Episode Description
Running Grave, book Seven of the ten novel Cormoran Strike murder mystery series by Joanne Murray (‘J. K. Rowling’) writing as ‘Robert Galbraith,’ is what the author described as her “cult novel.” The cult in question is the Universal Humanitarian Church led by Jonathan Wace; the Strike-Ellacott Agency is hired by a father to rescue his youngest son who has disappeared into the UHC’s Chapman Farm property. Robin Ellacott successfully infiltrates the compound and she and the young man escape.
Soon after Robin’s near-thing deliverance and return to London, Strike attends a UHC rally in that city with hopes that he will be spotted by Wace and invited to meet back-stage. ‘Papa J’ takes the bait and he and Strike square off in the cult leader’s dressing room. Strike reveals much of what Robin and he have learned about the UHC’s criminal past and present in that verbal confrontation. Strike exits only after delivering a warning; stay away from his partner or “I will burn your church to the f*****g ground” (Part 8, chapter 112, 808; italics in original).
In the midst of this tense back-and-forth between private detective and religious guru, Strike thrice mentions a book published in 1930, Who Moved the Stone?, a relatively short work of popular Christian apologetics:
‘I see you’re one of those who prides themselves on disrespecting rites, mysteries, and religious observance,’ said Wace, smiling again. ‘I shall pray for you, Cormoran. I mean that sincerely.’
‘I’ll tell you one book I’ve read, that’s right up your street,’ said Strike. ‘Came across it in a Christian mission where I was spending a night, just outside Nairobi. This was when I was still in the army. I’d drunk too much coffee, and there were only two books in the room, and it was late, and I didn’t think I’d be able to make much of a dent in the Bible, so I went for Who Moved the Stone? by Frank Morison. Have you read it?’
‘I’ve heard of it,’ said Wace, sitting back in his chair, still smiling. ‘We recognise Jesus Christ as an important emissary of the Blessed Divinity, though, of course, he’s not the only one.’
‘Oh, he had nothing on you, obviously,’ said Strike. ‘Anyway, Morison was a non-believer who set out to prove the resurrection never happened. He did an in-depth investigation into the events surrounding Jesus’ death, drawing on as many historical sources as he could find, and as a direct result, was converted to Christianity. You see what I’m driving at?’
‘I’m afraid not,’ said Wace.
‘What questions d’you think Morison would’ve wanted answered, if he set out to disprove the legend of the Drowned Prophet?’ (805)
This calling into question of the UHC’s historical claim to other-worldly power causes those of Wace’s inner-circle minions to chafe and counter with traditional Oriental wisdom about wrestling with pigs. Strike again alludes to Morison’s book:
‘Is that from the I Ching?’ asked Strike, looking from Zhou to Mazu. ‘Funnily enough, I’ve got a few questions on the subject of degradation, if you’d rather hear those? No?’ he said, when nobody answered. ‘Back to what I was saying, then.’
‘Let’s suppose I fancy writing the new Who Moved the Stone? – working title, “Why Paddle in the North Sea at Five a.m.?” As a sceptical investigator of the miraculous ascension into heaven of Daiyu, I think I’d start with how Cherie knew Jordan Reaney would oversleep that morning. Then I’d be finding out why Daiyu was wearing a dress that made her as visible as possible in the dark, why she drowned off exactly the same stretch of beach as your first wife and – parallels with Who Moved the Stone? here – I’d want to know where the body went. But unlike Morison, I might include a chapter on Birmingham’ (805-806).
John Granger and Nick Jeffery, as part of their Kanreki celebration of Rowling-Galbraith’s 60th birthday last July, discussed Texts-Within-the-Text as a Golden Thread that runs through all of the author’s work. Most of those embedded texts, though, are of Rowling’s invention, e.g., Dumbledore’s Chocolate Frog Card, Tales of Beedle the Bard, Bombyx Mori, The Predictions of Tycho Dodonus, Wace’s The Answer, etc. It’s fairly rare for Rowling-Galbraith to drop a reference to a real world book even in the relatively non-magical Strike series.
