Hey guys.

Before we get into the episode, a quick note.

We're looking for news stories of betrayal for our weekly Betrayal series, which returns in August.

If you've experienced betrayal and feel ready to share your story, now is a great time to reach out.

Email us at Betrayal Pod at gmail dot com.

That's Betrayal Pod at gmail dot com.

She starts screaming and yelling at us, and we just got up and started to walk away, and then as we were walking out of their house, she's fallen behind us, and then she says, I'm going to ruin.

Your fucking lives.

I'm Andrea Gunning and this is Betrayal, Season four, Episode four, Shock to the Conscience.

In our last episode, we saw Joel Kern's double life, a side by side comparison of two different realities, but those two realities were on a collision course because Joel's reckoning day at the Colorado Springs Police Department was rapidly approaching.

This was the day he'd be forced to answer for his lies, and this time it wouldn't be Caroline who was left in disbelief.

It would be Joel's coworkers, officers he'd worked closely with for over two decades men.

He graduated from the police academy with men who'd been close friends and mentors.

In March twenty twenty two, Joel was under investigation at the CSPD because a couple came in to file a complaint against him.

The wife confessed to having sex with Joel in his police car.

He was making amends for her actions, and part of that was alerting the department that one of their officers was up to no good.

So the department launched an internal investigation and dug into the claims.

Then they called Joel in for his official interview with internal Affairs.

He was even able to bring an attorney.

His future hinged on what happened in this meeting.

We've got it all on tape and we want you to hear it.

Good to see you again.

It's been a while, okay, Joe, being in the form you've been up be here, so I'll let you read that.

They start the interview by having Joel sign a garrity advisement.

It's an acknowledgment that he's under investigation, it explains the process, and most importantly, it requires him to answer truthfully.

After he signs this document.

A lie could mean termination.

Sir, Okay, we'll get started.

It's Lieutenan ron Field Chancellor with the Coloria Springs Police Department Internal Affairs Section.

Today's Monday, March twenty first, twenty twenty two.

I'm an interviewing on Lieutenant Joel Kern in regards to Internal Affairs case twenty two.

That's ero two three.

Also present are Lieutenant James Sokolick and Lieutenant Kern's attorney, Joan John Newson.

Joel, I know you were a peer, so before going on the record where you provided a tight garrity advicetment, I was did you signed up voluntarily?

Yes?

Do you have any questions regarding the garrity advicement?

No?

Okay.

Will you be answering all of our questions concerning this matter truthfully today?

Yes?

You may remember in episode two, Joel's boss, Commander Strawsner, reported a conversation he had with Joel where Joel denied knowing the couple and was worried that someone was impersonating him or filing a false complaint.

Strawsner believed him.

This is now under garrity.

This is your opportunity to just let us know what happened.

I don't want you to feel tied to whatever you said to Strustner.

Anything that was said there is that good?

Is that?

Bear?

I'll tell you exactly what I told you.

Okay, tell us why do you think those allegations against you were brought forward?

I don't know why specifically these allegations were made, but I have some ideas.

I think maybe the the persons making allegations got in over their head or something, and I suspect that they're catfished me in whatever communication they were having.

But before they got into that, Chancel wanted to focus on the incident at Joel's house the day a stranger showed up accusing Joel of having sex with his wife and his police cruisers.

My wife out there, the one that you thought in your cruiser?

What are you talking about that?

Joel wasn't aware that the man had secretly recorded the entire encounter, and Joel didn't know that the man gave the recording to the CSPD.

Chanza gave Joel an opportunity to recount what happened from his point of view, I was just.

In shocked that someone was standing there saying this to me.

So I said, I don't know who you are, but I'm not fucking your wife or anybody else's wife.

And he.

Looked at me again and then he said, well, I don't even really know if it's you, and if it's not you, I'm really sorry.

And I took pause for a second because I'm like, you're coming to my house banging on my front door, and then you dropped this bomb on my household, and then you're going to say that you don't even know if it's me.

So I said, you need to get the fuck off my property.

I walked onto the sidewalks so I could look in the car just to see who this is.

And when I saw the person, I didn't recognize them at all.

And then she gets out of the car and then like she's staring at me, and then she has these huge, huge sunglasses on, like so huge I couldn't even see her face really, but they weren't like total blackout, and I could see through the sunglasses that looked like she had like two black eyes, and she's crying.

