This is outside.

Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders.

The show that is to common sense, conservative values and healthy climate skepticism, what the modern progressive left are to.

Well, here's a Babylon Bee sketch about a woke progressive left wing woman who travels back in time in order to in order to fulfill her fantasy about murdering Adolf Hitler.

I'm a time traveler from the year twenty twenty five, and I've come here to kill you Hitler.

I'm a progressive, a liberal, a fighter for social justice.

But wouldn't they get chatting?

She discovers, much to her horror, that she, well, she rob has a lot in common with him.

Soon, we will be able to take back the White House, and we will be able to use the government to force people to follow our great ideas.

You want to use government power to force your ideas on the populace, me too, That's what does the show.

No, No, you and I have nothing in common.

What I'm saying is there are people in our time with dangerous ideas, and we need to silence.

Them, silencing those who disagree with you.

I do that too.

Yes, this is a question I've always asked myself too.

How many of today's woke authoritarian progressives are aware of the historical precedents backing up their socialist utopian fantasies.

Oh, this could be true.

This has to be some sort of mistake.

We are nothing alike.

You're Adolf Hiller evel right wing fascist dictator, and I'm a fan is restorative just as advocated.

You're a vegetarian, you're a vegetarian.

We do.

Brilliant work there from our friends at the Babylon b And while we wait for young woke women to come to their senses, let's grab the latest outside of his news.

And what a week it's been for Anthony Albnizy on the global stage, Reata and James.

We've had the un speech and magnificent speech from Donald Trump.

Will be speaking about Nettin Yah Who's speech.

Later on, James will be speaking about all the business is happening with James Comy and Rita will of course give us a reality check.

But let's kick off.

There's so much to go through that's happened this week.

Let's just kick off with a couple of things from Donald Trump, in my view, one of the great speeches it's ever taken place at the United Nations.

But first of all, here he is just one of his many comments on climate change.

Years ago, in the name teen twenties and the nineteen thirties, they said global cooling will kill the world.

We have to do something.

Then they said global warming will kill the world.

But then it started getting cooler, so now they could just call a climate change, because that way they can't miss climate change, because if he goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, this climate change.

It's the greatest conjob ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion.

The greatest conjob ever perpetrated on the world.

Riza I don't disagree with him, I have to say it.

No, he has absolute disdain for the UN.

He knows has become a destructive body that is completely not fit for purpose.

But he goes along there and he tells them what's what.

And you know what, James, I remember when he gave an address in his first term and the German contingent were they're giggling and laughing at him as he told them, you have become dependent on Russian energy, Russian gas, and it's going to be to your detriment.

And they thought it was hilarious.

They don't think it's hilarious anymore, do that.

No, they don't think it's hilarious.

And in fact, you know, it wasn't just climate, but it was also the other issues of immigration and Palestine.

Though, let's look at the immigration.

What Truck has to say about that.

Not only is the UN not solving the problems it should, too often, it's actually creating new problems.

For us to solve.

The best example is the number one political issue of our time, the crisis of uncontrolled migration.

It's uncontrolled.

Your countries are being ruined.

The United Nations is funding an assault on Western countries and their borders.

In twenty twenty four, the UN budgeted three hundred and seventy two million dollars in cash assistance to support and estimated six hundred and twenty four thousand migrants journeying into the United States.

And I mean, how great and clear was that, because he went on later on in the speech to say your countries are going to hell, going to hell.

He's really strong language about this.

Donald Trump is an ardent nationalist.

He believes in his country, and he believes not only in his country, but he believes that what makes each country unique and distinctive should be preserved against the globalists who want to see them all homogenized into a one world government sort of affair.

And this point here about the migration was so important.

We see it in Europe, we see this in Australia, and in a little bit we're going to have to talk.

I think about how so many on the left and the progressive left are trying to shut down this really important discussion about what's happening to all of our countries.

You're just the left.

There's some so called conservative commentators who seem to be missing the point as well.

And this homogenized many it's not throughout the world, because we don't see this drive to have immigration and diversity in countries across the world.

It's a Western project.

It's to dilute the West's culture and influence.

And he put it all out there.

But I spoke to Douglas Murray shortly after that speech.

You wrote a book a decade ago about the strange death of Europe, and it goes beyond Europe.

It's happening right here in Australia and elsewhere, and for too long, if you wanted to speak about this, if you wanted to speak about migration numbers in terms of anything other than economic factors.

There was almost taboo.

It was almost, well, no, this is racism, bigotry.

No, it's not.

To talk about preserving values.

And you can preserve your values and still have migration.

You just have an obligation on those who come to your country to respect those values and to assimilate into those values rather than have their own set of values that often are at odds with that country's way of life.

And that's what we have not really spoken about in this country much either.

Well, just picking up on the thing readers said before about Donald Trump going into the United Nations, and this was the key thing because he point you know, he basically said, the emperor has no clothes.

He ripped off the blanket and showed the United Nations to us for what it is, because it's the United Nations that has driven the whole climate change hoax scam.

He called it a conjob.

He kept repeating these words in the belly of the Beast, where it all comes from.

The entire climate change narrative pushed around the world is driven by the United Nations.

Then the same with immigration.

He pointed to the makers the United Nations who are pushing and driving the immigration into Europe, these vast numbers of uncontrolled, as he said, now we have a different problem in here.

We have controlled migration.

Attle bit of the Albanezy government has kind of gone, okay, anybody come on in in your.

Yeah, this is a big myth that we need to address here in this country.

Everybody says, oh, we're an island.

We control who comes to the country.

You know, we know who they are and all of that, and yeah, sure, fine, we stopped the boats, John Howard stopped the boats.

That's absolutely right.

But you know, we also know so many other things are really rotten about this system, to the point now where it is almost uncontroll or it's barely controlled.

You know, you have got more than half of the people here on student visus are not here going to a university.

They're going to a trade school or some sort of thing, and they may or may not be doing the course.

There's a lot of these ghost colleges.

You have got in this country.

One hundred thousand people who have exhausted every single last avenue, tribunal, court of appeal, all taxpayer funded by the way to adjudicate their claims to be an asylum seeking, their claims to be a refugee.

Well, you know, got one hundred thousand of them.

They've exhausted every single often.

They're still here to live and work in the community, essentially, essentially illegally, because there is no appetite to actually go and deport them.

So everybody knows that the system is a soft touch.

You come, you apply, you stay, they kick you out.

You're still here.

Yeah, no, and you're absolutely right, that's because the government is useless.

Yeah, well don't control, because we have a use of the government.

So the useless government are uncontrolling everything.

They don't control the economy properly, they certainly don't control.

They're not looking out for our free speech.

We'll get a old of that.

The system is there and the government is useless.

That is a slot.

I agree with you that they're very, very similar.

But in Europe it is literally just waves, it is.

And but here the government, you're right, should be controlling.

They have the leavers, they should be controlling you one hundred percent correct on that.

But let's let's go to the next thing, which I think was really important, and we're going to talk about digital idea and a tick as well with what's happening on that.

But thing of Trump's was of course attacking directly attacking Australia, Canada, France and Britain for recognizing Palestine.

I'll be talking about this when I talk about his speech later on in the show, but have a listen to Trump here.

Unfortunately, Hamas has repeatedly rejected reasonable offers to make peace.

We can't forget October seventh, can we now?

As if to encourage continued conflict, some of this body seeking to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state.

The rewards would be too great for Hamas terrorists for their atrocities.

This would be a reward for these horrible atrocities, including October seventh, even while they refuse to release the hostages or accept the cease fire.

Instead of giving to Hamas and giving so much because they've taken so much, they have taken so much.

This could have been.

Solved so long ago.

But instead of giving in Hamas's ransom demands, those who want piece should be united with one message, release the hostages now.

Just release the hostages now.

And what great words from President Trump, they're released the hostages now and more important, where As importantly, he's saying, why our Australia you know, and other nations rewarding the Hamas terrorists, the abductors, Why are they rewarding them Rita.

And it's also putting a rift between our relationship with our biggest and most important ally America.

So again, why are we doing this when it's not in Australia's national interest to be doing this exactly?

James, Well, you know, this whole thing with Palestine has been going on since the very start, Like this whole Palestinian recognition was entirely predictable.

We saw the very weak response, let us not forget the very weak both sides response that this government had two October seventh after it happened, Penny Wong calling for restraint.

Right, and now you've got this what I call the Albanesy Wong doctrine.

Although it's not really a doctrine, you know, that implies some sort of thought, but no, it's more a sort of notion, you know, and it's just sort of any that well, if we recognize them, you know, hey, Palestinians, you know that somehow you're going to wind up with them wanting to make peace.

But of course this is always, always, always in the Middle East, the triumph of hope over reality, right, because we know we know what happens with this movie we've seen a million times before.

Hamas of course, declares this a huge win.

All he has done is to legitimize the bad guys.

And you know, he's even diffident about even calling the you know, the sides of this thing bad guys are a good Now.

Trump showed in his first term, he really showed that decades of dogma were incorrect.

The US, the West thought that you can't have peace, you can't have normalization with Arab nations without the Palestinine issue being resolved.

