Navigated to Can political science contribute to the AI discourse?

Can political science contribute to the AI discourse?

October 7
58 mins

Episode Description

Economists generally see AI as a production technology, or input into production. But maybe AI is actually more impactful as unlocking a new way of organizing society. Finish this story:

* The printing press unlocked the Enlightenment — along with both liberal democracy and France’s Reign of Terror

* Communism is primitive socialism plus electricity

* The radio was an essential prerequisite for fascism

* AI will unlock ????

We read “AI as Governance” by Henry Farrell in order to understand whether and how political scientists are thinking about this question.

* Concepts or other books discussed:

* E. Glen Weyl, coauthor of Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society, and key figure in the Plurality Institute was brought up by Seth as an example of an economist-political science crossover figure who is thinking about using technology to radically reform markets and governance.

* Cybernetics: This is a “science” that studies human-technological systems from an engineering perspective. Historically, it has been implicated in some fantastic social mistakes, such as China’s one-child policy.

* Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem: The economic result that society may not have rational preferences — if true, “satisfying social preferences” may not be a possible goal to maximize

* GovAI - Centre for the Governance of AI

* Papers on how much people/communication is already being distorted by AI:

* Previous episode mentioned in the context of AI for social control:

* Simulacra and Simulation (Baudrillard): Baudrillard (to the extent that any particular view can be attributed to someone so anti-reality) believed that society lives in “Simulacra”. That is, artificially, technologically or socially constructed realities that may have some pretense of connection to ultimate reality (i.e. a simulation) but are in fact completely untethered fantasy worlds at the whim of techno-capitalist power. A Keynesian economic model might be a simulation, whereas Dwarf Fortress is a simulacra (a simulation of something that never existed). Whenever Justified Posteriors hears “governance as simulation”, it thinks: simulation or simulacra?

Episode Timestamps

[00:00:00] Introductions and the hosts’ backgrounds in political science.

[00:04:45] Introduction of the core essay: Henry Farrell’s “AI as Governance.”

[00:05:30] Stating our Priors on AI as Governance

[00:15:30] Defining Governance (Information processing and social coordination).

[00:19:45] Governance as “Lossy Simulations” (Markets, Democracy, Bureaucracy).

[00:25:30] AI as a tool for Democratic Consensus and Preference Extraction.

[00:28:45] The debate on Algorithmic Bias and cultural bias in LLMs.

[00:33:00] AI as a Cultural Technology and the political battles over information.

[00:39:45] Low-cost signaling and the degradation of communication (AI-generated resumes).

[00:43:00] Speculation on automated Cultural Battles (AI vs. AI).

[00:51:30] Justifying Posteriors: Updating beliefs on the need for a new political science.



This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit empiricrafting.substack.com
See all episodes

Never lose your place, on any device

Create a free account to sync, back up, and get personal recommendations.