Can Christians embrace an old earth while maintaining biblical faithfulness? This challenging question strikes at the heart of competing worldviews. Logic demonstrates that deep time belongs naturally to naturalism, not Christianity, creating fundamental tensions for believers who accept billions of years.

The argument reveals how old-earth theories align perfectly with naturalistic assumptions about reality, knowledge, and history. Meanwhile, Scripture's creation-fall-flood narrative, biblical chronology, and core doctrines like divine providence point consistently toward a young earth. Written by John K Reed.

🔗 Links and Show Notes

• Original article: Worldviews, Logic, and Earth’s Age—Part 1
• Worldviews, Logic, and Earth’s Age—Part 2
• Defining arguments away—the distorted language of secularism
• Two worldviews in conflict
• Creation in-depth: Soft secularism is no solution

🌎 Find much-much more at Creation.com

👍 Social Media
► Follow on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and get the eNewsletter.

Check out our other show Creation Talk.

📚 Related Resources

• Refuting Compromise (book)
• The Genesis Account (book)
• 15 Reasons to Take Genesis as History (booklet)

This episode article was produced by Joseph Darnell out of the CMI-USA studio. Become a monthly contributor at our site. You can also help out by telling your family and friends to check out the podcast.

Thanks for listening to the Creation.com Article Podcast!