And Donald Trump showed through the Abraham Accords that is not the case.

And he really turned everything around.

And for France, UK Australia to ignore that learning and just to go back to this notion of we have to recognize a state, what are you recognizing?

How is that even workable?

How are you.

Going to who's going to be the authority there?

Are you going to have her mass two point zero?

Well asgotiating with Israel, is that the two states where around yes.

I mean, I'm glad you mentioned the Abraham Accords and everything that Trump did in that first term, because what he did was he revealed that Palestine is actually an obsession of the West, exactly, Palestine Ara not an obsession of the Arab world.

Australia took three thousand refugees from Gaza.

How many have countries like Jordan taken none?

Right, because they have a much difference.

So I always say, lived experience with the Palestinian situation, and they're not big fans of it, and they read it very differently.

And it had always historically been a way to, you know, have maintain a thorn in the side of Israel in the West.

But in terms of this idea of Palestine right return and all these sorts of things, you know, they had no interest in that.

And if you went to Dubai, or you went to Cairo right now, or you went to Amman, Jordan, and you went out there and started waving a Palestinian flag around saying hey, you know, justice for Palestine, Free Palestine, you'd have a rather bad end to.

Your dad, James.

I think I recall a bunch of poems and other westerners a lot of Europeans.

Y I did do that via Egypt, tried to reach Shaza waving their flags, and.

The forces pressed brutal force.

That's basically what happened.

I just want to briefly get touched back on your control uncontrolled immigration thing.

Let's not forget, of course, was Tony Abbott who's stopped the boats first of all, and then ever since then it's kind of been let's just you know, all the grief we got at the time about how evil and racist we were to be doing that.

But more importantly, I agree with your question about is the government actually doing in proper job.

We had Tony Burke with the loads of gardens coming in.

We're bringing in you're talking about Palestine, We're bringing garzens.

There's very limited vetting appears to be going on, and you know, the rest of the world is saying, we'll hang on.

Maybe we shouldn't be taking this number of people in who have come from such an anti Semitic environment, anti Western environment.

So you're absolutely right that the government is not controlling immigration, even though it could be, and I think that's a really important point.

Halbo meanwhile, suddenly has found he quite likes Donald Trump.

According to what he said on Sky earlier.

Do you like Donald Trump from what you've seen so far on your phone calls?

Well, I do warm the conversations that we've had, and he was very generous in the comments that he made when we discussed after my re election.

I look forward to sitting down with him.

He looks forward to sitting down with him.

Let's know that Trump is on fine form when he does.

Because I think there's a few things Donald Trump would like to say.

Selfie is an official We've got an official photo.

Can we talk about another photo though, Yes, let's talk about that.

I was going to say that leads us next to Kevin Rudd's role.

Does Kevin Rudd like he seems to found a new friend.

So we've got here on your screen.

You've got the selfie there between Alban Easy and Donald Trump.

But there was another photo this week that came out of this show.

This one here, it's Kevin Rudd having a big old hug with California Governor Gavin Newsom.

Do we have that picture there?

We can show it is this year.

Cringeh is there on the right.

Chris can I explained why this is so important here?

This is so important here because Kevin Rudd is, of course, you know, the ambassador to the US.

We know this, and we know that this was the most expensive way the government could find to shut down Run's Twitter account, which was of course calling all that trouble for labor when he was appointed.

But now he has gone and had this huge bear hug with the Governor of California, who is of course Donald Trump's He's basically the effectively the opposition leader of the Democrats.

He's attacking Donald Trump every single day.

He's probably going to be the Democrat nominee for the president in twenty twenty eight.

He's a huge opponent of everything Trump.

And we know that Rud has been this massive sticking point in the relationship.

Pretty smart, yeah, And we know that Rudd has been this huge sticking point in the relationship.

To go out there and have not just a handshake, not just a handshake, but a big old bring it in here hug.

I mean, this is such bad diplomacy.

Idiocy.

It is Rudd's ego again getting the better of what his role is supposed to be, which is to be promoting Australia's interests in the US.

We know he's effectively doing the opposite because the Trump administration cannot stand him, knows precisely who he is and what he has said and what his record is.

So he's actually an obstacle to US having better relations with the US, getting a decent trade deal, which is so critically important.

And then to be carrying on like that with a bloke who is himself Gavin Newsom not only overseeing the ruinous state of California and anyone who's been to California recently and sees the homelessness, the crime, just the degeneracy in that state, a state blessed with every natural resource you could Victoria, well kind of like Australia.

And he's also his record is got this bizarre ex Twitter persona at the moment where he's pretending to be Donald Trump and trying to post it.

Yeah it's not working, and is saying the most outrageous things just in recent days, really dangerous incitement.

I would call it against ICE agents.

And then we had a shooting at an ICE facility.

And again, if the media were fair dicome, that would be holding Gavin Newsom accountable for that.

But I can tell you the Trump administration is paying attention, and that would be paying attention to that carry on from.

What and Bowen standing there looking like he wanted to join in the hard unpleasant image, which I'll dispelled from my mind as rapidly as I can.

Bowen, you great wind mills and solar panelsman must have felt quite at home there with Newsom, who has, of course overseeing some of the highest electricity prices in the world for California, even they have all the natural resources we do.

But let's not which leads me to the next thing.

Why were these clowns altogether?

And as soon as he'd done the United Nations, Albo hot footed it over to Britain.

But where he is now very comfortably ensconced.

There's a labor conference he's going to.

He's been with Keir Starmer.

But now have a listen.

This is the new player.

We're going to hear a lot more of this.

Have a listened to Albanezi yesterday revealing what's really going on.

Well, I don't want to see the rise of populist organizations.

Such as that.

I met with the mainstream opposition party here and you know I'm involved in parties of governance.

Have to come up with solutions, not seek to divide people.

I'm just going to unpack this really really carefully.

Play pay close attention.

He was talking about Reform, Nigel Farage's Reform Party, which is sword in the polls and is highly likely that Farage will be in Downing Street within the next few years.

Now, what Albaneze is saying there, he's dismissing so called popular, so called far right parties.

Basically, what Albanezi is terrified of is the coalition being led by someone like Andrew Haystiage just enterprise, that sort of for populist read popular.

That's what populism means.

It means the large majority of people support you.

The large majority of people in Britain support Nigel Frage, they support reform, and this Prime Minister of ours basically saying I want a useless coalition.

I want a kind of conservative, weak need coalition like they have the conservative of the Tories there in Britain.

That way I can win an election.

Kirs Starmer won with a very low vote, as did Anthony Albaniez who won with a very low vote, and the coalition.

He wants the coalition to stay with Susan Lee to go down the Conservative Tory path.

There's sort of trees and they think, and that's what's happening.

What labor in this country are terrified of, is you, the mainstream people of Australia, the popular mainstream vote that won the voice, getting together and deposing these clowns out at the next election.

And we know the only way they can do that is if the right and it's not the far right, it's not the extreme right, it's just the right get their act together.

You need a good leader of the coalition.

You've got one nation working together with the Nationals and the Liberals, and that's the way to defeat these clowns.

And they know it, Rita, they know it.

They are terrified of the one party system being challenged because that's what we have currently.

We've got labor and labor lighte.

If you think Susan Lee is any sort of opposition, then you need to put down the crack pipe and have a look at reality, because she would be very comfortable in the tills, she'd be very comfortable in labor.

Let's be honest.

We don't have real choice at the moment.

And when he talks about like it, you're so right when it says populist, he's talking about about the democratic process, he's talking about majority rule.

He's said the same things about Donald Trump, and now he thinks he's Donald Trump's best mate.

Give me a break.

And as far as I met with the mainstream opposition, the mainstream opposition, you look at the polls in the UK, Reform is ahead of the Tories and it's often a head of labor.

So if you actually are talking to the mainstream, you'd be sitting down talking with Nigel Farage.

But he's not doing that, just like he didn't talk to Donald Trump when every sensible person told you Donald Trump was going to be the Republican candidate and most likely president again.

But no, he exists in this bubble where majority of Australian media exists, where they thought that was unthinkable.

How could Donald try?

How he's got convictions?

Well, I mean, how how could.

Let me?

Sorry James, on this point, let me just read an article by Paul Kelly.

A paragraph an article in The Australian by Paul Kelly quotes Australia must be beware, and James, I'll get you to pick up on this.

Australia must be where Trump is an isolationist, what's in the mad assaults on change and renewables while he attacks on immigration as a threat to national civilization.

He goes on Trump's politics don't work in Australia, not now, not ever.

Peter Darton learned this at the last election.

Paul Kelly, were you at a different election, We were a different lection that Trump was No, there was nowhere to be seen from the coalition.

Well there's this, you know, it's not just Paul Kelly, it's a lot of other journalists competent.

But let's espress what you having to see here, because it has you have to see this as you know, somehow the bat single has gone out on this here right, and you know, there's this idea that we are going to retrospectively rewrite the history of what happened in that last election when there was virtually nil policy that you could consider conservative at all coming out of the Coalition.

I mean, zilch, you know, not even nuclear they did right because they wanted to be paid for by the government.

