In Davos last month, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney lamented what he called “the end of a pleasant fiction.” That notion has is hard to fathom yet impossible to ignore.

For decades, the United States did not merely wield power. It framed power in moral terms. Legitimacy. Integrity. Rules. Whether we always lived up to those words is one question. Whether we still speak them with credibility is another.

In this solo reflection, Corey Nathan explores what it means when America is no longer the country that lends moral language to the world order, but the country other nations feel compelled to hedge against. From Tocqueville’s warning about democratic withdrawal to Jonathan Rauch’s analysis of patrimonialism, from Lincoln’s humility to the theological posture of the National Prayer Breakfast, this episode wrestles with a turning point.

If the pleasant fiction is over, what replaces it?

Calls to Action

✅ If this conversation resonates, consider sharing it with someone who believes connection across difference still matters.

✅ Subscribe to Corey’s Substack: coreysnathan.substack.com

✅ Leave a review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen: ratethispodcast.com/goodfaithpolitics

✅ Subscribe to Talkin’ Politics & Religion Without Killin’ Each Other on your favorite podcast platform.

✅ Watch the full conversation and subscribe on YouTube: youtube.com/@politicsandreligion

What This Episode Explores The End of a Moral Vocabulary

For generations, American power was framed in moral language. Integrity and legitimacy were not just strategic tools but aspirations. Today, that language lands differently, not as calling card but as indictment.

From Moral Order to Patrimonialism

Drawing on the work of Jonathan Rauch, this episode examines what happens when public power begins to resemble personal property. Loyalty replaces rules. Access depends on fealty. Markets and institutions begin to read the room rather than uphold neutral principles.

The National Prayer Breakfast and Theological Posture

A prayer breakfast is meant to orient upward in humility. When reverence bends inward, the shift is not merely stylistic. It is theological.

Tocqueville’s Warning

Democracy’s danger may not arrive as sudden tyranny but as gradual withdrawal. Citizens retreat into private grievance. Moral discipline erodes. Individualism curdles into narcissism.

The Comforting Assumption About Ourselves

Nearly every white pastor today believes they would have stood with Martin Luther King Jr. The question is not whether that belief is sincere. The question is whether it would have been true.

The Choice Before Citizens

The world is already adjusting. Allies hedge. Middle powers collaborate. The question now belongs to citizens, not prime ministers. Withdrawal is understandable. It is not inevitable.

Why This Matters Now

The loss at stake is not only status but trust.

If the pleasant fiction required tending, then its collapse requires responsibility. Renewal, if it comes, will not arrive through taunts or spectacle. It will be decided by habits, by courage, by whether citizens retreat or step forward.

Connect on Social Media

Corey is @coreysnathan on all the socials...

• Substack
• LinkedIn
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Twitter
• Threads
• Bluesky
• TikTok

Thanks to our Sponsors and Partners

Thanks to Pew Research Center for making today’s conversation possible.
Gratitude as well to Village Square for coming alongside us in this work and helping foster better civic dialogue.

Links and additional resources:

• Pew Research Center: pewresearch.org

• The Village Square: villagesquare.us

• Meza Wealth Management: mezawealth.com

Proud members of The Democracy Group

Final Thought

The question is not who we would like to identify with in the story.

The question is where our words, positions, and actions actually place us.

Go talk some politics and religion.
Step forward.
With gentleness and respect.