Is AI an "efficiency engine" or a "cognitive crutch"? In this episode, Dan and Ray explore the OECD's latest warnings regarding "metacognitive laziness" - the risk of students offloading the thinking process entirely to generative tools. As the OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 suggests, without pedagogical guardrails, we may be sacrificing long-term learning for short-term performance.   The discussion shifts to the UK's aggressive new response: the Department of Education's Safety Standards. These rules explicitly ban "sycophantic" or flattering AI designs, stripping away avatars and "personhood" to ensure AI remains a tool rather than a digital companion. We discuss a NY Times article about AI in schools too, and the global experiments. We also dive into Deakin University's multidisciplinary inquiry, which provides six essential curriculum recommendations for a world of ubiquitous AI. Finally, we highlight the release of Leon Furze's Teaching AI Ethics, a vital new (and free) resource for teachers navigating these complex waters. Key References:

• OECD: Digital Education Outlook 2026
• UK DfE: Generative AI Product Safety Standards for Education (Jan 2026)
• UK DfE: Commitment to AI Tutoring for disadvantaged children
• NY Times: As Schools Embrace A.I. Tools, Sceptics Raise Concerns
• Deakin University's FutureFocus GenAI program
• Free E-Book: Teaching AI Ethics by Leon Furze (teachingaiethics.com)