In addition to the I Ching, however, Running Grave has Prudence Donleavy recommend two psychology texts to Robin (Lifton’s Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brain Washing in China and Hassan’s Combatting Cult Mind Control: Protection, Rescue, and Recovery from Destructive Cults) in addition to Strike’s weaponization of Morison’s Who Moved the Stone?
John and Nick chose to discuss Who Moved the Stone? this week rather than an embedded text that works as a template (cf., Aurora Leigh) or a Rowling favorite-book that shaped her perspective (e.g., I Capture the Castle) or a real-world book tied to the plot of Hallmarked Man (Bridge to Light, Pike’s Morals and Dogma) because it seemed to connect the dots of several recent Rowling revelations:
* the “God-shaped vacuum” tweet;
* the unforced admission that she suffers from VWD, a blood-clotting disorder;
* the search for the coming Big Twist in the final books of the Strike series;
* the Psalter charm on the Strike9 Christmas gift bracelet-of-clues;
* the Church of St Giles in the Fields’ existence and its incredible absence from the first eight Strike books despite its overshadowing Denmark Street; and
* the absence of Strike-series parallels to the Christian content and meaning of the Potter series, especially with respect to the Struggle to Believe in Deathly Hallows.
For reasons the two discuss, all the above are pointers to possible Christian content of Strike books nine and ten, even that this content will be a substantial part of the mind-bending surprise finish to the series, namely, Strike’s transformation from a skeptic with respect to all things religious to believer. What bigger clue has Rowling presented in the series for that possibility than Strike’s confronting a religious “fraud and hypocrite” (799) with a book by an English skeptic about the evidence for belief in Christ’s Resurrection from the dead?
Nick and John discuss both Who Moved the Stone? itself, its use in Running Grave in the Strike-Wace confrontation, and its possible meaning as a pointer to revelations and transformations to come:
1. Why is a Rowling Reader interested in Frank Morison’s Who Moved the Stone? ?
2. Who was ‘Frank Morison‘? What is the story behind the writing of Who Moved the Stone? ? What place does it have, if any, in UK Christian apologetics?
3. Do you think there are echoes of ‘Morison’s conclusions in the Passion parts of Dorothy Sayers’ Man Born to be King series for the BBC (1941)?
4. Chesterton per Wikipedia wrote in his review of Stone that he had been “under the impression it was a detective story” when he picked it up; how much does it read like a murder mystery, something akin to how Strike might sift through the evidence of a case?
5. Five instances of deductive insights Ross-Morison offers by reasoning that even most Christian believers would have considered —
6. A compare-and-contrast exercise of different perspectives -- John, believer, familiar with passion gospels; Nick, seeker, not so much -- how did their reading experiences differ?
7. Why would Rowling-Galbraith have Strike mention this book, one that fosters conversions to Christian faith, in his face-to-face meeting with a religious charlatan? Shouldn’t he be belittling faith at that point?
8. If there is a single ‘keyword’ in Stone, John believes it is “vacancy.” Nick and John discuss (1) the possibility that Rowling may have read this book as a young person and been struck by the God-shaped “vacancy” or “Vacuum” in her own life and (2) whether it could have been an influence on the Casual Vacancy title. They review Rowling comments about “the light of God shining from every soul” in her Vacancy interviews.
9 - John expresses his bewilderment that Robin and Cormoran have never discussed their faith backgrounds or lack of one in the course of their relationship, especially in light of their UHC cult experiences and Talbot’s True Book with its occult and Christian content. Nick explains the fall out of the English Civil War to John.
10. Could Strike’s familiarity with and seeming sympathy with the arguments of Stone a place-marker for future conversations about faith, not to mention revelations of why both Strike and Robin are so casual about the vacancy of a spiritual dimension in their lives?
The remarkable take-away from this conversation was a discussion of the possibility that Rowling’s tweeted ‘Psyche Ascendant’ suggests the imminent death of Robin Ellacott in Strike 9 with Strike 10 being fallout of that death in the life of Cormoran Strike. ‘Fall out’ meaning Strike will learn the truth about all the questions to which he mistakenly thought he knew the answers — the suicides of his mother and Charlotte Campbell-Ross, the character of Jonny Rokeby, Ryan Murphy’s real motivation for pursuing Robin Ellacott, Cormoran’s relationships with his half-sister Lucy and “oldest mate” Dave Polworth — as well as ‘Who Killed the Better Half of the Strike Ellacott Detective Agency?’