It seemed like Joel, in an effort to deflect the attention off of his own actions, was slightly suggesting this man was beating his wife.

And then this guy slams the back of their car and says, is that him like screaming at her?

And she startles and she starts to cry even more, and then she shakes her head yes, and then gets right back into the car.

And then he said, well, the least that you can do is apologize for ruining my family.

And then so I started walking away and I said, I have nothing to apologize for because I don't know you, I don't know your wife.

I'm not fucking your wife.

I'm not fucking anybody else.

And then I just started to walk back in my house and then they drove away eventually.

Okay, so you have never seen either one of them.

No going back to catfishing.

You made a comment about that at the beginning when we opened up.

What does that have to do with them coming to your front door?

And like two years ago there was a essentially like a breakup of friendships with like four different couples.

It seemed like Joel had come prepared with a backstory.

He says it all started at a dinner party that he and Caroline attended.

It was with a group of couples an argument broke out.

The couple hosting got into it with Caroline and Joel.

The wife in particular was enraged, so she.

Starts screaming and yelling at us, and we just got up and started to walk away, and then as we were walking out of their house, she's fallen behind us, and then she says, I'm going to ruin your fucking lives.

The story was over the top ridiculous.

Even then it got even stranger, Joel said.

Another woman got pulled into the conflict, and the two women teamed up to take down the Kerns.

There was another couple who was friends with this lady that said that she's gonna fucking.

Ruin my life or ruin our lives.

And she, when we were all friends, used to brag about how she would make fake social media accounts and then converse with people using the fake account.

Her idea of fun was to impersonate a friend of a person that they already have on Facebook, and then she would start conversing with him on the instant messaging.

Chanza asked more questions about the women Joel believed targeted his family, but eventually they got to the heart of the matter.

Have you ever had any kind of sexual contact insite your city, a scign take on vehicle?

No?

Have you ever had any sexual contact with anyone while on duty?

No?

Okay, so the allegations that are being brought against you are absolutely not true.

No.

Chanza then showed Joel a photograph of a woman.

It was not the woman who filed the complaint, it was someone else.

Have you ever met this lady?

No?

No.

Have you ever uploaded WhatsApp on your work cell phone number?

No?

Obviously you're aware we took your phone, and, as you may imagine, we dumped your laptop.

What if I were to tell you that you did communicate with someone directing them to go to WhatsApp?

With that, refresher memory?

Lieutenant Chanza began to lay out the evidence they collected.

Immediately, Joel's tone shifted, so did his story.

These guys worked with Joel for years.

This was the last situation they wanted to be in.

Obviously, you're aware we took your phone, and, as you may imagine, we dumped your flaptop.

What if I were to tell you that you did communicate with someone directing them to go to WhatsApp?

With that, refresh your memory?

Now?

I don't remember in what context you said that her names?

What would to help you if batold you she has a Denver number?

Yeah?

I met her at a brew function.

I'm sorry to what a brewery function like a beer function?

Can you describe that?

FORCE just met her.

Through there and then we started talking and then share common interests and became friends.

But I just know her as her first name.

I don't know her last name or anything like that.

Well, you recognize the pictures, right, Yeah?

Now I do?

Yep, Julie.

You know how that's looking?

Right?

Is this the person making allegations?

We'll get to.

That, But I mean, if we're trying to establish credibility veracity, I'm showing you a picture, I'm giving you a chance to take a look at it, and you're telling me to my face that you don't recognize them.

Well, I was mistaken.

I apologize for that.

I recognized her because I just met her at the prow functions.

But that's it.

The woman in the photo was the same woman we heard from in an earlier episode.

We're not using her name here.

She was the one Joel had sex with in the parking lot of a sporting good store.

The one Joel was texting when he said, there's been some drama and I deleted everything.

The CSPD had copies of their messages.

You don't have any kind of leather relationship with her?

No.

Have you communicated with her through WhatsApp?

Yes, just as friends talking through that about different things, but that's it.

Do you have a romantic relationship with her, Joel.

I do not.

Would she say differently, I don't know.

I don't have a romantic relationship with her.

You've been intimate with her?

No?

