Navigated to Analyzing the Hockey Canada trial [2]

Analyzing the Hockey Canada trial [2]

September 7
1h 33m

View Transcript

Episode Description

[Part 2 of 3} The Hockey Canada verdicts are final, but the story isn’t. Kristi Lee looks closely at the most talked-about evidence, how it was reflected in the written decision, and how that shaped public opinion. Thanks for your patience!


In this episode:

  • The flaws in the first police investigation - and why it didn't result in charges
  • Michael McLeod's instagram exchange with EM the day after the hotel room incident
  • The "group chat" six days later that appears to show the hockey players trying to get their stories straight
  • The series of debacles that resulted in this jury trial switching to judge-alone
  • Survivors JB and Kelly Favro return to share their perspectives about watching this case unfold not only as survivors — but also as massive hockey fans.


*Additional content warning: Details of sexual acts.


PLEASE NOTE: This series does not dispute the judge’s verdicts. Instead, it highlights a deeper truth: contradictions and inconsistencies existed on both sides, yet the accused players’ accounts were overwhelmingly accepted while the victim-complainant's was dismissed as “not credible or reliable.” Regardless of verdicts, our position is that this framing was both unnecessary and harmful — and its impact reaches far beyond the trial itself.


More information and resources:


Look out for early, ad-free release on CTC premium feeds: available on Amazon Music (included with 

Prime), Apple Podcasts, Patreon and Supercast.


Full list of resources, information sources, credits and music credits:

See the page for this episode at www.canadiantruecrime.ca/episodes

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

See all episodes

Never lose your place, on any device

Create a free account to sync, back up, and get personal recommendations.