You know, you had Peter Dutton filling up his ute twenty five times a day to talk about the petrol excise tax cut.

That was it.

When there was a real economic reform idea, like you know, indexing tax rates, they ran a million miles away from that.

They ran at the first whiff of grape shot on every single issue.

And I'll tell you you know, the first moment that we knew that the coalition was in serious trouble, it happened on Sky just before we went to air.

It was several weeks before the election was called, and Angus Taylor was on with Andrew Clenell and he was asked about the Medicare, the big Medicare spend that labor was about to do, and he said, yeah, well, well that we'll do a few billion more, you know.

And so like this idea, this idea, guys that somehow they ran this Trumpian campaign.

There was none of that.

They talk about anything.

They didn't talk about any of the big Trumpian issues.

They didn't talk about immigration at all.

They refused to nominate a number to cut it.

And in fact, they've only recently just clapped in a rhyme.

They embraced net zero, they embraced mass spending.

It wasn't that Donald Trump wasn't present in that election campaign.

It was that they were so spooked by his specter that they ran the opposite direction, and they ran forgot everything they should have learned from the Voice referendum where they finally actually stood for something, and guess what, they won resoundingly in every single state.

But no, all of those lessons were forgotten and we got another labor light.

And we see this as a Victorian, I have seen this so many times.

Every time the vig Libs, who are the most bedwetting coalition you co would ever imagine, every time they go to an election with no policies, no center right conservative conviction, and they get absolutely pummeled.

The lesson from that is, oh, well, that just shows you right wing politics doesn't work.

They've got to go more to the left.

No, if you actually give Victorians even a choice, as we had at the referendum, the majority voted this notion that the last election was a rejection of right wing politics.

There was no right wing politics from there is a price talked about making Australia right.

She had to apologize.

We want Australia to be we want a to be run down.

We wanted to be you know, we want to be like the Whitlam era you know.

But no, there's there's something really important here, you know, Kelly.

But also others have been basically clappy in this idea that Albinizi is going to rewrite Australian politics from being essentially sent to right to essentially center left right.

That has to be resistant.

But number two, there's this key word that everybody needs to talk about here and listen for it, because it's a big alarm bell.

That's mainstream, mainstream.

When you hear the word mainstream, think elite mainstream opinion says you cannot criticize large migration from all over the world and no assimilation and none of that sort of stuff, because that is what the elite groups want, and that is the business groups, that's the university groups that all have a big financial stake, the property development groups that all have a big financial stake in this big Australia, no matter the consequences of causes for people.

And you know, it's funny you look at there was a great study out of Europe a few months ago I wrote about it, and it found that across every European country, elites had a far different view of every one of these issues like migration than everybody else.

So hear mainstream, listen to it.

When you hear mainstream coming from the left, think minority.

Because this is like everything with the left, the words often mean the opposite to what they claimed me.

And when we on this show talk about the mainstream, we talk about the people who won the voice you out there.

We're going to take a short break.

After the break, reads it reabiting Check and Tony C.

Brook from w A chatting here live on Outsiders in a tech.

Welcome back.

You're watching Outsiders with your host Rowan social justice warrior, Dean James, white male, heteronomity, Privilegedmorrow and I read a pane here, and soon we'll be talking to Tony Seabrook about the way the ABC pushes its hysterical climate propaganda.

But first I regret to inform you that the celebrity class are at it again.

Just when we thought they decided to steer clear of politics, they're back out there with their daft, ill informed top ten.

Take tennis legend Serena Williams, who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars in her own right and has married this dude who's also worth hundreds of millions of dollars, you think life would be pretty swell.

She's healthy, she's wealthy, but certainly she's not wise.

You see, Serena is desperate to be a victim.

Watch this little performance at a New York City hotel she was staying at recently, and keep in mind she's chose to film this and share it with the world.

All Right, everyone, how do we feel about cotton as decoration?

Personally?

For me, it doesn't feel great.

So actually it feels like no polish women for cotton natural.

Yes, the evils of cotton plants, you know, the ones that go into those Nike garments she endorses.

Or are we supposed us to be alarmed that because at some point in history slaves picked cotton.

That means Serena carries some sort of generational trauma and the mere sight of cotton wool sends her into fits of idiocy.

I don't think so, darling.

We are done playing those games.

You care that much about slavery, Perhaps check out the conditions of some of those Nike factories staying in New York City.

When did the un become a platform for emotionally troubled NEPO babies to vent about their paranoid delusions.

No, I'm not talking about that one, the delusional misfit, but another one.

Violet Athlic, the rich, pampered and clearly overindulged, nineteen year old daughter of Hollywood superstars Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner.

She was given a platform at the un to spew this unmitigated nonsense.

But when it comes to the ongoing pandemic, our present is being stolen right in front of our eyes.

For adults, the relentless bit of back to normal, ignoring, downplaying, and concealing both the prevalence of airborne transmission and the threat of long COVID manifested in a series of choices.

Young people lacked both real choice in the matter and information about what was being chosen for us.

Every subsequent infection increases the risk of long COVID and pleases people who already have it in greater danger.

Here's what we don't know is what it does to reinfect children over and over and over again, with no end point in sight, from the day they are born.

Yes, that really happened.

That girl is the product of terrible parenting, terrible schooling, and the sort of indoctrination that sees her masked every day everywhere like that, as she wants that for you and your children.

Again, this insane high tribe was heard at the UN.

It is neglect of the highest order to look children in the eyes and say we knew how to protect you and we didn't do it.

We have access to a.

Technology to prevent airborne disease, something that millions of our ancestors and millions of people around the world today would kill for, and we refuse to use it, and our shut her to think of where we'll we be in another five years.

So I'm going to get an infection and reinfection.

Yes, let's bring in useless mask mandates for everyone everywhere.

This is clearly a troubled young woman who needs help, psychiatric help.

Most likely what she doesn't need is a microphone and cameras and a platform at the UN.

Just think what sort of parenting has gone into that.

What sort of parents would allow a child to grow up with that sort of hysterical mindset and instead of correcting it, they allow her, no doubt, facilitate her to speak at the UN because I doubt should be given the honor if both mommy and daddy weren't wildly famous, and let's round off our celebrities sharing their stupid opinion portion of the program With Angelina Jolie, She's dazed and confused.

Doesn't even recognize her own country anymore.

Mind you, she had no issue recognizing it when her colleagues like Gina Carano and Roseanne were being silenced and canceled, When her countrymen, including ordinary Mum's fighting work in doctrination, were being persecuted, when the leading presidential candidate was facing unprecedented lawfare, No, none of that troubled Angelina.

But when Jimmy Kimmel had a few days off television for deliberately lying about an assassination, well that had Angelina terrified.

But I don't at this time recognize my country, and I think that's but I am.

I'm I've always lived internationally.

I've always my family's international, my friends, my life, my worldview is equal, united international.

So anything anywhere that divides or of course limits personal expressions and freedoms from anyone, I think is very dangerous.

There you go, hopelessly out of touch, hypocritical and hysterical.

The perfect celebrity can't wait for her, Many many kids to address the un.

Great stuff for RETA.

We'll joining us now as president of the Pastoralists and Graziest Association of West Australia.

Tony Seabrook.

Always great to see Tony here on Outsiders.

Now we see you on Outsiders.

We don't see you as much on the ABC, apparently, Tony.

No.

One of the arguments.

One of the arguments put forward by those who don't want to abolish the ABC, I think it should be put on a subscription model tomorrow is the argument about, oh, well, they do these wonderful rural services, so they look after the communities in the outback where the private sector may not be.

This is patently nonsense.

In your case, tell us about your current situation.

It seems that the ABC in your neck of the words aren't particularly interested in hearing from the head of the pastor Us and Graziers.

No, they're not like the rest of the ABC.

They play the cards the way they see they should be played.

A lot of stories don't get told.

There's emphasis on things of the left, there's emphasis on things green, there's massive emphasis on things aboriginal.

Very rarely.

The people that hold the views I hold have an opportunity to say what we say.

My personal view is just defunded.

Just pull the money away.

I know two serious people that have been on the board that haven't changed it.

Defund it, as you said, make it by subscription.

There are certain elements we need about weather forecasting and those things that are very important to us.

There's got to be a different way of doing it.

But they've got a product that doesn't sell.

We're spending a billion dollars a year propping that organization up.

We don't need the government to pay for entertainment for the ordinary people.

Just defund it and let's put something in place.

It's actually less biased and more useful.

James and tell us of the EB, See, Tony, what have they been doing in terms of the way they've been reporting climate issues and weather issues?

Because every time I turn it on, whatever is happening this day in the weather seems to be proof that there's some climate cataskary coming.

The latest ones that we were supposed to have this sort of you know, cold, wet, miserable summer, and then there was some weather phenomenon I saw that said, oh no, no, no, certainly everything's all hot and dry, and that's unprecedented for the summer.

Tony tell us about the ABC and how they are mismanaging these really important issues because I know, you know, for us it's just whether we go to the beach, but for you guys, it's whether you know you plant, or you crop, or you harvest or what you do.