When I say intimate, I'll be very brontu belueal.

So we don't have any to have you even the physically intimate or had sex with her.

Before Joel could say anything, so Glik decided to lay it all out there.

He was done with Joel's denial.

Before you answer that could of pausing I want to say, is I want to make sure it's very clear that the internal affairs detectives are in Denver right now to contact or during this meeting.

So this should be a really easy question, Joel.

We're another hear to tricky Joe.

This is whe're trying to get to the bottom of this.

I mean, do you know both of us.

So I think let me stop things for a second here.

Okay, I really want to clear I know you're talking about catfish all this.

That is not the allegation.

The allegation, you very clear is you had sex with this person, not that she talked to you about having sex.

That you have had sex with this person in your department vehicle.

That's not a catfishing situation.

It's a very serious allegation.

And it's not like a misunderstanding.

I'm talking to the wrong person online.

This person's identifying that they had sex with you, Joel Kern in your department car, and I'll be honest that it doesn't sound as you being a one hundred percent honest to your Joel.

So we're asking again real quick understanding.

The detectors are out there to talking to her right now.

Have you in physically intimate with this individual?

Yes?

Did you have sex with them?

Yes?

Did that occur inside the department vehicle?

No?

Did it occur on duty?

No?

I mean I guess it could have.

Are you familiar with fat Life.

I've heard of it, but yeah, bet life is a cank and fetish social networking website.

Did you meet her through fat Life.

I can't remember if I did or not.

You have a fat life account?

Did you have a fat Life account?

No?

Okay, So in order to go through fat Life, you have to have an account in order to have those conversations back and forth or do dms of that kind of stuff.

So how would you have met her potentially there if you do have an account of that life.

I don't remember how I met her exactly.

It's been a few years.

So we're not gonna let's just give them this one.

You just said I might have.

So clearly you have been on fed life.

Can we establish that.

I looked at it.

Yes, But and what Jimmy just said is that you cannot get on there without having an account.

We've tested all this out.

Hm, I deleted I had an account, and then I deleted it when I was trying to get my life back on track.

Okay, that's a step in our direction.

So you had an account, but you don't know if you've met her through that life.

I think I think I did.

Yeah, but it wasn't.

You're painting it out to be.

Passing judgment, Joe.

I'll stop you there.

We're not.

We're giving you an opportunity.

To talk to us.

All we're trying to establish is that you violate policy, and if you did, obviously we have to be held accountable.

Period I mean, that's it.

We're not here to pass judgment.

So there's periods in my marriage and home life that were bad and then you know, I met her and talked to her and then we just became fast friends.

But to the question of violating policy and.

All that, okay, but you said that possibly you met her while you were on duty.

You were coming back from Denver when you went to this trip that you're thinking about where you're driving your take home vehicle.

Yes, okay, So how does that happen?

How do you meet her?

You said you went to a brewery.

It was coming back from a training and then she suggested that we meet, and then so we met on the way back, and then coming back, we just.

Met at the I forget the name of the store.

Is an outdoor store like around Lincoln and by twenty five okay.

And then where do you guys go and have intimate relationships.

Well, she came over into my car and then we just talked and everything, and then kissed.

A part of the car front passenger.

Seat, any other area of the car she might have been.

And I'm sure you can probably guess where we're going with this.

We obviously took the car, we had the lab search it and do what they do.

Would there be any chance for her DNA to be in the back of that car?

Oh, sure, she's in the car.

Or so, Joel, is your name besides kiss?

Well, this is all very embarrassing and humiliating, but yeah, we had sex.

Whereabouts in the car, in the in the back only the one time.

Okay, Joel admitted to certain details, but when and only then he realized they already knew it.

So the picture that we're getting, Joel, is that there might be more than one person, And so we want you to think about it.

Pause, if you need to take a break, if you need to use the restroom, get some water, and then we can talk about that when we get back.

They took a break, and when they returned, Chanza and so Click continued their questioning, did.

You have conversations during that light I don't know her name.

Or who she is or anything like that, but yeah, I think you had conversations or I did have conversations with her flight did.

You arrange per the download to what's appen so you guys can have conversations privately on your phone.

Yes.

Did you arrange to meet her at a oil park?

Yes, then basically you had sex with her at a oil park.

Didn't have sex, there's no penetration.

