away and then shoots it up close.
Is that right?
Speaker 3Yeah?
Speaker 2Yes?
Speaker 3The size of the bullet holes on the burn.
Speaker 2Yes, yes, and so and so there's all this smoke in the room from the from the shots, and and Sanders says, this is decidedly irregular and smelly.
Speaker 3And then he follows it out, Oh, this is something that I feel like I want to say to my children so many, so many times, he goes, how many more of these detonations are we to endure?
What a what a great line, And you know you have to wait the whole movie to hear it, but it's almost worth another great great one, you know, of course, the the the audience in the in the courtroom erupt into applause or booze as the trial goes on, and in trying to call the the proceedings to order, Sanders says, any lout who feels the need of airing his spleen at the expense of the court's decorum will find himself dining on bread and water.
Just so so grandiloquent and a perfect again contrast to the monosyllabic japing of McDougall.
Speaker 2Oh yeah, yeah, Sanders is definitely he is the only the only actor, urber performer who he provides any any laughs, and they are they are not intentional, but at least it gives you something to enjoy, gives you something.
Speaker 3And again, you know, in nineteen thirty nine, Wayne made Stagecoach, Yes, but also what six or seven movies for Republican, including at least three of the Three Musketeers films, and then Allegheny Uprising for RKO, which is kind of a in between movie, right, and as you noted, was rushed into production after the successive Stagecoach, So he's still kind of at the mercy of the lowest of low budget you know, he hasn't hit yet, I guess.
In nineteen forty he does Dark Command with Raul Walsh, which I guess we may talk about at some point.
Speaker 1No.
Speaker 3Yeah, and then the non Western film The Long Voyage Home for john Ford, his second john Ford film, also nineteen forty, seafaring film in which Wayne plays a Swede and it does attempt the accent on occasion.
Speaker 2Not great, No, it's not great.
Speaker 3The movie itself is pretty amazing.
Greg Toland was the cinematographer.
It's beautiful, but Wayne's Swedish accent, ain't it.
But anyway, back to Allegetting Uprising, and this extreme contrast between the bureaucratic rigidity and class structure right of the British against the egalitarian, informal, earthy settlers is is the key.
I mean, that's the big the big tape takeaway right, the revolutionary spirit, frontier justice, you know something, man's just going to take care of himself versus the impersonal bureaucratic law.
And it's very much part of the self mythologization of America in both the propaganda films that that came out around World War Two and the Western genre in general, which is one of the reasons.
I really pushed to see this as a Western because I feel like it it is part of that mythical lineage, right of yah, of manifest destiny, of carving civilization out of the wilderness, and you know, white by white men and coonskin hats wikiped.
He actually points out that this is one of four films in which John Ware John Wayne wears the coonskin cap.
Speaker 2So, well, what's this the Fighting Kentucky and in the Alamo?
What's what's another one?
Speaker 3What's the other one?
The Big Trail?
Speaker 2Oh, the Big Trail of course.
Yeah, Oh my gosh, how soon we forget?
Yeah?
Speaker 3But yeah, right, since Drums along the Mohawk comes out the same year, so you see what john Ford is producing, right, and Wayne is just not He hasn't broken through yet, right, this is before he's any kind of superstar.
Speaker 2Yeah, in Northwest Passage might be the same year, or yes, around the same time, the same year.
Okay, yeah, so yeah, so three sort of colonial Westerns, all all kind of in a row.
I No, I have not seen Drums along the Mohawk in a long time, but yeah, is it western enough to be?
Speaker 3Uh?
Speaker 2And I know it's not.
John Wayne but is it Western enough to be covered on the podcast you think, or is that more historical drama?
Speaker 3I think so.
I mean I'd argue for it, although it certainly would be a stretch, okay, But in terms of themes, I think it's consistent with where the Western is beginning to go.
I mean Stagecoach, right is the is the is considered the moment, right the tipping point where the Western kind of matures as a genre as opposed to just to be action or with no coherent I don't want to sound like a film professor or anything, but prior to Stage Coach, there was no coherent ideology right of the of the Western and with film, and I think Allegheny Uprising does contribute to the ideology of the Western in ways that are less nuanced than than some of the great filmmakers like Ford, like Walsh.
But when you when people think of the stereotypical Western ideology, this is it, right, the savage Indians, the the heroic frontiersman, and the out of touch government, not to mention the avaricious capitalists, right right, So it's all it's it's it's all right there, all right?
Speaker 2Well, I yeah, I don't really have.
I don't think any any other really anything else to say about this movie.
Do you kind of do you have anything else?
Speaker 3I think it's appropriate that this is one of our shorter conversations.
I agree, if there had been something, you know, similar to Allegheny Uprising, we could have paired it with we might have extended the conversation.
But but for me, you know, since we kind of have this John Wayne journey that we're taken together, I really wanted to note it as a not It's not significant enough to be a counterpoint.