The way are going to grow an almost and maybe even a record crop this year in Wi.

We're getting better at it.

We're handling the seasons as it unfolds.

I actually had an attempt to get myself on the ABC three or four days ago.

One of the greatest undeveloped tracks of land in West Australia is the Kimberley.

There's cotton country out there that, on told is the best in the Australia.

The Labor Party has a policy that they will not allow any dams on the River, the Fitzroy River or the Market River or any of its tributaries, which denies any opportunity of opening up this country.

I wanted to have that discussion.

No, it doesn't quite fit with the agenda.

And there's so much stuff that the ABC not reporting on, stuff that would be balanced to them and bring an audience back because I think the audience is falling away.

Well, we've got the ABC that are beneficiaries of over a billion, well over a billion a year.

But we've also got SBS, which who sort of fly under the radar, also beneficiary of hundreds of millions every year.

Do they service the rural community at all?

Do they give you the opportunity to put the views of what I would imagine would be the majority of people in regional Australia.

No, SBS is vague and but just not there.

And you were touching on the voice a little while ago.

And this is the greatest crime being committed against Australians, especially Indigenous Australians, of all time.

They are so wrapped up in promoting all things Garma and Marcia Langden and Thomas Mayo, a whole bunch of people are at the left that voice referendum got lost, and then they're behaving as though darn thing was one.

And what I see is absolutely twenty three thousand children I'm told are in care right now.

Where's that story?

Where about the twenty parameters that are supposed to determine the future of digitus Australians.

I think four out of twenty are going in the right direction.

The ABC should be coined for a rule commissioned inquiry into this gravy train that exists today.

All the people on the gravy train that don't seem to give a damn about what's happening out in the bush that they're just so concerned about pushing their own agenda.

And the ABC is up there next to it.

So Tony, tell me back to the Kimberley.

So you're saying, you know, for years we've all known that there's so much potential up there in the Kimberley.

If we could be the bread basket of Asia, the fruit ball of Asia used to be the kind of goal that we had.

And why won't for example, won't they build dams?

Is it green tape?

Is it a climate change thing?

Is it black tape?

Is it a Native title thing?

Is it's why can't you build the dam in the Kimberlee?

Indigenous, cultural and heritage three words that kill anything.

We all saw the floods up there three years ago, taught the place to pieces.

The water that comes down that river system is staggering, and there are communities of Indigenous people up there, little kids growing up with no future whatsoever.

And I've confronted a number of state parlimentarians and simply said, you need to do something because none of us, the rest of us, can do it.

You need jobs up there.

The jobs will be in agriculture.

And that river it forks at Fitzroy, crossing into the Margaret and the Fitzroy.

There are two gorges upstream, Margaret Gorge and Diamond Gorge, the other fabulous places.

No talk about damning them, but I'm told there are fabulous dam sites further up that river system that could be damned and the water could be used to generate a certain amount of hydroactivity.

But the Fitzroy could run fresh water all year round as the order currently does as it bleeds out of the goddamn.

And look, if it wasn't for the fact that that happened a long time ago, I don't believe the goddamn could have been built today under all this clap trap about Indigenous culture and heritage, and we wouldn't have a cotton industry up and in Kunarre Lot we currently do.

You know?

They are so embedded in the past, and it's almost as those to their benefit told indigenous people down because that then gives them a reason to exist and that is just so wrong.

And you're right, the vast amount of water that cuts through up there is phenomenal you could have in You could have jobs building the dams first of all for Indigenous communities, then the agriculture which would come after it, then the businesses that would come, then the growth in those areas wonderful part of the world.

It's a disgrace that you're not even allowed to discuss it and put forward these ideas on the ABC.

That's the point.

Yeah, that's the point.

We're not ab to even talk about it.

And then you furiates me.

Well, it's an absolute you know, it's a disgrace for Australia and so not doing our indigenous communities any good at all, James.

Oh I was going to say, just to the issue of Indigenous communities, where are things with the Native title constpiracy in WA because the last time we've spoke about this last year, that had been I think knocked on the head.

But I've heard that there are different ways that this is coming back into the four again.

Tony.

It's like the ACA and the Voice, they have not let it go.

They quietly snibbling away in the shadows in the darkness, trying to regulate more and more of our country.

Now, just enterprise, what a wonderful lady.

When the ABC had the chance to put us blitz in, the unrelentingly reported on what she said about Indian migrants, which I have no problem with, but just has a very clear view on what the future must be.

And she's been completely fenced out of this because her agenda is not the agenda of the indigenous people.

On the gravy train.

How can it be when she says all the strangers should be equal all of this, How can it be there are large truck tracks of Australia that ordinary Australians can't go.

We're not allowed to go there.

How can it be that this country is tied up in such a way that this percentage of rep population about one minute out of twenty seven and a half million people.

This is a very tiny tail and it's wagging the hell out of a big dog and it's not helping.

It's doing them more harm than enough.

And if someone brands me as a racist for saying what I'm saying, no, I'm not like care more than they care, because I'd like to see some changes occur that might make a difference.

And at the moment, these communities out there, kids out in the bush, no educational future, our gool fiedal syndrome.

Children being born even today have mothers that have been drinking.

This is reprehensible and ministers should be held to account and the ABC just will not do it.

Chinese severok Awy is great to chat to you there in Wa, and that's tennes Seabrook of course from the pastor Lists and Grazies Association.

They do great their work there outs in Wa.

And it's so right about those in power in this country pretending like the referendum never happened, like oh, they won the referendum, never mind that sixty percent voted.

Know every voted no.

In Victoria, we are being saddled with a treaty.

We didn't want a treaty, we didn't want the voice.

Victorian's voted no against the voice.

Now we're getting a state based voice and treaty and it is going to impact every bit of decision making.

It was exactly as we feared it would be on the national level.

The scope of it and if it's happening in Victoria.

If you've got a labor government in your state, it will be coming to you shortly too.

We've got a labor government on the over the entire country under the Queensland and sorry no federally, I don't think we The alban Easy government and Wong and that lot have given up on the voice.

They're going to they will do everything they can.

We're going to talk about digital idea as well.

We're going to take a short break back in ittic.

Yes, the mission's impossible, and it is our mission and we certainly do choose to accept it.

To point out the absurdity, the cost and then the downright danger of the entire net zero push fast article in the Australian Financial Review a couple of days ago by Sam Irvin and others, and I'll just tell you the headline.

If we want to carry on that mission impossible theme, how perfect does this is your Chinese ev a ticking time bomb?

And the article which goes into a great deal of detail and it's well well worth reading, but it's basically pointing out how in order to embrace the madness of net zero, this entire push by Chris Bow and you hear them all the time.

Batteries, batteries, more batteries, batteries in your home.

We'll give you ten thousand dollars a stick a battery in your home, an EV that you'll drive.

Batteries.

You see them all over the place now, popping up in councils.

Well, these batteries are very very dangerous, very unsafe.

And when they catch on fire and they go, they really go.

A mate of mine I heard the other day one of his lithium batteries had basically burnt down his house.

So there's a real danger here.

The fact of the matter is they are explosive if if the software male functions, or as this article says James, the software can be manipulated by the Chinese at the Communist Party at some point that of course they wouldn't.

And yet, were they to manipulate the software that's already in there, already in every EV, already in every home that's got batteries in Australia, already in all those vehicles, battery stations orders, were the Chinese to choose to do so, they could ignite them.

They could add devastation.

And that's what the article in the Financial Review is saying obviously I'm paraphrasing James.

Well, you know it's not just the AFI.

There was also a really good piece of The Australia on Saturday all about this about EV's the same danger, but it gets down to this much bigger issue.

Our entire energy infrastructure.

As part of this transition, we're outsourcing it to China.

Now, you remember a decade ago when we decided quite wisely not to let Huawei the Chinese, build our five G network.

Instead, we said, but as a consolation prize, you could put solar panels all over the country.

You can give all of us really cheap cars that you're over supplying here to the market.

But you know, you get some benefit down the track, because every intelligence assessment says these things have many cases kill switches.

So there is possibility not just you know, to blow up cars or do things to that or you know, make them stop runn which is probably the most likely thing, but also to shut down large parts of the electricity grid.

There was an incident in.

The US where part of a solar array was shut down remotely from China.

This should have made headlines around the globe.

This is the risk that Chris Bowen and Anthony Albinizi, who talked so eloquently about doing things for Australian sovereignty and the Australian Way and all of this.

You know, they're outsourcing our entire energy grid to the Chinese Communist Party.

Remember, every single corporation in China, every single state owned corporation, acts as an agent of the CCP.

This is not being xenophobic.

This is the law in China, the national security law, and should push come to shove, they have this huge range of tactics.

It's called gray zone warfare.

So it's not shooting missiles into cities, it's not blowing up ships.

It's simply crippling the ability for the country to function, at which point all bets are off.

Well, we're talking about a national security risk here.

We're talking about a regime that is hostile, that is aggressive, that has long term plans of expansion.

We know all this.

We spend billions on defense to prepare for this, and yet we give them control of our energy supply and greed.

It is absolutely suicideally stupid, and we need to come to terms with what we're facing.