So that was oral sexallently.

Yes.

Juel is treading carefully here, because admitting to having sex in public is not only admitting to a violation of his duty, but a violation of the law.

During this conversation, said when you arranged that, basically she is submissive and you were dominant.

She says you struck her several times, leading bruises.

I will say before in front of our two.

She says this was a consensual accounter.

She is not alleging a sexual assault.

And remember you're within the confines of garrety.

Remember the garrity advisement is a warning given to police officers during an internal investigation.

The individual signing this advisement is declaring that they will tell the truth.

This is not having to do anything to do with a criminal investigation.

I'm just trying to lock in her statement.

She said you left bruses, physically struck her, pull her hair, that type of thing.

No, okay, So obviously at some point in time after this takes place, you break.

Contact with her.

Yes, yes, you have any further contact with her.

Just here there afterwards, but nothing what is here and there?

Mean just texting a little bit on the app, but no physical meetings at westoever.

So when her husband showed up, you know what he was talking about?

You know who I am?

No, guess my wife felt there when that you're talking your cruiser.

What are you talking about?

Well, yeah, but again I didn't have sex with her, as in you know, sexual intercourse or anything like that.

So but yeah, I had an idea.

Did you recognize her that day?

Vaguely?

Yes, So just to clarify the make sure that I'm showing you here, Joe ass the lady that was there that day in front of your house.

Yes.

Then the investigators turned to an important element in this case.

They have a selfie.

Joel sent to this woman, a photo where he's wearing his police uniform.

You can clearly see his badge on his chest, and the investigators needed to know why.

What was Joel's intention?

You sent a picture of yourself to the complainant in this case, the person that you met at Memorial Park.

Yes, okay, four you in uniform, can't remember?

Did you identify yourself as a police officer to this person?

And after some time after we were talking to me, is.

Why did you do that?

Because she said that she works in law.

And the intent was a developing friendships and all that and having friendships.

So it's just more of like a getting to know.

The information we received is that she was nervous.

Is that why you sent a picture of yourself or is that why you identified yourself as a police officer to now make her feel more comfortable?

No, absolutely not, But you.

Did identify yourself as a police officer.

Yes, So so we start our list.

Why didn't you see what happened?

Because it's humiliating, it's embarrassing, it's traumatic, and you know, all the demons from my past come to rise.

And I was at a low point definitely in my marriage and in my life and.

Trying to save face, trying to not get fired.

And I think maybe I priy for help.

There's anything you want to make sure that the person who means this gets here directly from you?

Yeah, I think I think I'm salvageable I acknowledge that that I needed help for a long time, and I just throw myself at the mercy of the people reading this and promise that you know, I want to do better, and I think I need help, and I think it would be nice for the department to help me get there.

We pay a lot of lip service about our employees as our family and all that, but I like to maybe somehow believe in that and recognize that I've had issues, and I've had issues for a long long time, and every day is a struggle, and I want help.

And closing this investigation is ongoing.

In order to maintain the confidentiality of this case, I'm giving you a direct order not to discuss this case or this interview with anyone other than Internal Affairs or anyone from whom the discussion would be legally protected and confidential under Colorado's statute.

Do you understand this order?

I do, okay.

This will conclude the interview.

The time now is thirteen forty four hours.

Caroline and I listened to the Internal Affairs interview together.

I wanted to know what she thought of Joel's performance.

Finally she could hear what was really going on with Joel while she was still in the dark.

Caroline remembers exactly what she was doing the week of Joel's interview because she was on vacation with her daughter.

They decided to take a trip to Vegas together and soak up the desert sun.

Joel hung back, saying he was busy with work all the while he knew he'd been caught.

He was just waiting to find out how bad the consequences would be.

And he picked us up at the airport with our dogs in the card, gets out of the car, kisses me, hugs her.

Missed you, guys, Oh, we missed you.

We're catching up.

We're talking about the food, we ate and we're filling him in.

How was work?

Oh, my gosh, so busy this week.

I have replayed that over and over and over and over again to Caroline.

Her husband seemed completely normal.

Meanwhile, he has just revealed what is going to be the detriment to our family.

Wow.

I mean he signs the garrity, which is basically saying that he's promising to tell the truth, and from the very beginning from question one, he is lying.