It's more like a adjacent doorstop as stagecoach like rides into legendary status as a film.
Yeah, Allegheny Uprising sits at this tipping point for the genre, tipping point for the country.
You know this again, World War two has incalculable effects on the world and the film industry.
And yeah, just kind of a sign post, that's what we'll call it.
A sign post, Yeah, in the development of the genre and the trajectory of Wayne's career.
Right, he's still a B movie actor in nineteen thirty nine.
Speaker 2Oh absolutely, Yeah, a sign post.
Yeah, illuminated by a little handheld lantern.
Speaker 3The British are coming slowly in information.
You can't miss them all.
Speaker 2Right, Well, well this was short, but like you said, this was worth doing because it's a it's a fun movie to talk about.
I mean, I will say I'm never gonna watch this movie again.
Speaker 3Twice twice, but.
Speaker 2I did watch it twice, and it was back to back mornings.
Yeah, that first morning, I yeah, I just got I'd say around the fifty minute mark, I just got a little distracted and a little bored.
So I felt like I owed it to the movie.
I didn't want to go into it and go into this really only being moderately familiar with the first fifty minutes.
So I'm glad I put my phone and I left it in the kitchen because that's what distracted me the first time around.
And then I just was like, Okay, I'm just going to pay attention to this thing.
Speaker 3It's I'm not recommending it to listeners, but I'm not not recommending it either.
The movies all over the place in terms of its tone.
You know, we didn't One thing we didn't really get into was the fact that the British Army, under the direction of Sanders' character, tortures right basically tortures innocent settlers in order to flush Jim Smith out, you know, of hiding when he's and it changes the tone to this kind of oh okay, well, this isn't just comic relief or an issue of you know, misunderstanding.
This is people are getting hurt here, and so it kind of raises the stakes for that kangaroo court uh sequence that we mentioned.
But again, it's such a jarring transition from the climax siege of the Fort, in which it's kind of like watching the Return of the King.
You know, you think the movie is going to end, yeah, several times before it actually does.
But in those in those continuations, those extensions, there's more stuff that complicates the the the viewing experience.
So yeah, I appreciate you you including it in our ongoing discussion, and I'm happy to move on to Dark Passage next.
Speaker 2Oh absolutely, all right, Well, well will Will Willere can, where can people find you on social media?
Speaker 3Now?
Speaker 2You had mentioned you were going to up your social media presence to me?
Have you done that?
Speaker 3I have posted more on Instagram primarily so W.
W.
Doudson fifty two, the same handles on Twitter and Blue Sky, but I have not yet caught up with those two in terms of activity.
However, in a couple of months, I'm gonna be I won't be able to talk about it yet, but maybe on the next episode.
I'm going to be part of a well gigantic to me but very niche small event around Halloween that that I'll promote.
That'll be on Twitter and Blue Sky some some live tweeting.
What do they call blue tweets on Blue Sky Live?
Speaker 2Oh, I have no idea.
I have a Blue Sky.
I may have posted a couple times on it and that and that's it.
For some reason.
Yeah, it's like it's too new to me and I just don't even think about it.
Speaker 3I'm so Yeah, I remain an aspirational social media user, but Instagram has has pretty much.
If I'm if I'm involved in anything worth knowing about, it's on Instagram.
Speaker 2Okay, all right, well we'll This was tremendous.
Thank you so much.
Speaker 3Oh.
Thanks, Yeah, it's always great to talk with Yea.
Speaker 2I'pe enjoyed this episode.
I really enjoy talking about Allegheny uprising with Will.
But I will say, to take a line from my favorite movie podcast film Junk, I'm retiring this movie.
I will not be watching it again, but it was worth watching so Will and I could have this conversation.
What did you think of this week's episode and what John Wayne movies are you most looking forward to?
Will and I covering.
You can let me know by emailing me or on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook, and all the links are in the episode description.
Next week, David Lambert is returning and we've got a pretty special episode for you.
We're going to be talking about the Lancer Pilot and its connection to Quentin Tarantino's Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and its novelization.
I'll leave a link to the Lancer Pilot and the description for anyone who wants to check it out before next week.
Until then, if you're looking for more film related podcasts, please check out other shows on the Someone's Favorite Productions podcast network.
Thanks for listening.
Speaker 4Hello, Filthy movie lovers.
My name is Gentry Austin Now and we're the hosts of the Sin Syndicate Film podcast for Something weirdos Anti Criterion Brose and Joseph Sarno of Ficionados join us semi weekly as we peer into the adults only theaters in sticky floored cinemas of the golden age of sexploitation, when the morals were loose, the laws were murky, and the intercourse was all simulated.
Find us now on the Someone's Favorite Productions Podcast Network.
Speaker 1Thank you for listening.
To hear more shows from the Someone's Favorite Productions podcast Network.
Please please select the link in the description.