This is the Chinese Communist Party and We've also got this shyness now from calling out this from both sides of politics, because they know we have what close to a million Chinese aligned not I shouldn't say aligned, Chinese born Australians who now participate in our elections, and they know that often criticism of the Chinese Communist Party is misconstrued as criticism of all Chinese people, which is not what it is.

We're talking about the regime, not the population.

And so now there's this shyness to actually tackle these issues and talk about it because they don't want to backlash from that large contingent of voters.

So it's a tricky situation we've got ourselves in at the moment.

And we saw how hyper sensitive everyone was around just Enterprise making a very mild comment I would have thought about the Indian population in Indian migrants.

It wasn't really even any criticism of that group.

It was just pointing out what a labor polster had said that they overwhelmingly vote labor or have done recently, and we saw the hysteria and hypersensitivity there.

So are we not ever going to have any honest conversations in this country?

What it can let me just read it.

You mentioned the article in the Australian as well, so one in the Financial Review, one in the Australian.

I'll just read from the Australian.

One.

Outraged readers swore to me and at me that anyone who bought one is talking about one of these batteries or evs, was a dangerous idiot, that these were wheeled weapons of war, and that the Chinese government was laughing maniacally at us while plotting our downfall.

Now, obviously that's that writer's opinion, and it's it sounds like a kind of scary dystopian novel or a you know, adjacent Bohr novel of the future.

But it is a national security risk, and we have bowen pushing these things on people, bribing people to put these things in their homes with ten thousand dollars at the same time as destroying our natural resources, our call our gas and so on.

It is a terrifying thing.

And that's the labor government who are quite happy to toddle off and spend six days hanging around with z Jingping.

Let's let's see it.

Well, you know, but it's interesting though, because there's so much to talk about about what we are allowed to talk about.

Talk exactly because just at the moment, don't worry it's going to get worse.

This leads me to another to get really.

Important story here, and I hope everybody saw this, but if not, we've got to talk about this here because the Human Rights Watchdog has decided the Humanist Rights Commission has put a submission in saying that regulation is necessary to stop what it calls misinformation on climate change that is delaying green action.

And among other things, this submission said that they need to the ability to shut down narratives that undermine public trust in the climate narrative and on where I heard a action where we heard this for COVID, where we heard misinformation before the failed attempt to get the misinformation build up.

All of this comes back to what we're talking about in the last segment, This whole idea that you know, there's this mainstream of opinion that we're allowed to talk about, and they want to stop everybody from talking about stuff that's outside this, you know, minority elite opinion on climate.

But James, the Humans Rights Commission was led by someone appointed by the former liberal parties.

And they should be protected again, they should be protecting human rights.

One of the key human rights is of course they were doing morons and.

With that free speech, there are no human rights.

And for this group to suggest this Orwellian measure to basically say facts they don't like are misinformation and they're going to frustrate the.

Between two, it's really dangerous.

And just wait till they get a digital ID.

Then they won't have to need legislation.

They'll just turn you off at the flick of a switch.

After the break.

More to say about Benjamin Etnaho's speech at the U and John Heinderaker here on Outsiders.

Can It Tick?

Hello?

You're watching Outsiders with Rita Panahee, with James Morrow and myself Ruin Dean.

Donald Trump's speech at the United Nations began with what may have been some form of childish sabotage from the woke idiots running that useless organization.

The escalated jammed the moment he stepped on and his teleprompter didn't work.

The sound within the room was apparently woeful, and Millennia, who was in the audience, confessed she hadn't actually heard a word of it.

Trump has now called for the sabotage to be investigated as he should.

But at the end of the day it made no difference.

Donald Trump spoke from the heart and didn't miss a beat or miss a trick talk about truth bonds.

He dropped the full payload, from climate change as a hoax, to immigration as killing nations around the world, to the brazen stupidity and duplicity of Australia and others recognizing Palestine.

It was a magnificent speech.

On Friday was benjaminettnya Who's turn to speak?

And of course the childish behavior of the UN continued with heckling and a walkout by delegates.

Why we fund this obnoxious and largely pointless and dangerous institution is beyond me.

But anyway, when Prime Ministernet now who spoke, He didn't mince his words.

First up, he addressed his astonishing military successes of the last twelve months.

Half the Houti leadership in Yemen gone, Yukasin war in Gaza gone, nas Sorry, Hassan Asraela in Lebanon gone, the Acid regime in Syria gone, those missiles, those militias in Iraq, well, they're still deterred and their leaders if they attack, is rule will also be gone.

And for Iran's top military commanders and his stop atomic bomb scientist, well they're gone.

To President Trump and I promised to prevent Iran from developing nuclear wea weapens, and we delivered on that promise.

Next, Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to finish the job.

The final remnants of Ramas are holed up in Gaza City.

They vow to repeat the atrocities of October seventh, again and again and again, no matter how diminish their forces.

That is why Israel must finish the job.

That is why we want to do so as fast as possible.

And the Prime Minister then had two powerful messages, first directly to the hostages themselves and secondly to those who are holding them in horrific and barbaric conditions.

We will not falter and we will not rest until we bring all of you home.

So to the remaining Ramas leaders and to the jailers of our hostages, I now say, lay down your arms.

Let my people go.

Free the hostages, all of them, the whole forty eight.

Free the hostages now.

And it wouldn't be an ettennaho u n speech without a few props and a bit of black humor, and the Prime Minister didn't disappoint.

And of course you understand that the war in Gaza has affected every Israeli.

But I'm sure there are people in New York, or in London, or in Melbourne and elsewhere who are probably thinking, what does all of this have to do with me?

And the answer is everything, because our enemies are your enemies.

So let's do something else.

The first of the un let's do a pop quiz and raise your hand if you know the answer.

Here's the first question, who shouts death to America?

Is it a Iran, b Commas see Kris Bala, d the Hooties or e.

All of the above?

All of the above, correct, all of the above.

Second question, who has murdered Americans and Europeans in cold blood?

Is it a Al Qaeda b Comas?

See Kibala, d Iran or e.

All of the above.

It's correct again.

So here's the point.

I wanted to make our enemies hate all of us with equal venom.

They want to drag the modern world back to the past, to a dark age of violence, fanaticism and terror.

Indeed, that is their goal.

Nataia, who then talked about the importance of Israel's war against these forces of darkness, and how Israel's merely the frontline in our, yours and mine battle for Western Enlightenment beliefs, values, and traditions.

Behind closed doors, many of the leaders who publicly condemn us privately thank us.

They tell me how much they value Israel's superb intelligence services that have prevented time and again terrorist attacks in their capitals, time and again, saving countless lives.

This is precisely what Israel is doing in Gaza.

We're wiping out the terror regime of Ramas and ensuring that this savagery will never threaten Israel again.

That's what we're doing.

That's what any self respecting government would do.

But there was no disguising the disgust that Benjaminette and Yahoo rightly fields for all those countries, including shamefully hours under the appalling Albanesi Wong government, countries such as Australia that have pandered to the Muslim vote, shown zero leadership in combating rampant anti Semitism, and then in every national forum, including the United Nations, have sided against our once firm friend and ally, Israel, and instead constantly accused Israel of all sorts of iniquities, including, of course, allowing the accusation of genocide to go unchallenged.

Yet, and it's so yet that I'm I'm sorry to say here.

Yet over time, many world leaders buckled.

They buckled under the pressure of a bias media, radical Islamist constituencies, and antisemitic mobs.

For much of the past two years, Israel has had to fight a seven front war against barbarism, with many of your nations opposing us.

I say to the representatives of those nations, this is not an indictment of Israel.

It's an indictment of you.

It's an indictment of wek need leaders who appease evil rather than support a nation whose brave soldiers guard you from the barbarians at the gate.

They're already penetrating your gates.

When will you learn you can't appease your way out of jihad and you won't escape this will as storm by sacrificing Israel To overcome that storm.

You have to stand with Israel.

But that's not what you're doing.

Israel is accused of deliberately targeting civilians, ladies, and gentlemen.

The opposite is true.

The head of the head of Urban Warfare Studies, Colonel John Spencer, He's perhaps the world's greatest expert on urban warfare.

He says Israel is applying more measures to minimize civilian casualties than any military and history.

Indeed, as Bernard Henri Levy, you might remember we had him on the show a few years ago, wrote this week in the Wall Street Journal, and I'm quoting him.

A genocidal armory.

Army does not take two years to win a war in a territory the size of Las Vegas.

A genocidal army does not send SMS warnings before firing or facilitating the passage of those trying to escape the strikes.

A genocidal army wouldn't evacuate every month hundreds of Palestinian children suffering from rare diseases or cancer, sending them to hospitals in Abu Dhabi as part of a medical airlift set up right after October seventh.

To speak of genocide in Gaza as an offense to common sense, a maneuver to demonize Israel and then insult to the victims of genocidees past and present.

That was anri Levy and the Wall Street Journey Journal this week.

But finally back to Albanesi Wog and the disgraceful actions of the Australian government this week in the United Nations.