Do you feel like he thought that he could talk his way out of it.

I don't think he just thought he could talk his way out of it.

I think that he truly and his gut believed he would get away with it.

He not only thought that he could have his attorney believe him, but Joel believed that he would be able to have Raphael and Jimmy believe him as well.

And those are the two internal affairs investigators we heard questioning him, Raphael Chans and Jimmy Soklick.

These are two people who both knew you guys personally.

Yes.

The part that disturbs me so much on this is not just that he lied, but the level of personal connection and whom he lied to.

They were promoted on the same day together as lieutenants.

We were at Jimmy Sokolick's wedding.

Wow, these were people who had been at personal events and our lives.

He's lying to them, and not only just lying to them as professionals, colleagues and friends, but he is lying about the dynamic of our home.

There was not this unhealthy, horrible life at home.

And yet this is what he reverts back to time and time and time again on the times where he has gotten caught.

Yeah, I was going to say, he refers to your marriage being in a bad place.

And this isn't the first IA investigation where he cites this experience.

You don't look back at that time feeling like your marriage was in a bad place.

I do not do you even recognize the person on that tape.

So when I hear the investigation, I see the stranger who I lived with.

I do not know that man.

That man who is on that tape is evil.

I don't know anything about him.

He just didn't think he would get to that point.

That's why he started with the line denying, deflecting, and shifting any of the responsibility.

And then when he had to fall on his sword, magically it became all this was going sideways at home.

I have demons, I need help.

Yeah, it turned into a different deflection.

Yeah.

He would make comments about quote slaying his demons, and then he would talk about I just need to get back to the man I was.

I could be the husband I was, I could be the dad I was.

But the fact of the matter is.

What were you?

Yah?

Who were you ever?

That's a question that the kids and I have grappled with.

Those are the moments where I question things but I have to remind myself the kids and I were living the truth.

He loving the lie.

Yeah yeah, How long is it taking you to get to that place to be able to say that I.

Do it daily?

I still have to do it daily, all right.

So just to go on the record, today's ago.

About a month after Joel's Internal Affairs interview judgment day finally came, Joel had to face his boss, Commander Strassner, who had believed in him, thought the best of him.

You've heard the date several times now, April eleventh, twenty two, and Strawsner got right to it.

I want believer the point here this is not.

Did not expect to have to do this with you, Joey, Really you never expected this would have to be the case.

Did you get the agenda for the meeting?

Yes, sir, yes, sir.

Okay.

Strassner began by laying up the facts of the case.

About four thirty to five pm, you informed me that you knew you were under investigation.

When I asked how you knew that, you proceeded doing tell me about the confrontation that occurred on February fifth, professing your innocence and adamantly denying any involvement in the situation.

I had no reason not to believe your innocence in this case, which meant that either the couple was lying and needed to be criminally charged, or that another cop was impersonating you and needed to be fired, and that we would make sure the case was thoroughly investigated.

After being advised and signing the garrity warning, which included in order to answer questions truthfully, you knowingly lied, providing false information to the investigators from nearly forty to forty five minutes.

You initially attempted to blame someone you know as for causing you and your wife's problems and somehow causing this complaint by catfishing you online.

You initially denied ever having an account on fet life and denied knowing either.

Only after being confronted with specific facts did you begin to admit to having sex with While admitting to having sex with her, you initially denied the encounter occurred in your police car.

You later confessed you might have met her on fet life, and then did admit the sexual encounter did occur in your police vehicle.

After taking a break in the interview, you returned finally you admit that you arranged a meeting and memorial park with you stated you did not have sex with her because there was no penetration, and quite frankly, I think this is QUI over the details.

Because she did perform oral sex on you in the back of the suv.

There are discrepancies in the rest of the interview between what can you describe as having occurred in the back of the suv.

Quite frankly, those details are irrelevant to proving the overall case.

However, given the false statements you've provided to Internal Affairs, I have no reason to discount any of her recollection of these events.

That's my overall case summary.

Lieutenant.

Do you have any comments that you want to make.

I'm extremely remorseful, I'm extremely ashamed, humiliated, embarrassed, upset.

I'm begging for mercy.

I literally was not in my right mind, and I've been going through a hard time for several years and I can promise you that.