John thinks the revelations coupled with Strike’s grief may drive him to his knees in St Giles in the Fields Church, a ‘Digging Dobby’s Grave on Easter morning’ parallel. Make your case in the comment boxes below if you think that he has lost his mind somewhere on the drive east from Oklahoma to the Carolinas.
The Granger family is now well settled in their South Carolina bungalow and Hogwarts Professor will be posting with regularity. Nick and John thank you for your patience and for your support!
Links to Sources and Subjects Mentioned in Conversation:
‘A Ring Reading of Running Grave, Part Eight’ (John Granger)
Who Moved the Stone? by Frank Morison (Amazon)
‘Albert Henry Ross’ aka ‘Frank Morison’ (Wikipedia)
‘Frank Morison and Who Moved the Stone? Advertiser, Novelist, Apologist, Spy’ (Philip Johnson, Lecturer, Morling College, New South Wales, 2018)
* Most of the information that Nick and John shared about Ross/Morison and his book Who Moved the Stone? came from this carefully researched paper.
‘Philip Johnson’ UC Berkeley Law Professor, author Darwin on Trial (Wikipedia)
Darwin Retried: An Appeal to Reason (Norman MacBeth)
Dorothy Sayers' Man Born to be King series for the BBC (1941)?
G. K. Chesterton review of Who Moved the Stone? in The Illustrated London News (5 April 1930)
‘Reading Troubled Blood as a Medieval Moral Play and Allegory:’ Roy Phipps the “bloody bleeder” as King Philip of Spain (John Granger)
‘Justin Martyr and the Fourth Gospel’ (Fr John Romanides, 1958, on the relationship of the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel According to St John)
An examination of the Biblical sources reveals the fact that underlying the New Testament is the catechetical principle that one is able to discern the will and acts of God only according to the measure and degree in which he has been liberated from demonic influences and by spiritual exercise learns to distinguish between divine and satanic energies. This liberation is accomplished in Christ by the power of the Spirit but its effect on man is not automatic. Where it does begin its process is generally gradual as is evident in the tardy way in which the Apostles came to a full understanding of the way the kingdom of God had come upon them. Failure to understand and partake of the mysteries of the kingdom is attributed to continuance in the ways of Satan (e.g., Mtth. 13, 1-23; Mk. 4, 1-20; Lk. 8, 4-15; II Cor. 4, 3-4).
Before a person was admitted to baptism, he had to be instructed in the old Testament revelations of the divine activities as well as in the ways of satan. Otherwise, he would continue being blinded by the devil and would be in danger of confounding divine and satanic activities as happened in the case of the Jews who went so far as to say that Jesus cast out demons by the power of Belzebub (Mtth. 12, 22-37; Mk. 3, 22-30; Lk. 11, 14-23). This is the blasphemy against the Spirit which cannot be forgiven. Those who are not able to recognize the energies of God are those who by hearing hear but do not understand and seeing see but do not discern (Is. 6, 9; Mtth. 13, 14; Mk. 4,12; Lk. 8, 10; John 12, 40; Acts 28, 26 ff.). The fourth gospel is a continuous play on the divinity of Christ as witnessed to by the divine activities which He shares in common with the Father and the Spirit and which are eventually understood by those who are defeating the devil but continuously misunderstood by those blinded by the prince of darkness. The fourth gospel is understood only by those who have been previously exercised in the discernment of the saving and sanctifying acts of God in both the Old Testament and Synoptic tradition, apart from whose soteriological presuppositions it is totally meaningless.
Contemporary Case for Religious Belief in General:
Believe: Why Everyone Should Be Religious
Why Religion Matters: The Fate of the Human Spirit in an Age of Disbelief
The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism
Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies
Seven Christian Apologetics Classics
The Case for Christ (Movie version!)
Evidence that Demands a Verdict: Life Changing Truth for a Skeptical World
Mere Christianity (C. S. Lewis)
Handbook of Christian Apologetics
Exposing Myths about Christianity
Elements of Faith: An Introduction to Orthodox Theology
Hogwarts Professor is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit hogwartsprofessor.substack.com/subscribe