Don't forget under the terms of the Oslo Accords which this labor government pretends to support, a Palestinian state can only ever be recognized after all the preconditions have been fulfilled to the happiness of both sides.

Yet the hypocrites and charlatans of Alboso's government bang on endlessly about the rules based international order that are quite happy to ignore those same international laws when it suits their undergraduate socialist fantasies.

Now under Prime Minister Netnya, who saved his ire and his.

Disgust for them, this week, the leaders of France, Britain, Australia, Canada and other countries unconditionally recognized a Palestinian states.

You know what message the leaders who recognize the Palestinian state this week sent to the Palestinians.

It's a very clear message murdering Jews pays off.

Well.

I have a message for these leaders.

When the most savage terrorists on earth are effusively praising your decision You didn't do something right.

You did something wrong, horribly wrong.

Your disgraceful decision will encourage terrorism against Jews and against innocent people everywhere.

It will be a mark of shame on all of you.

But wait a minute, mister Prime Minister.

They tell me, wait a minute.

We believe in a two state solution where the Jewish State of Israel will live side by side in peace with the Palestinian state.

There's only one problem with that.

The Palestine is they don't believe in the solution.

They never have.

They don't want a state next to Israel.

They want a Palestinian state instead of Israel.

Absolutely, the alban Easy government has brought shame and humiliation onto this nation.

House is not a national government, it's a national disgrace.

Joining US NOW Center for the American Experiment, President John Heinderraker, John, great to see you, has always thanks for staying up or being there on a SATELLAYAVO for US NOW.

Lots to talk about, but just quickly, first of all, what did you make of the United Nations week Trump's speech and all the carry on.

Well, I think they made a mistake in sabotaging his teleprometer.

If they hadn't done that.

He would have given a prepared speech.

As it was, they had to listen to him kind of free associate for an hour and tell them what he really thought it.

Was.

There was a massive own goal from the Escalator Malado guys when they were dumb enough to talk about doing that a week earlier.

That's the London Times published it.

But I want to ask you about some of these cases we're seeing.

There's reports now that the Department of Justice is going to be probing George Soros for funding these violent groups and it's going to do an investigation to see if there could be any charges forthcoming.

How do you see this, because that man's influence on America has been considerable and terrible.

In my opinion, media it's been horrific.

And I think what we're mostly talking about here is a group called Antifa.

They have chapters all around the country.

They have a chapter where I live here in Minnesota, and Antifa rioted a hundred nights in a row in Portland, Oregon.

They turn out these these vicious rioters, these criminals, night after night.

And when you talk to liberals about that, you complain about Antifa, they know they beat people up, they set things on fire, They're horrible.

The party line of the Democratic Party as well, Antifa isn't really an organization, It's really just an idea.

Well, I can't turn out, right, there's night after night after night somebody organizes that, somebody pays for it, and I say, this investigation is long overdue.

Let's find out who is funding this violence all across the United States.

James, Well, yeah, I mean they can say Antifa is just an idea like they once claim.

No, the mafia is just an idea and not an organization, and they crack down on that, that's for sure.

But breaking news here.

Trump has just ordered apparently the full force of the military into what he called war ravaged Portland.

Now he says that ICE facilities has been under attack.

We saw that horrific attack in Dallas the other day.

We keep seeing My media is just full of footage of ICE vehicles being surrounded, Ice officers being attacked, facilities being attacked, facilities under siege.

If these cities and states where this is happening, don't go along with this, this seems to lead to a real sort of well, you know, it almost sounds like the Democrats might be having an, I don't know, in an insurrection, John, And I know we're not supposed to say that about the Democrats, but that's what it feels like.

Well, I think that's the name of the law, isn't it.

The Insurrection Act?

Precisely, this is.

A complicated subject.

The circumstances under what your president can send military force inside the United States are narrowly circumscribed, and so you have the posse Commentatus Act, which says normally he can't do it, but there are exceptions, and then you have the Insurrection Act that authorizes in to do it in certain circumstances.

I think Trump's strongest case for using federal forces to preserve order is when federal employees and federal installations, federal buildings, and so on are under attack.

And that is clearly the case with regard to ice across the country, and it's clearly the case with regard to ice in Portland.

And so I think Trump has a strong case to send military forces to bring order and to protect these federal employees who are just trying to do their jobs.

Now, John, we have a segment on this show sometimes we call instant karma, which is where we see some crazy character has done something, rather than a moment later it catches up with them.

This is a case of delayed karma where remember all that during BLM, all those people taking the knee to BLM, including amongst them with some FBI agents.

Well it now turns out the FBI has now decided to fire those agents who are photographed during the protests in Washington that followed the twenty twenty death of George Floyd.

So it took a while, but there they are kneeling at this kind of That was a weird period, John, all that kneeling stuff.

But they've now been sacked, not before time, I would have thought, John.

Rowan, some people may wonder, you know, why exactly should they be fired for participating in these George Floyd demonstrations back in twenty twenty, And the answer is that the entire point of those protests was to claim that American law enforcement is racist.

That was the entire idea.

In fact, George Floyd was a career criminal who had a three times lethal dose of fentanyl in his system when he died.

Race had nothing to do, nothing to do with that incident.

It is reasonable to expect that FBI agents are going to be pro law enforcement, not anti law enforcement.

Had not signed on to this myth that American law enforcement is this terrible racist institution, and that's what they were doing by kneeling and participating in those proteas.

And meanwhile, we've got Kamala Harris, who was, let's not forget raising bail money for some of these lawless thugs who were writing back in twenty twenty.

She's on a.

Book tour, John, and she is just saying the most insane thing.

She's calling Donald Trump at communist dictator and emperor.

And she's claiming, without being challenged, that her election that she participated in was the closest in the twenty first century, that she came within a whisker of winning.

Can you just fact check for that for us, please, because none of the people she has sat down with, from Rachel Madda to the ladies of the View, corrected her when she said this.

Well, Kamala Harris lives in her own world, you know, she really does, and sometimes she has kind of a hard time explaining that world.

No, it was not the closest the election in the twenty first century or any other century you know, I think the good news here, Rita is Kamala Harris is not fooling anyone.

I mean, I mean, she and Joe Biden are both people that the Democratic Party just wants to hustle off.

The stage.

Race was an embarrassment, frankly, her tenure as vice president was an embarrassment.

And the whole scandal of Joe Biden, who was nowhere near competent to execute the duties of his office, I think for the whole four year term, you know, and the Democrats just want to leave that entire era behind them, and as far as they're concerned, Kamala Harris's book tour cannot end soon enough.

Hey, John, just foro let you go.

I want to ask you about this other story, which is fascinating to me because you know much to point sure how to feel about it.

But TikTok apparently is going to live to see another day in the United States.

Apparently China has signed a deal with the Trump administration.

There's going to be a consortium of buyers I think coming in on this.

Americans will be able to use it, but it sounds like China won't have as much sort of control over the algorithm or the information that they harvest tell us about this, is this a good deal, This is a.

Good news story, James, TikTok goes.

American Congress passed a law that would shut TikTok down in the United States unless it was transferred to non Chinese ownership, and there were good reasons for that.

The algorithm was promoting anti American content or national security concerns about the data collection that was going on.

And what Trump's executive order did was to certify that the deal that is now being done complies with the law that Congress passed.

And what's happening is that there's going to be an American version of TikTok available here, which is going to be a majority owned by American companies, including Oracle.

It's going to be headquartered in the United States.

And I think this is a great result.

Young people like TikTok, and they're going to be able to continue having access to TikTok, but without that pernicious influence of the Chinese Communist Party.

John Heindereca always so good to chat to you, Thanks so much more.

Chats again soon after the break.

James truth boond and I go away back in a tick.

Hello, you're watching Outsiders with your hosts throwing District Attorney Dean and rita political prosecution panahe And of course I'm your unindicted co conspirator, James Morrow.

Now I want to get into the unhinged backlash to the indictment of former FBI director James Comy in just a minute, but first we got to have a little fun and a reminder of the bullet the United States and the world dodged when Kamala Harris's presidential ambitions were finally to rest last November.

Yes, that's right, Kamala Harris is out promoting her new book, and well she has some thoughts about babies.

It would happen, is invariably somebody would want me to take a picture of a hugbear child and someone in the back would hand that baby.

Over through the crowd to you people who would past the baby, and then past the baby, be past the baby.

And I don't know there was something about that when it would happen.

I mean, I could get very aotional about it right now, but but you know, I believe that we should always feel that, you know, the children of the community are the children of the community.

Ah, yes, babies, Well, you know we missed out.

We missed out rowan and rated, we missed out on having that.

As the President of the United States said, here's a little truth bomb for you this week as you get ready for an onslaught of mainstream media coverage.

Zone now of the big story of this week and this weekend claiming that Donald Trump is abusing his power and using the Department of Justice for his own needs and his own political ends over the indictment of John James Kobe.

Sorry, all because of this indictment handed down at the end of last week against this man, as I say, former FBI Director James Kobey.

Well, guess what.

Here's the truth bomb about everybody complaining they're all a bunch of hypocrites, because Kobe now stands accused of misleading Congress over this testimony he gave way back in twenty seventeen about whether or not he leaked or authorized leaks of classified information to the press to advance the Russia Gate conspiracy hoax against Donald Trump, thus undermining his first term as president.

Director comy, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation.

Never question two one relatively related.

Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?

No, but that testimony was later disputed by Comy's former deputy director at the FBI and McCabe, who said that he was told to leak information to advance the anti Trump Russia Russia Russia Spira Sea.

Coby was then asked about this again.

This is where things get interesting in twenty twenty, and it is this testimony which seems to have gotted him into trouble with the Trump administration.

Now, as you know, mister mccab who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it.

Now, what McCabe is saying and what you testify to this committee cannot both be true.

One or the other is false.

Who's telling the truth.

I can only speak to my testimony.

I stand by what the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of twenty seventeen.

So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak.

And mister mccab if he says contrary is not telling the truth.

Is that correct?

Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today.

Huh.

Well, they cannot both be right.

They cannot both be telling the truth.

Now.

I don't want to get into the merits of the case, though there is a lot of evidence that McCabe's version of the truth is correct, because we do know that there was a general rush to stitch Trump up for being involved in Russian collusion, and that the press was a willing or unwilling accomplice, witting or unwitting accomplice through FBI Director James Comy and an operation known as Crossfire Hurricane.

And we also know that this effort went all the way to the top of the Obama administration, which was outgoing, with the then President Obama implicated in helping to engineer the hoax against his incoming successor Donald Trump.

There's more, too, because we also know that, among others, longtime Comy friend and Columbia University professor Dan Redman given, according to his testimony, access to highly classified, top secret information, and that he the professor was used as a conduit to provide this information to the New York Times were fair bit of evidence centrement.

As I say, the rights and wrongs are for now for the course to decide, and against all this call me is claiming he's the innocent one.

My heart is broken for the Department of Justice.

But I have great confidence in the federal judicial system and I'm innocent.

So let's have a trial and keep the faith.

Well, okay, you say that's your story there, mister Colby.

But what about the hypocrisy of those who cheered on the nakedly political and coordinated prosecution of Donald Trump through the court's last year on charges raging on everything from election subversion to this was my favorite, taking out loans and then paying them back.

Chuck Schumer was one of countless Democrats who who was on Friday all over the Kobe indictment saying Trump has corrupted and weaponized the Justice Department to go after his enemies and help his friends.

But it's interesting if we go back in the way back machine.

When Trump was convicted of the incredibly rare charge of bookkeeping fraud, Schumert cheered, saying, no one is above the law, except maybe, of course, James Kobe.

Now here's MSNBC's Kendalanian.

That is a watershed.

That is a line that we have crossed now in this country.

And Republicans are going to say, Jen, We'll wait a second.

Didn't the Biden administration do that?

Didn't the FBI go after Donald Trump?

That was completely different, That had no resemblance to what happened here with James Coby.

Yes, completely different, because well, there's that great legal doctrine we all know so well from the show Orange Man Bad, and of course in the great pantheon of tweets that didn't age.

Well, this is a banger.

James commy himself in twenty twenty three when Trump was indicted, quote, a good day for the rule of law.

Anyway, one more.

Why not?

Here's former lead prosecutor in the failed Robert Muher investigation, Andrew Weissman.

First when Trump was indicted, then after James call me me was tell me, dear viewer, if you can spot the difference.

He is being treated no better or worse than anyone else.

This is not selective prosecution.

That this is not somebody who singled out that he is being treated just like anyone else.

That is what it means to have a rule of law.

This is such a horrendous moment for the rule of law, for the Apartment of Justice, for the country.

We're at large being singled out for impermissible reasons and so just because you did your job, but just because you referred the president or you opened an investigation into the president.

Now I could do these all day, at least for the rest of the hour, but you can see what is happening here.

And it's not just in the US where this is happening.

Selective prosecution of any so called populist who cuts against the globalist line on mass migration and the dissolution of fundamentally distinct nations, or campaigns against climate change or anything like that these days is a world wide phenomenon.

And this we've seen happen in the last year or so from Fransce to Brazil, to Germany and elsewhere.

But the funniest thing here is that the Democrats are now openly ascribing that when it's there, when it's their person in the dock, they'll go back to prosecute Republicans.

And that is up to the right to lay down their arms.

Here's a little bit, just to round this off of Senator Richard Blumenthal a little while ago.

The old saying what comes around goes around.

You know, today it's a Republican president.

But I think it's time for Republican colleague to say enough is enough, and we're going to push them and.

Do it hard.

Look, we all want to see justice be impartial, no one more than me.

But if the change from Democrats, if the charge of Democrats is somehow that the Komi prosecution is political, but all those prosecutions against Trump were not, well, I'm really sorry about that.

But there's another old saying that comes to mind, and it ends with the words pants on fire.

Thanks James Well, I promise we'd speak about digital idea.

This is actually terrifying what is happening in Britain and it is going to come here.

The thing to remember here is we have in starting in December, this under sixteen YouTube thing.

Albanezi has been boasting about it around the world, how great it is.

He's speaking at a Labour conference in Britain.

Here is Keir Starmer bringing in the British version of the digital ID and listen very carefully you're not going to be able to start a new job with arsets.

It's going to be as orwellian as the threats have always been.

Now this will be coming here because there's no way of introducing that has been explained to us yet this under sixteen band without a digital idea.

They haven't said they're bringing one in yet, but that's the only way to do it.

If they are going to stick to this band thing, we will see.

But have a listen to Keir Starmer.

This this is sickening stuff, followed by Albo in Australia and accord Yonas in Norway just a few weeks ago.

So in fact, pitted against our right wing opponents, i'd say said to left parties are having quite a year so far, and that is why today I am announcing this government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory for the right to work by the end of this parliament.

Let me spell that out.

You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.

Oh, welcome to nineteen eighty four.

There is big Brother nineteen eighty four right in front of you.

Unashamedly.

Notice how he linked elbow into that little thing, and notice how it was about right wing because of our successors.

Let Labour's success Keir Starmer, Albanezi, Mark Carney.

Because of Labour successes, they intend to attack their pedolitical opponents by introducing a digital ID.

He made that link, not me.

Now there you have it.

If that doesn't terrify, I don't know what we'll reach.

No, and as always there is a lot of misdirection.

There's a lot of efforts to dress this up as I was just going to be tackling illegal immigration and make making sure everyone who's working is entitled to work in the UK.

No, they're already measures that are in place that do that.

This is purely an empty reason given to bring this in and we've known that's something they've wanted to institute for decades here.

There's always been great opposition to it.

But I do fear after what we saw in COVID and just how compliant so many people were with the most outrageous demands, that that opposition is diminishing and people need to wake up.

You cannot be apathetic in this day and age.

You might not be that interested in politics, but politics is interested in you, and you'd better start taking notice of what's happening.

But one one's chains about this word mandatory, you said, Manda Tree.

Katie Gallagher has told us in the past on all right, digital idea or things like that won't be mandatory.

No no, no, no, no no, But there it was spelled out in black and white.

Mandatory.

That's what labor in Britain wants.

Well, last time we heard mandatory, it was COVID and that led to all sorts of disasters.

This will be a thousand times worse jack.

And this is putting in the fence posts for a new totalitarian style Chinese social credit scheme.

And I want to sound alarmist about this, but this is where this goes.

Because once you start to link all of this, they link your right to work.

Then you're right to have a bank account, your right to transact, your right to do business.

You're right to buy a car, register a vehicle, get a driver's license, get healthcare, do all sorts of things will all be tied into this.

And what it will also be tied into it, well we know for what they're trying to do with the digital ID for Internet here is it will tie your internet usage to it and It is no coincidence, guys, that great Britain where thousands of people every year get an on the door because they tweeted something that somebody didn't like, whether it was about migration or transgenderism.

Yes, today an anti Hamaska.

Anti Oscar.

You know this happens every single day, hundreds of times a day.

You know in the UK where you can't walk down the street in London holding your telephone without somebody yoinking it out of your hand and sending it to Albania.

Well, it's true.

I mean I did to ask anybody in London.

But this is the whole thing.

It is about putting controls on what you can say, think and do because they know that they're losing control, and they know they see the polls, they see how reform has run away with it.

And one of the big waves reform has run away with it is because people are able to share raw footage of events and footage and there's no longer those gatekeepers that were stopping these sorts of inconvenient things from getting out there.

Well about the I all the nonce we heard about Jimmy Kimmel and his first speech.

We learned this week what We've suspected all along that the Biden administration put pressure on YouTube to silence the deplatform just a lot of people who were challenging their narratives, and this sort of this sort of impingement on free speech.

If it can happen in America, where they have the First Amendment, just imagine what they can get away with here and they happen.

Safety Commissioner E Karen as we call us, boasted of the fact.

She said, Oh, they don't have the First Amendments in Australia, so I can pretty much share, you know, head off one with my plan.

But let me just before you do that, we'll get back to you.

One and a half million people James have already signed a petition against this in Britain.

The public are waking up in Britain.

Wake up Australia, Wake up Australia.

This stuff is really serious and it's coming.