Nothing like that, whatever ever, happen again.

I initially light in the eye interview because I was humiliated, embarrassed, scared.

Didn't I want to.

How this come to fruition and lose everything.

That I have.

I am on bended knee asking for forgiveness.

I promise you that none of this will ever happen again.

I understand that I've shattered your trust and it's something that I want to work hard to get back.

I apologize for any of this happening.

The last three months have been hell, and I just am begging for your mercy.

I'm gonna move to the next section here and just talking about my comments and insight regarding this case.

This case is not about the sex or how you meant these women.

Honestly, I don't really care what your preferences are unless the PD is somehow brought into this situation.

Has occurred in this case when you sent essentially these strangers a photograph of yourself in police uniform and used your work vehicle for your activities.

That's what made this police issue.

The week the allegation was filed, you didn't need to say anything to me about the case, and quite honestly, I wish you'd not said.

Anything to me at all.

You literally lied.

To my face on that Wednesday afternoon proclaiming your innocence, and unless than twenty minutes later was texting with to tell her there was drama, and that you deleted everything.

Even on Friday, when I tried to reassure you that I had no reason not to believe you and would make sure that this case was the investigated, you didn't flinch even when I threatened to criminally charge this couple or maybe fire another employee, and you later thanked me for believing in you.

To me, this is the most disturbing piece of the entire case.

Even in your interview with IA, as a former investigator yourself, you lied to Jimmy and rolf A, all trying to pin this on a third person named You had five and a half weeks to think about your interview and decided to stick with your story and deny that any of this occurred.

The fact that you lied, the fact that you were willing to put this on a third person or possibly even have charges filed against the complainant, is absolutely horrific and constitutes a violation of your oath in office.

I also cannot ignore the previous history from the twenty nineteen case.

Strawsner is referring to the case when a reporter contacted the CSPD because Joel was for the public information officer job.

The reporter alleged that Joel had sexually harassed her and other reporters.

Twenty nineteen, Commander Mandel wrote, in regard to that incident, Lieutenant Kern is a valuable member of the departments, committed to putting this behind him and being a better person and leader for the organization.

I have full confidence that Lieutenant Kern has learned from his mistakes and he will not place himself or the department in this position again.

I'm hearing some of the same things that were said last time.

In that case, Strassner is right back in twenty nineteen, Joel had used some of the exact same language.

Here's Joel in twenty nineteen.

I'm mis shaped, and I'm embarrassed, and I'm hamiliated, and again I take four responsibility for my actions and yes, for mercy.

Not only did you put yourself in that same position, you made it worse.

Someone might make that argument that you were initially evasive in the ie interview, but that you rectified it later by telling the truth.

I want to be clear that I do not believe you fully redeemed your credibility or you were completely transparent even near the end of your interview.

You were specifically asked by Lieutenant Socolick whether you deleted the WhatsApp, to which you told them yes.

Later, Lieutenant Chansa asked you do you still use WhatsApp currently, and you replied, just to talk to I believe the slip up proves you're still not being completely honest with investigators, that you're unable to keep track of all your lives, and quite frankly, I question how many other women are out there that may bring forward allegations in the future.

Now, before I present my findings, I want to address something you stated during your interview with Lieutenant chans And Sokolick said that you believe you need help and it would be nice for the department to help you get there, And you said, quote, we pay a lot of lip service about our employees as family, and I'd like to maybe somehow believe in that and recognize I've had issues.

I want to point out a couple of things.

In twenty nineteen, you receive nothing more than a written reprimand at a time when you might have been able to get more, and you said you were already seeking the help.

I believe this department has treated you more than fair regarding these previous indiscretions.

I'm not saying that they weren't.

I'm about to go into the findings of the policies.

Did you have anything you wanted to add?

Yeah, that I know that the department has been good to me.

I am sorry that I that this kind of stuff happened a second time, but I swear that there is nobody else.

I'm willing to do whatever it takes to hold on to my employment, and two to show that I can do better.

And I apologize from the bottom of my heart.

I understand that it looks bad the way everything's been discussed here, and again, I'm begging for your mercy.

Strassner was unmoved.

Okay, let's go through each of the policies.

So as I go through these, remember the standard as a preponderance of the evidence.

First one is nine oh six point three ero.