So the important it's okay because the important thing though, because just because you mentioned the US at the First Amendment, you know, and this is something that I've spoken about every time we've spoken about the E Safety Commissioner, this is the effort here in Australia, in continental Europe, you have something called the Digital Services Act, which EU nations are putting in place to monitor and control what people are allowed to say online.

In the UK, you're going to have all of this sort of thing which sounds like it's to be a supercharged version of what we have.

The point of all of these things here because all these social media companies are based in the US, where they have First Amendment protection, and this means that all of these other regimes are trying to undermine and undercut the First Amendment protections that their citizens get by transacting and posting and reading on these platforms.

That's what's really sinister about this.

That's what everybody has to understand.

The E Safety Commissioner is not about protecting your kids from bullying.

It is about protecting regimes from people hearing things they don't want them to hear.

And they belt the cat there.

Kirs Stamer said it.

You won't be able to work in Britain without a digital ID.

So that's the stick, that's the gun they're holding to their head in Britain.

So don't think this is some nice little thing about stopping kids watching porn or whatever.

It is.

No, no, no, this is control, and they've made it very clear.

This is the World Economic Forum, this is Klaus Schrab, this is the Great Reset.

It's all happening now in front of us, and they're not mucking around, so we mustn't muck around either, because once that digital ID framework is in place, they've got you forever.

They've got your carbon footprints, they've got what you spend each week when you eat meat.

Bang, they can turn it off.

It controls everything.

Be warned, Australia be very very afraid after the break wally of the week, and I think I've got one in mind already in a tick.

Yes, it's time and that difficult choice which was the wally of the week, Rita's got an old favorite.

Oh yes.

Well if you're wondering how low will the Australian left go, well here's your answer.

Here is Clementine thought, I forgive him.

So there she is mocking the grieving widow of Charlie Kirk, Erica Kirk, who gave that incredible speech at his funeral, forgiving the assassin for taking her husband, the father of her children away, And that apparently is the subject now of mockery.

From that, I mean, what do you even call that?

I mean it is it's evil, it's demonic, it's it's gross.

I think Wally the Week is too kind rip rip Curl.

You've got the famous Aussie brand here forced to close its stores.

I don't know if this is it.

Here we go some stores are wrecked.

Eighty two million dollar loss being touted by the Daily Mail as go work, go broke, including rip Curl's brilliant ideas in the last couple of years has been to put a transgender woman I in other words, a biological male as their kind of West Surfing thing didn't work for them.

Eighty two millions down the gurglar.

That's rip Curl.

So Walies of the Week there definitely, James, what have you got for it?

Oh?

Well, look I've got a rather more expansive one.

I'd like to nominate pretty much the entirety of the United Nations, right from you know, the various sort of staffers and everybody who was involved with the potentially the debacle around Donald Trump and is teleprofer and his escalader, do all of the diplomats who've proven everything we've said about this being a talking shop for dictators and authoritarians, who walked out during Benjamin Nettnaho's speech before the United Nations condemning Islamist terrorism and Hamas I thought that that was one of the most disc raciful things I have ever seen in my life.

I have been an opponent and I've spoken opponent of the United States Nations, not you know, United Nations for decades now.

It should have no authority.

It should you know, this whole idea that you would give groups like Iran seats on human rights councils and things like that, which is exactly what they do.

It's a nonsense.

And you know, for all of that, for all everybody to act like, well, what happened to Benjamin now who was embarrassing group?

No, I would say, beb Prime minister.

Where that is a badge of honor?

Where that as a badge of honor that so many totalitarians and thugs walked out on you speaking the truth?

Yeah, and you mentioned badge of honor the badge that he had during that editorial I did earlier.

It was actually a QR code that Benjamin Nett Yahoo was wearing.

If you went onto the QR code, it took you the footage of the horrific atrocities of October seventh, the rapes, the murders and all of that nightmare which, of course as well, all this began.

Now I a nominator.

We talked about it before, e Karen Julian, Men Grant, have a listen.

This is a person well shee's it's going to be bringing in you watch, wait and see.

Listen to her trying to soft soap a way around what lies in front of all Australians, this digital idea nonsense.

Have a listen.

Believe that over time facial age estimation, liveness tests and other forms of age assurance will become normalized as well.

Different people at different ages will have different levels of comfort with things like taking selfies or using biometrics or even digital ID.

It really varies.

It is ultra sinister, James, as you were saying, and you know, oh people, there's a level of comfort which means there's a level of discomfort which means a lot of people have been going to be very uncomfortable about this totality area nightmare.

Because she goes on to say it'll just be normalized over time.

This is classic World Economic Forum nudge nudge program.

It's so sick, James.

You know, it's a bit about the biometric stuff.

Yeah, that's really interesting.

They're trying to sell us something really dangerous here, this idea that they're harvesting all our biometric data to go god knows where, you know, because it's a lot easier than just giving out your idea, which they're the government they already have.

So what they're trying to do is attach all of this other information and build up a much deeper, richer biometric database about everybody and then God knows how that will all be, you know, deployed in the future.

I mean, we saw what happened during the pandemic, how everybody needed apps to do different things, to go different places.

Well, a lot of people in government and in bureaucracies we know about this.

We talked about this, really enjoyed that power.

And don't think and that's this stuff, and don't think that this stuff is just about keeping kids from being bullied online, which is a great noble cause, but this ain't it exactly.

And you know, Australians has said this is very very sinis to stuff they're going to have.

They're pushing us towards biometric digital ideas of pushing us towards the entire World Economic Forum agenda.

So in Mangrand has to be.

I can't stomach even mentioning Clementine before it.

Again.

She doesn't qualify because, as you said, she's far, far worse than a while the other week in my opinion.

But do you well, yeah, perhaps we need a new category.

But I don't know how many competitors there would be if you are sinking that low.

Exactly, we go lower, we go even lower of the week, James.

You know, I love the un one, but I think that even grand thing, I've kind of got to give it.

It's too scary.

This is happening in Australia.

Wake up Australia after the break.

I am a celebrity, stupid, untic, crazy workworld, the celebrities, rita, let's have some more Kamala.

Well, we can't get enough of Kamala.

Here she is arriving at a university, and I always suspect when I see her these days.

She's been a happy hour.

Closest election for President of the United States in the twenty first century.

Yeah, I know that Howard Grad did that.

Here Howard Grad.

At Howard university, repeating lies that everyone there is too stupid to correct her on.

It was not the closest it definitely.

She lost every swing state, she won the electoral college by enormous margin, and she even lost the popular vote, first time a Republican has won the popular vote in what twenty years, So she's repeating a verifiable lie and those university academics and students.

I don't think it was a happy hour.

I think it was a happy nineteen minutes.

It was definitely well look, I just thought, you know, like, yeah, okay, I take you for that.

They were all sort of backing her and a clapping her in, But I felt like it was like, yeah, you're absolutely right.

Hey, you're uber's here.

Come on, let's get you to the uber.

You know, yeah, time to go.

I did a great plan.

Serena William was mentioned by Rita in her editorial, but she wasn't strictly being so.

Triggered by a cotton plant some display at a five star hotel, but when she was showing folks around her beautiful property back in twenty twenty one, see if you could see any sort of cotton plant imagery here.

Let's just have a look at what we've got there around and that's a cotton I mean it's a donkey.

We're built out of cotton balls and things.

That that was one of her works of art there she is need.

I need a minute just to just to recover from that, because that's very, very confronting imagery.

So suddenly she developed this allergy to cotton pick and I wonder why that was.

There we go, Mark Raufalo is always good for a bit of a celebrity.

Ruffalo rhymes of buffalo.

Thank that's Tom in my giving me the pronunciation.

You have to have that in television, Mark Ruffalo.

There we go Here he is good for a work bit of nonsense seeing what's happening.

First of all, we're understanding that the immigrants aren't the criminals.

If you look at the statistics, most of the.

Crimes that are committed in this country are by white people that non immigrants.

Is he correct, James, Well, I think there's a little phrase called per capita, which I think maybe he needs to sort of learn about.

Monk is not known for his keen intellect, as you can't even put on a cap properly.

He's miracle.

He can dress himself and get out of the house every day, and yet he chooses to open it on political issues daily in putting on it very.

Quickly James, Well, Bruce Springsteen, who has a worth I just looked it up of one point two billion US dollars.

Yes, that great man of the people, man of the left, has now said that he actually thinks of helping to push them this way, that the Democrats are too far for America.

So well done Bruce for finally waking up there.

But he still says Trump is trash, so we take out what you will.

Well, that's it for Outsiders.

Thank you so much for being with us, and thank you so much for everyone who went to Seapac last week.

It was great to see you all during the week.

Don't forget you've got the reader Panahe shows some terrific shows coming up this week.

As always, Friday is the big night.

You know, go out for dinner on a Thursday night or a Saturday night, because Friday night seven o'clock world According to Rundine eight o'clock US Report with James Morrow nine o'clock read a Panna here?

How good is that?

Almost as good as this show?

Outsiders?

Every Sunday morning.

We'll see you next Sunday.

Up now is ross Greenwood with business weekends.

Enjoy