It's the take home Vehicles policy.

By a preponderance of the evidence, your take home vehicle was inappropriately used.

This allegation is sustained four hundred point three ero.

Another big one, conduct unbecoming of a police officer.

What's reasonable believe that using photographs of yourself an official police uniform to gain the trust of women you have met on fees life and then having sex with them in an official police vehicle has brought disrepute to the police department.

Further, your false statements to me at the onset were unsolicited and used to paint yourself in the most favorable light regarding this investigation.

This allegation is sustained.

Then Strawsner reached the most egregious of Joel's violations, and the final.

Allegation is four hundred point one to three employee conduct departing from the truth.

Employees will not willfully or knowingly depart from the truth and giving testimony or in connection with official duties.

You were given a garrity advisement and sign that invisement, knowing you were being ordered to tell the truth by a preponderance of the evidence, you gave a false statement for the first approximate forty minutes of the interview.

Only when confronted with evidence did you finally begin to confess some of your role in this case.

Yet, as I said, I still am not sure that you've told the whole truth.

This is sustained as well.

This whole thing has just been like a shock to my conscience.

It really has, and honestly, I think we've been painted into a corner where there's really only one outcome.

In this case, I can recommend.

I have no option but to recommend your termination.

Caroline.

It feels like, maybe for the first time, someone with authority sees through Joel's facade.

What went through your mind when you heard Joel's boss in front him.

I think it's fascinating to listen to when Strasner says, and I believe there's more, there's more women.

I question how many other women will come forward?

And then hearing Joel say I swear these were the only two.

I swear these were the only two.

And next thing you know, it's all kinds of different names are being revealed, and all of these sexual encounters and sexually illicit behavior while he's under the guise of a police officer.

Did you ever talk to Strawsner?

I did.

What can you tell me about that?

There's two people who.

A lot of people will be shocked that I'm grateful for the first one is the male who came to my front door, the husband of the wife who Joel had an affair with.

And the second one is Jeff Strassner.

I'm extremely grateful for Jeff Strawssner.

I was at a community event and he was there, and as we walked out together, I said, hey, Jeff, and I could tell he was nervous to see me, and he was like, oh, you know, hey, Caroline, and I said I'd like to thank you, and he looks shocked, and I said, thank you for not believing him.

Thank you for.

The due diligence of hearing this one out and not giving him the benefit of the doubt.

You may have saved mine in my kids' lives.

Thank you.

And Jeff's always been a very friendly and a little bit stoic of a man.

But his voice started a crack and you could see the emotion on him, and he said, oh my gosh, thank you for saying that.

I appreciate you saying that.

I have thought about you and the kids so much.

So when I hear Jeff Strassner's commentary in this interview, I'm extremely grateful for him.

I know that just hours later is when Joel's going to do his reveal to me and the kids.

So it's an interesting thing to reflect back on it and think, yeah, what that day must have been like in his world.

So we know that Strassner recommended Joel for termination, but he wasn't fired, was he.

No?

Joel wasn't fired, and this case only gets more interesting.

We'll explore how he was able to avoid termination on the next episode of Betrayal.

Thank you for listening to Betrayal season four.

If you would like to reach out to the Betrayal team, email us at Betrayalpod at gmail dot com.

That's Betrayal Pod at gmail dot com.

Also, please be sure to follow us on Instagram at Betrayal Pod and me Andrea H.

Gunning for all Betrayal content, news and updates.

One way to support the series is by subscribing to our show on Apple Podcasts.

Please rate and review Betrayal five star reviews help us know you appreciate what we do.

Betrayal is a production of Glass Podcasts, a division of Glass Entertainment Group, in partnership with iHeart Podcasts.

The show is executive produced by Nancy Glass and Jennifer Fason.

Betrayal is hosted and produced by me Andrea Gunning, written and produced by Carrie Hartman, also produced by Ben Fetterman, our associate producers are Caitlin Golden and Kristin Melcury.

Our iHeart team is Ali Perry and Jessica Crincheck.

Story editing by Monique Leboard, audio editing and mixing by Matt Delvecchio, editing by Tanner Robbins, and special thanks to Caroline and her family.

Betrayal's theme is composed by Oliver Baines.

Music library provided by my Music and For more podcasts from iHeart, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts